User talk:DejanKar

April 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 12:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I think the link is more appropriate than the current link, and i'm not promoting anything. The thing is that lens.me is a great source of content about colored contact lenses and thy answer a lot of questions around the topic. If you find the link inappropriate you can chose another link but it's way more relevant than the current one.
 * This is a good link example as well: https://www.lens.me/blog/ultimate-guide-to-color-contact-lenses-everything-you-need-to-know
 * Best Regards,
 * Dean DejanKar (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * We don't use marketing materials or web stores as sources. MrOllie (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Just check link no.52. How is that different than this website? Ok i get it you don't want web stores links but i gave you a blog link which should be the same as 52. What i'm trying to understand here is how a dead link is better than my suggestion, or how 52 is better than this? Open to continue the conversation as it's very interesting to me :) DejanKar (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you have found other spam on Wikipedia, that is a reason to fix that problem, not add more spam links. Dead links are indeed preferable to spam, since they might be fixed some day. MrOllie (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but how you consider spam? I really don't get it. I think it's a relevant source with a lot of reputation in the sphere of cosmetic contact lenses, so that's how i made my judgement to put it there. Ok, i might put the products list page and i agree probably a blog page is a better option but i still don't know how is that spam? DejanKar (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I consider vendor sites and blogs to be spam, since their primary purpose is to advertise. I'll be clear: don't use any page on lens.me, they do not meet our linking or sourcing requirements. If you have general questions about sourcing on Wikipedia, WP:TEAHOUSE is a good place to get answers. MrOllie (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In most cases i need to agree with you, in these case i think you are wrong. My personal opinion is that lens.me is much more relevant for Cosmetic Contact Lenses topics than eyecandys.com and the link that you already deleted, but i also get your point even if i disagree. Thanks for suggesting.WP:TEAHOUSE will check it as i want to learn more about content editing on Wikipedia. DejanKar (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)