User talk:Dekisugi/Archive

elochai redirect
I contested the speedy deletion tag that you had on the elochai redirect to God because I googled the term and found this: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006021710312. I had a short amount of time and I was doing a little new page patrolling. I don't go patrolling much. Royal broil 22:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

thenettimes.com spammer
Saw your reverts on this spammer.. good work. I'm hoping it's a one shot vandal, but if it recurs you might want to bring the idiot up at WP:WPSPAM. Tabercil (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

eHarmony Revert
Good work on this edit - strange vandalism. :) Tiggerjay (talk) 07:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflict
Probably an Edit conflict. I've got like 10 of them dealing with this issue. My apologies if I did something wrong. x42bn6 Talk Mess 15:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Good Job with Matthew98
Heh, that could have got worse. It's a good thing you reported him because I'm not absolutely sure how to report someone myself. I get lost easily on Wiki. In the end he spammed 17 articles with his websites. Yet again. Good Job. =D '''An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor-  Away.. ''' (talk)(contribs) 23:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage
Oh my god! what on Earth are you thinking having a userpage like that? Vandal fighting isn't a game and having a page designed to goad vandals into vandalising your userpage helps the encylopedia how? Take it from someone whose been fighting vandals for a very long time, counters, silly graphics, direct messages to vandals, serve no purpose except to increase the drama and fun for the vandals. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 00:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm making the font size smaller. In my other monitor, it's not so big. Reverting vandals and spammer is actually why I'm here. The pictures are valid and being used in many user pages. So far, there is a little increase of vandalism of my userpage. I don't think my userpage will increase vandalism in general. Dekisugi (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Signature in template
Hello Dekisugi, the tildes on User:Dekisugi/Reported have been replace with your signature. I think you can fix this with, otherwise the date is incorrect. Regards --Oxymoron83 16:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Reverted EEP? Erlang Enhancement Propoasal?
EEP also stands for Erlang Enhancement Proposal? Why is not at not appropriate? Please explain.

re: Reverted EEP? Erlang Enhancement Propoasal?
Immediately after posting I wondered if it was a good idea to provide the external link.

I don't have the knowledge to write a worthwhile article on the EEP though, would it be correct to mention it in the disambiguation page, refer to the main Erlang (the programming language) page and link to the EEP from there?

If not, what whould you suggest, given that I'm not the right person to write that article?

Thanks.

Eagle Club Group
I suggest that you talk with us on this articles talk page to see what conclusion we can get to.--Emma44 (talk) 11:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

We shall try and do what you say on this article, but keep on going to its talk page for more details and also please revome the tag. We hope we can come to a friendly conclusion.--Kushi13 (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

DCHealth
I tried contesting your speedy deletion of donor offspring health page....not sure if you received my message, so I'm trying here. I believe the page parallels another page that is currently on wikipedia - donor sibling registry. can you tell me how the two are portrayed differently and why one is acceptable and the other is not? I am happy to make modifications. Thanks. --DCHealth (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the insult left on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

You spoilt my fun! :-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChilledChick (talk • contribs) 17:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Why send me the welcome letter now?
Why do that when you've been having a go at me all day! :-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChilledChick (talk • contribs) 17:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

The external link I put is relevant to the topic
I put an external link to the article "List of universities in Indonesia". I feel that the universities listed on the article is very incomplete. Therefore, I put a link to a source which lists universities in Indonesia more comprehensively.

I believe that the link would be useful to anyone who looks for a complete list of universities in Indonesia. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Budiaman (talk • contribs) 12:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Should I just copy the materials right from the source?
Hi!

If I can't put an external link to that list, should I just copy the list to the wikipedia article.

I have to tell that Indonesian government is not too developed in terms of mantaining official website.

You should see that this article "http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Departemen_Pendidikan_Nasional_Republik_Indonesia", links to the government's website "http://www.depdiknas.go.id" which is INACTIVE.

So...

CAN I RIP THE LIST FROM http://www.webometrics.info/university_by_country.asp?country=id

AND PUT A LINK TO THE SOURCE?

I am in no way affiliated to the source and genuinely wanted to improve the article for the interest of people looking for information about education in Indonesia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Budiaman (talk • contribs) 12:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

External Links to legal Musical Scores/Essays
Hi there Dekisugi !

You've just removed a number of links to legal musical score (i.e. sheetmusic) examples. Example:
 * Kurze Schatten II essay (score sample)

They links were placed there for a particular reason:
 * to give the reader the chance to examine the music!

Will you please change the things back? Or do you expect me to do that? Dells (talk) 21:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Maby you can give a more extensive/explicit reason than a 2 second copy-paste of "per WP:EL, WP:SPAM and WP:NOT."??? Dells (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

You know, I'll accept it! Some of the score samples on the page Brian Ferneyhough have been there for more than a year: check...

I don't think all of those guidelines are good. (Also, I believe there's nothing wrong with Amazon, and there's nothing wrong with linking in things like .)

Bye-bye Dells (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Vandal's indef blocked now. Regards, Hús  ö  nd  21:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

FICPI page
Hi, I was working on the FICPI page to expand the information there - I am the current Secretary General - but my changes got reversed. I am happy to do this again, but how do I stop the changes getting reversed? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JulianCrump (talk • contribs) 22:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

i would like o copy the article from gothic art
--Chiar eu (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Pimpbruthr
You have a poor understanding of what's a sockpuppetting activity. Read WP:SOCK.

1. Many reasons are acknowledge as allowable for operating multiple concurrent accounts. Freely you may do so, just not as a tool of double-voting (so to speak). 2. Usernames will be blocked and the users compelled to take up different names and there is nothing in the nature of a 'sockpuppeting' arrangement about that at all.

Nice try. But I'm afraid it has ended up with me laughing at you for it. Bye. MostPimpBruthr (talk) 11:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Well that really shut you up. Keep together now.MostPimpBruthr (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

image
what is inapropriate about an image of sodomy on an article about sodomy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ah0000000ga (talk • contribs) 12:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

warnings
why are you threatening me with blocking me? what is inappropriate about an image of human sexual behavior (anal sex) in the article on human sexual behavior? I only added it in one time. There is no again. Please take me seriously and answer my questions. Are you an admin? What policy bans such images? Both sodomy and human sexual behavior already had explicit images of sex. So what is inappropriate of my image? I am confused.Ah0000000ga (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * "I only added it in one time". Actually six times. Tonywalton Talk 13:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

vandalism
they have? what vandalism is that? where has it been reported? i don't understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ah0000000ga (talk • contribs) 13:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah0000000ga has a point. While I agree the image is unencyclopædic and does not appear to add anything at all to the articles in question, it is not being added "randomly". Please, Ah0000000ga and Dekisugi, discuss this further. How, Ah0000000ga, do you think the image imprves the articles to which you added it? Merely adding it "because you can" looks rather like you trying to make some sort of a point. Tonywalton Talk 13:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I do agree that it's "unencyclopædic", by the way, and (even on the articles where it was added) only highly marginally appropriate. If it turned up on, say My Little Pony, now - that would be inappropriate. Let's see what happens... Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 15:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandal revert on my userpage
Thanks for that. Tonywalton Talk 19:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. It's my turn now. :-) Dekisugi (talk) 19:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

About Cumberland snakeman
sorry, didnt mean to put this here. could you please cheack that out though? and the talk page for my explantion? thanks

external link
I apologize, i didnt know. Thanks for your message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emoxion (talk • contribs) 16:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Lennon
I thank you for your anti-vandal work on the John Lennon page. Wonderful stuff. --andreasegde (talk) 19:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

An interesting thing in the Signpost
I don't know if you read the Signpost, but there's an interesting thing in this week's edition's In the News section - the study by the University of Minnesota. Apparently ''The U of M study estimated a probability of less than one-half percent (0.0037) that the typical viewing of a Wikipedia article would find it in a damaged (vandalised) state. '' Just goes to show that the vandal-fighting is worth it! A PDF is available of the whole study so that'll give me something to read on the train when I go to my family's house tomorrow for Xmas. Happy holidays! Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 00:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the news. Yes, interesting and a good news one. Have a nice holiday!! Dekisugi (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

How to be a Spam Patroller
I am interested in being a spam patroller and wonder how I be one. Is it a voluntarily thing like a new page patroller or recent page patroller, or is it a mandatory Wikipedia appointing position. Please give me a reply whenever you are available and my user name is Commonwealth empire. Thank you for taking consideration.

Kumar Muthalagappan
Hi! I absolutely agree with you to delete this article asap. Yet, I was just thinking about an AfD while you tagged the article for speedy deletion. Do you, however, think speedy deletion is justified? Wouldn't an AfD-discussion be better? --Fromgermany (talk) 12:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The article was already speedy deleted before (see the log). The content is a blatant advertising related to other article he created and because he is a manager of a hotel. I'd prefer CSD rather than discussing at AfD. Dekisugi (talk) 12:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for stating your case. I hope this article will indeed disappear as soon as possible. Advertising is a big "sin" within WIKIPEDIA. And very rightly so. ;-) --Fromgermany (talk) 12:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

link/ changes to Pharmaceutical company, Spectroscopy, Applied Biosystems, and Laboratory automation
Hi,

I was adding the links in not for search engines or for advertising/ promotion, but if you were to look at the website you will see that I am genuinely trying to provide an online library for un-biased press and news concerning products and equipment in these categories which I feel has relevance for further reading for these topics as external links.

I know these links are useful to others wanting to know more about the products involved in these scientific fields.

I also intend to start up an article library in the near future that I could use to add more reference to Wikipedia itself.

How do i take this further? I am alarmed that I am seen as some shady operator for doing this!

Please comment me back as to why you feel my external references/ links are not good enough or are not relevant to these categories on: www.modern-laboratory.com so then at least I can take this issue up further before I submit anything again.

I look forward to hearing from you, otherwise I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year :)

Pete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modlab (talk • contribs) 11:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

cheers for that :)

I can see why I look like a spammer at least. But perhaps occasionally you may at least look at the links/ content first off before deleting, as I don't think mine were obviously spam or you could have at least flagged up a warning so I could have done something about it first, rather than deleting me straight away - it could be classed as vandalism! :P

Anyway I'll resubmit everything as a suggestion instead if that helps.

(nice troll penis story btw) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modlab (talk • contribs) 11:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

gotcha! cheers for the advice. Probably doesn't help that I haven't set up my user page yet either. Anyway I have last minute Christmas Shopping to do and being on Wikipedia isn't going to help me :)

Thanks again and Merry Christmas.

Pete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modlab (talk • contribs) 11:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Dekisugi--thank you for the feedback regarding my link. I appreciate the fact that you have removed the link fearing it appears to be promotional material. I suppose the front page of the site itself does appear promotional as I do advertise sharing the training program --however, my intent was to share the actual information in the program itself. How do you suggest I do this without violoating the wiki protocol? thanks--toetag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forensicflies (talk • contribs) 11:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Bowls external links cleanup
Thanks for the cleanup of the external links at Bowls. It is a very elegant and forceful solution and hopefully will have the desired effect. -- Mattinbgn\talk 13:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Glad to help. Dekisugi (talk) 13:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Usenet Moron
Dekisugi, the Usenet personality I'm describing definitely exists. You've probably seen him. I may not have described him adequately, but he cetainly exists. Why would you say that this content is inappropriate?

Dil Pickles
Hi, may i request that you revert this article back to how it was before my edits today but after my edits last week, as i believe my edits last week were correct. thank you - TheProf07 p.s. dont think i'm here to ruin articles, im just trying to make this one better. Remember i'm new to this :) - TheProf07

oh, and i didnt use a twinkle, i dont even know what one is! plz let me know what you mean? - The Prof07

Thanks, i need all the help i can get, lol. wikipedia is a hard place. thats why i'd rather look than edit, but i know alot about that charater and knew i could help by adding new information. again, thanks for your help and MERRY CHRISTMAS ! - TheProf07

I'd just like to say that Ashley west is fairly notable and if you search for him in google he's one of the first thing that comes up.

