User talk:Dejudicibus/Dario de Judicibus

This article was taken from the pre-existing version on the Italian Wikipedia. It was originally written by Mr de Judicibus himself, and modified by many other editors.

It was nominated for deletion from the Italian Wikipedia in January of 2006; the outcome of the debate was that the article be kept. Subsequently, it was translated into English, again by Mr de Judicibus. DS 14:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Please note that in the italian wikipedia 22 people voted delete (thinking that the page is spam and/or this author is not notable), 13 keep but a majority of 2/3 was necessary, so the page was saved, although the majority of people wanted it to be deleted (just 4 more votes and it would have been deleted!). --134.100.1.20 12:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, but that was before the page was rewritten by Wikipedia senior contributors. Now the page is very different from the voted one. --Dejudicibus 17:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it's time to delete this page. Why keep an author in english wikipedia that is almost unknown in italy?


 * Because he is not unknown in Italy at all! Search for him and recensione (reviews) or intervista (interview) in Google and you'll get a lot of entries. The problem is that fantasy is not a popular literary genre in Italy as it is in USA or UK. So, only the amateurs of fantasy know the Italian authors, and they are really few. Six, seven probably, no more. You have more authors if you add science fiction and horror writers, but that's all. Most of people who is not interested in fantasy do not know Italian or even American authors. The only exception is the mother of Harry Potter and Tolkien, but just for movies. In USA it is different: everybody knows Ursula Le Guin, Moorkock, Martin, Salvatore, and many others. The problem is the most of Italian publisher translate most of American fantasy production, whereas I know of no American publisher available to translate Italian authors. And they are good, in some case as good as the America counterparts. I understand I may seem a little bit a patriot (really I am, I love my country), but I would like if American readers may know how good are our writers. I do not like that Italy is known just because of opera, pizza, mafia and spaghetti. We have a lot of good artists, not just the ancient one, but the moder ones too. Sorry for long comment.--Fragola70 12:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

please delete this page, the author is absolutely not known to be reliable.
Wikipedia is DEFINITIVELY NOT a directory on which anybody can proclaim himself a famed expert. Please don't continue to overstep this elementary rule--Jbw2 (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

an additional search through universities libraries (and simply through Amazon.com) shows mr. Judicibus has never ever published any book or reference publication. So please make the right decision ASAP about the pertinence of the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbw2 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

A basic wikipedia rule...
I was said an author can be introduced as a wikipedia entry as soon as this author has written at least two reference books (ISBN reference AND considered as a reference book by many famed university in the world). That's clearly NOT THE CASE about the work of Mr Judicibus so far. May be, this author will soon publish this prerequisit work, and so I would be glad to welcome him as the expert he aspires to be. Thanks for your comprehension, I'm sorry to be so strict about reference, but that's the basic science discipline !--Jbw2 (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

But anyway, please be a little modest : don't enter any author as a major event for the year ! (I've removed Mr Judicibus from the main event list for 1960, I really think this year has been coined by more relevant events--Jbw2 (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

the article "Dario de Judicibus" is a shame for wikipedia project !
This person is simply an usurpator : he is neither a journalist (cf. hte previous posts), nor a real author (absolutely not published, no books, no ibsn,...), just a self proclaimed so called web expert ! a blogger beyon millions of other public bloggers !

It's really time to delete ALL the post about M. de judicibus (in french, english and italian). please do it to ensure the full credibility to our favorite encyclopedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.33.77.151 (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * This is a troll.--Dejudicibus (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

A vanity entry ! to be suppressed ASAP
Encore une mention à ce sinistre vandale qui parasite l'oeuvre de wikipedia depuis des mois : dario de judicibus, auteur autoproclamé en mal d'une notoriété non méritée ! je suis épuisé de "chasser" les vandalismes causé par ce soit-disant écrivain inconnu et non publié. Comment faire pour qu'une fois pour toute, n'importe quel bloggeur ne soit traité par wikipedia comme Victor Hugo, Goethe ou Dante ? Comment éviter que toute demande de suppression de page de ce monsieur judicibus, largement plébisciter au demeurant par la plupart des wikipédiens, soit à nouveau remise en ligne par ce monsieur et ses sbires (ou devrais-je dire ses aliases ; dejudicibus et fragola70 et bien d'autres sont les memes !) ? Merci à un administrateur de wikipedia global de prendre les mesures qui s'imposent ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.68.44.206 (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE MR "VANITY"
Could you please Mr Judicibus, stop to use wikipedia as a platform for your self-prmotion. We know all your very efficient lobbying with italian administrator, so please be kind enough to definitively stop to infiltrate te other wikiproject with links to your so-called quotes and other vanity entries (P. Loet --81.49.222.77 (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC))