User talk:Deity11

Speedy deletion nomination of Kirsty Anne Symonds


A tag has been placed on Kirsty Anne Symonds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Save our seaside virgin media"
A page you created, Save our seaside virgin media, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Windchaser (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monotheism, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Preternatural, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 22:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)