Reverts
Hi, reverts should be reserved for vandalism. I would suggest that instead of reverting the changes made to Arneis you should try to improve it to meet WP:MOS. --Raistlin (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's the way to do it ! Good job :) --Raistlin (talk) 13:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The thing is that the first time I saw, I didn't check the history of the page first. A common false positive recent patrolling. Dekisugi (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Reverts made to links inserted by user Jesusz
Hi Dekisugi...I'm sorry but I thought that promoting a site that is supposed to be a general service of interest for the readers of those articles was not going to be asumed as spam, specially when it's a free site. I've read more deeply some of the links you gave me and have understood it all a bit better. Anyway I saw in the Geocoded photograph some link to sites like Panoramio or Flickr, online communities like my site, and that made me insert the links... as you may guess I'm quite new to the wikipedia...

Do you think I could start by starting an article about my site...and then wait for impartial edits? thanks for your help...

Cheers Jesusz (talk) 13:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user and talk page! Addhoc (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of the page titled "Terry's law"
This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given is: This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense (CSD G1).

I created this page because I wanted to point out that certain internet message board discussions are completely and utterly pointless, and wanted to create a companion to Godwin's law which would help counteract the never ending slew of stupid comments from seventeen year old stoners who think the are experts on everything drug related, even though they only ever smoked a joint or two. I really do not see how it is any more "patent nonsense" than Godwin's law, upon which it is based. Why not give it time and see how it fares out? Regarding the "the text is unsalvageably incoherent" comment. Perhaps one of your more verbose admins would like to correct the grammatical errors, rather than insulting those who try to make a contribution. I would also like to point out that this is my first contribution to wikipedia, so some of the links may be missing or may have been placed incorrectly. I apologise if this is the case.

Terry J O&#39;Dowd (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Terry J O'Dowd


 * Use hangon template please. I'm not an admin. Can't delete any articles. Dekisugi (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I did use the {hangon} template, but it was deleted before I had the chance to give my explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry J O'Dowd (talk • contribs) 16:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Regarding "Skydiving" External Links
Dear Dekisugi,

Many of the links that (I believe) you've removed from the "Skydiving" ("Parachuting") entry were useful to those hoping to learn about skydiving. I've reposted two widely accepted and respected resources for skydiving information that you've removed (links to the USPA and dropzone.com).

Skydive Santa Barbara was linked because we frequently prove a great source of detailed skydiving information to those researching the sport. If one hopes to research skydiving, access to professionals in the field seems the best route to take.

I can understand if you hope to avoid an excess of links by deleting those belonging to specific drop zones (though I think it unfortunate and a disservice to those hoping to gather details). But if at all possible, I would like to relink to several other national parachuting organizations (Canada, South Africa, England and so forth) that keep the sport regulated and safe for all skydivers internationally. People can then explore how skydiving differs culturally, and also examine the differences in regulations across borders.

Blue Skies,

Skydive Santa Barbara —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.161.187 (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Confused
Sorry, I am new at this and confused. Why is this link http://www.powertechnology.com/ramanspectroscopy.asp allowed on Spectroscopy? Thanks for your help.

Bob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvoorhees (talk • contribs) 17:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Dekisugi (talk) 18:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Aftab Ahmed Vohra
Dekisugi ... I see you reverted a number of recent edits to Aftab Ahmed Vohra and nominated this article for deletion via WP:PROD. I have reverted the entire article back to its state in July 2007, which included removing the PROD tag, as explained at Talk:Aftab Ahmed Vohra. This version is substantially unchanged from the version that was taken to AFD in 2006 and which passed through as a 'no consensus'. I am wondering if you would consider withdrawing your deletion nomination to allow the article to re-progress forward from this point for a period of time? Or would you rather I take this to AFD as a 'non-progressed' article for re-evaluation. Note that I was going to convert your PROD to an AFD before I looked at the edit history of the article because articles previously considered at AFD shouldn't be PROD'd (that's one of the PROD-exclusion criteria listed at WP:PROD). If you are ok with my not taking this to AFD in its current state, I would consider that a type of "withdrawn nomination", which happens from time to time at AFD. What do you think? --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Bin Xie
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Bin Xie. The reason is:
 * Being a finalist for the Archibald Prize is enough importance.

