User talk:Dejakitty

Arbitration voting
"Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:54, 22 November 2005 (UTC)"

Hi Dejakitty, Thanks for your contributions to the discussion and article. Arbitration is currently voting on a proposal to semi-protect the article, and give administrators the right to temporarily ban anyone who engages in POV editing the main article or related pages. --Comaze 00:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * But the article is open to editing now, be careful though, source your material and don't edit war. Fred Bauder 18:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefully the situation will improve Fred Bauder

NLP Page Desires Entry Please?
Hi Kitty, If you would be so kind, as to add your comment here under your name. This will help me understand your position then later in coordinance with the others. Then later when you express your opinion we will have already had it and can work from there to get 'er done! jVirus 23:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I wrote a bit more. I am trying to find out what people feel is the top thing of import for change. They tend to have so many hehe. jVirus 04:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

NLP sockpuppets all gone
if you come back FT2 (Talk) 14:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

NLP article / reconstruction update
Hiya,

Quick courtesy update. I've noticed you recently contributed to Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming, commenting on the article reconstruction. I'm working on a reconstruct of the main article, and I think it will put NLP onto a regular Wikipedia basis (explanation, balanced coverage, citation). Thing is, it's not a small job. I don't want to get there only to be flamed at for rewriting it without some form of consensus.

What I'd like to do instead is open up the reconstruct article as I work on it this coming week, for comments and criticisms, and to get feedback as it develops, or answer questions on the layout or get improvements and so on. Does thsi sound OK to you? If so please leave a message and let me know, and I'll move the draft reconstruction to a sensible place chunk by chunk as it's ready for review and consensus.

Let me know if this seems okay to you? If not let me know and we can discuss what would work instead. My main concern is to get a balanced prototype written relatively quickly that is in line with basic Wikipedia standards and covers the field appropriately.

Thanks for your help, look forward to hearing back that it's okay! FT2 (Talk 20:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Bakumatsu Kikansetsu Irohanihoheto
A tag has been placed on Bakumatsu Kikansetsu Irohanihoheto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Bakumatsu Kikansetsu Irohanihoheto. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such material.Diez2 00:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)