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC) עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Osho edits
Please review discussion page on this matter before reverting again. I removed spam. I did not add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semitransgenic (talk • contribs) 12:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I see what happened, I had removed spam from the page and some one reverted to the old version, which I undid, but had to undo again because there were issues in the referencing as a result of spam removal, which I then addressed. Thanks Semitransgenic (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

OK I have to revert again, the reference list is messed up, I am going back to the version that has linking in the main body of the text removed, I was allowing the external links at the bottom of the page as there does not seem to be a copyright issue. Semitransgenic (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Danube Delta
I didnt want to remove any text, i just wanted to improve the article. But when I saved the page, a good portion of what has been weitten, and most of what I wrote was gone. I dont know why. I am having some troubles with my Safari browser, I use it on Windows and it doesnt recognise apostrophes. After an apostophe it just stops reading the text, the text just dissapears. Maybe it is the same, the article of the Danube Delta stopped when I introduced bullets. What should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by IonutC (talk • contribs) 12:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I managed to restore the text. Hope this wouldnt happen anymore. I am new around here and I guess I am due to make a lot mistakes. Yesterday I did something to the sandbox and somebody warned me about vandalism. I can assure you I am a serious user, just that for the moment I dont know how to use but the first five buttons of the editing page :) When I will have the time I want to learn making tables.  --IonutC (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The Antichrist page
Thanks for undoing what that last user did. I had spent a good part of 30 minutes trying to find where my last edit had gone, copying and inserting same, and then noticing this crazy text about Intel! Gimme-a-break! I wish people would take these pages seriously!--MurderWatcher1 (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your note about vandalism
Hi, and thanks for your note. To reassure you, I was not trying to vandalise that particular page. I was actually trying to delete it on the basis that it has been the subject of serious vandalism (edit of 10.27am, 27 Dec 2007) which included highly defamatory material. Can you please tell me how to go about getting the page deleted to avoid further vandalism? Any error on my part was purely inexperience. Obviously, I have no wish to be banned/blocked. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by AGrimble2 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Your last note
Many thanks for your note, and I will do that. AGrimble2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AGrimble2 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Who The Hell Was St.George Anyway?
Hi, can you please respond to the comments made about the deletion of the record for Who The Hell Was St.George Anwyay? Particular regarding why other less notable fanzine (ie ones that are not the worlds longest running etc) are still available as an entry.

I under stand the need for moderation so just need to iknow what was done incorrectly to assist with any future edits etc

Thanks

User:darryl1978 09:16, 21 January 2008

Links added
Hello there, I think it's really fantastic that you help to ensure that Wikipedia isn't abused - it's a great resource and I use it all the time to get info. I think you're doing a really important job - if lots of spamming and advertising was allowed then it would really devalue Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've posted a few messages on my user page asking me not to spam. I'm a confused because the links are not identical, they are specific to town guides on the site French Property Links, which I find has very valuable information on many French towns. I think the information I have added to the articles is useful and enhances Wikipedia - I'm certainly not trying to spam. Best wishes, User:Francomaniac 10:38, 15 January 2008

Freeport braintree
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Freeport braintree. The reason is:
 * About a place, not a company - not subject to CSD A7

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

List of All Grown Up! episodes
Hi again, im assuming your admin, if im wrong please point me in the right direction. In the article List of All Grown Up! episodes, a user with a record for edit wars has removed some information without valid reason and in my opinion it is vital information to the artilce. Can you maybe look it over and (if the user is wrong) fix it? The user in question is User:The Rogue Penguin. Thanks for listening TheProf07 (talk) 11:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
I'd just like to say thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Cheers, Weirdy (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Serial Vandal
Please can you help me combat a serial vandal. User:72.148.144.40 continues to vandalise All Grown Up!, Chuckie Finster, Candi Milo & Nancy Cartwright. Its becoming a daily event, this really needs to be dealt with by admin! TheProf07 (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I've reported him, it looks like he was blocked for a month. Any chance you can add these pages to your watchlist? TheProf07 (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the quick revert of the vandalism on my user page. :-) IronGargoyle (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

How the fuck am I vandalisng Wikipedia, It's free to edit! This is a free world! I bet that the majority of people agree with me who live in Brixworth! Why do you care what I put? TWAT! Math O' Frith, Walgrave, Northamptonshire, 15 years old, wants to be sexually stalked. Is a CRAP centre back. PS. I have knobcheese. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frithleeds (talk • contribs) 10:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Revert
Thanks for the revert: I deleted his vanity page. "We all owe him our lives for the kindness he shows every living creature" is a sample. Regards,  Acroterion  (talk)  13:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

TWINKLE Problems
Hello again Dekisugi, as i know you yourself use Twinkle. I thought i'd best ask you this question. My own twinkle has completely disappeared! Did yours? If so how did you get it back? I tried removeing it and putting it back but it still wont show. I hope its not lost forever, as i'd be lost without it now! Thanks TheProf07 (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I was hoping it was a Twinkle problem and not a problem with my browser. I refreshed it, that didnt work. I'm useing Opera which is meant to be fine with it. And up to now it has been! Maybe it'll come back by its self!? Anyway, thanks for your help. TheProf07 (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the problem now. I switched from Opera to Mozilla Firefox. Again thanks for your friendly help:) -- TheProf07 (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your assistance against V-Dash's latest splurge of vandalism~! -Sukecchi (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome Dekisugi (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks again...this is getting old. -Sukecchi (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
Hello again Dekisugi. I was just wondering what you'd think about being nominated for adminship? Would you like it? Are you against it? Personally, i think you deserve at least a shot at adminship. Hope to hear from you soon:) - TheProf 07 20:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked? For a vandalism-account ony?

 * Mmm I'm looking into it. I don't understand the block either. -- lucasbfr  talk 11:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I can't believe what i'm seeing here. Dekisugi is committed to the fight against vandalism! This incident may harm his chances of adminship, adminship being something which he clearly deserves! I'm very disappointed with this. Users like me and Dekisugi need all the help we can get in our fight against vandalism. We don't need the admins helping the vandals out! TheProf | 2007 12:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Now worries, TheProf07. I think there was a mistake of blocking somebody. There was a case of a vandal trying to mimick my username and pretending I was vandalizing. Sometimesa an admin got stressed with vandals and mixed up. Oh, that's why I'd like to decline your offer for adminship at the moment. Also my record shows only vandalism fighting activities. I've not yet any records on serious editing. Perhaps, later, but thanks for offering me. And please let me know if you want to request yours. Anyway, thanks Lucasbfr. This is the first time I saw "I'm blocked!". :-) Dekisugi (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

(unindent) By the way, I'm still being blocked, maybe because my IP has not yet been unblocked. So I'll wait for such an explanation from the admin that blocked me. Or shall I put unblock here? Maybe I should wait until the block expires: This block has been set to expire: 11:40, 25 February 2008.. Dekisugi (talk) 13:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops, mea culpa. I confused you with another user. Really sorry about that. I guess the autoblock has expired now. Once again, sorry! utcursch | talk 14:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * That's okay, utcursh. No heart feeling. On the bright side, you gave me a good lesson of how awful to get blocked. ;-) Oh, and now I also understand what is autoblock and what is direct block. :-) Dekisugi (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Uh oh, I still cannot edit with my IP address = 82.215.32.86. I guess I'll wait til tomorrow. Dekisugi (talk) 15:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Found and lifted the autoblock. Just FYI, if that happens again (and I hope it won't !), our only tool to lift autoblock is doing a ctrl+f on Special:ipblocklist. That's why we usually need the autoblock id (which was #797818 in your case) to find the blocks more easily. Anyway, all should be good now, I'm glad that was sorted out :). -- lucasbfr  talk 17:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

"You've been reported to the officials"
Hi Dekisugi - I noticed your message on User talk:Bubsisbubs. Can I ask you to reconsider using such messages? Similar templates have been deleted in the past (see this discussion for the views expressed in the past). It might encourage someone to go out in a "blaze of glory" before being blocked, for example. Regards, BencherliteTalk 11:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * hhm... I didn't know such a discussion. I'll reconsider to use it in the future. Thanks. Dekisugi (talk) 12:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Recent reversion
Hi Dekisugi. I used Wikipedia recently to look up the word 'dross'. I am new to this but I thought that I could improve the entry a little. I see that my addition has instantly been branded as 'vandalism' and has been removed. I may have made a mistake here but my intention was not to cause vandalism. Is this because I used the word 'rubbish' in my definition? Can anything be done about removing the vandalism 'charge' against me? - Added to revision - I could use a little help here. Will you reply to this message please? The entry I made was reverted in just a few minutes and I sent my original message for help shortly afterwards. This was quite some time ago. Doctormartyn (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Who fandom
Hey, I noticed you contributed to the Doctor Who fandom article. I was wondering, because of that, if you might be willing to help edit the page on Fan History about the Doctor Who fandom? Fan History's entry is intended to be a bit more comprehensive and all encompassing as Fan History is a wiki dedicated to documenting and preserving as much fandom history as it can. The Doctor Who article could really use some one familiar with wiki editing and Doctor Who fandom knowledge to make it better. :) If you can help, it would very much be appreciated. --FanHistory (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert...
...of vandalism on my talk page. It's always appreciated. Xymmax (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Bangclang
Thanks. I still haven't worked out all the policies on here and was trying to work out how to ban this user due to the constant vandalism. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You can report him/her to WP:AIAV. Dekisugi (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Back as Bangclang2 by the looks of it. Are we able to block IPs? Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noticed that. I've put WP:SOCK tag on him/her userpage. Dekisugi (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Who are you??? I don't care it. But yu can't stop me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Died2 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Gruntlord6b
Don't forget User:Gruntlord6b. KnightLago (talk) 15:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are now a, b, c.. etc. Dekisugi (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

good job with the bison
wahoo! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.39.20 (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you were right, Parvonia doesnt deserve an article...after all it's Pavonia and its nonsense. You were right I was wrong. Posted by Horror_Punk_Ed22 16:53 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
I will stop vandalizing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geo 259 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I dont like you —Preceding unsigned comment added by No1no1o (talk • contribs) 00:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

You are sold out!
why do you see fit to remove links to the audiotube site - which is amazingly add-free, and you you leave links to big companies like last.fm ? whats your problem? we arent spamming the site but are adding quality links to a great resource. i would appreciate it if you would stop what you are doing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heisycat (talk • contribs) 13:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

You racist! The ACLU is gonna be on you!
How dare you delete this LATIO'S edits! I already called them about other racist members, and I will report YOU!-EmptyWalls666 (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Too late. ;-) Dekisugi (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Just ignore him, he is using open proxies to evade his block because he is a User:Felipe Garcia sockpuppet. And if he vandalises again just Revert, block and ignore revert all his edits no matter what they are. Momusufan (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

--Pugnexcessum909 (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)== How was it vandalism if it was the truth? ==

My edits to Chris Lawrence's page was vandalism? How? Was it not the truth - i am close friends with Chris (i'm the younger student in the anecdote).

Not a test post ;)
Greetings, just so you know, the so called test post in the infernal page that i put up is indeed a valid fact, so i'd appreciate it not being removed, or a reason why it is beyond the current statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haddyfantastic (talk • contribs) 11:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Alexboys Entry
Hello, what can I do to be listed without db-spam entry? Eurocreme is a porn company also and they are listed on wikipedia. Please assist what is not ok for you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexboys (talk • contribs) 14:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Rental Management Software
How was what I posted any different than what is already there? The current listing is clearly advertising for Solutions by Computer. Point-of-Rental (talk) 02:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

My Edits to frindle
Unless you don't know what day it is... You should understand my I made the edit. You do have the power and the responsibility to warn and revert me, but is it so much to ask not to be give the same warning a a truely malicous vandal? I only intended it as an april fool's joke, yet I get a freakin' pre-written message... At the very least you could have put one that say how it is inappropriate to make april fools jokes... --Clockglock5 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers
For the user talkpage revert. It was very much appreciated :) AngelOfSadness  talk  16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Your welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

aqueduct
Hi, Dekisugi. Thanks for picking up that my editing did something strange to all the accent marks. I'm new at this.

Can you please also change the word poo back to dirt ... which was my intention. thanks. F9 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.226.130.158 (talk) 18:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

White Hot Property

If you examine the text, you will see that it is objective prose - it does not, in any way advertise an service or a company. It simply defines a term which is often used among British property professionals to describe a certain type of property. Please clarify why you think the page is 'blatent advertising'

Grant Hall (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you realy think it is a promotional link, could you please spend few minuts digging the conents of the link and consider your decision for re-justification. I belive my intention was pure, And I just want to help the world. It is up to you now.

Thanks Who Am I? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohom (talk • contribs) 11:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If you don't have enough time to dig the pages, Here is short discription of the conent I linked. It talks about anciant indian treat meant availiable for lukemia, and briefs a persons life time research on that, it pathetic and hard to here that you treaed that persons effort as "prmo"

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohom (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for the revert on the vandal on my talk page, I have just repaid the deed. :-) --Triwbe (talk) 11:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 13:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded the page Forex Brokers, and you redirected it to Forex Exchange Market. These two subjects are not the same though. I uploaded a tutorial that I wrote, on how to choose a corect Broker. Can you please leave a message on the discussion page of Forex Brokers, just to explain me why you did that? Please explain what's wrong there, and then I will do what's appropriate to wikipedia. I've read a lot of wiki regulations, and sometimes it is quite complicated. So please explain before deleting again. THAN YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Igalstl (talk • contribs) 06:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

bcoz pov forking
Content forking

bcoz, pov forking.(promoted hatred) cut and paste from convenience source by pov forker. Danceneveril (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The Old Hat Restaurant
Excuse me sir: you have not heard of the old hat restaurant. We are a wonderful place to get a bite to eat, have local patrons, and have a good chef. Therefore, it is notable for an encyclodpedia. Please do not try to delete good, wholesome content. And drop by for some good food! The Old Hat Restaurant (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi,... How can i add the logo of the website in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Primequbit (talk • contribs) 10:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
It's no hoax, I am trying to work on this and improve it. Many thanks. DrHollisCollier (talk) 10:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I am so sorry!
I will stop editing external links in wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thkim75 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Policy on section title length?
Hi. I have a question. I think succinct section titles are more appropriate than lengthy ones, so long as they accurately summarize the section, which is why I shortened a couple in the Expelled (film) article, but then someone reverted it, claiming "POV" edits. I looked all over the Namespace for a policy relating to section title lengths, but couldn't find out. Any ideas? Nightscream (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Corn on the Cobby
I was being serious!! I'm not one of those pug-troubling vandals. I would never hurt a pug. Pug power (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Mountain Pointe High School
You recently deleted much of the article of Mountain Pointe High School, which has been that way for months (check the history/past editors have seen and fixed bits of it). It is now a stub, so can you revert it back to the way it was before? At Mountain Pointe the Ahwatukee Bowl, athletics, etc. are notable sensible topics. Thanks

I do not know why are you giving me a warning??
Hi !

I got the message from you, but i do not understand why are you warning me. I have seen this articles on wikipedia a while back now and I wrote to wikipedia about the absurdity and the propaganda requesting a locking of the article and an independent administrator to do the changes that can come out in a discussion about the articles.

It's a Greek who is writing about the history of my country and i think as it is my history and he is perverting it, I have to have my say in it.

Is not a normal case of two people arguing about history, this case it's a lot deeper.

Did you know that the Greek government has still in power the war law with Albania and they still consider them selves in war with us and had the army ready to invade south Albania in 1997/ we are in 21st century I remind you.

Also that through the Orthodox church and other government institutions they are repeatedly trying to convert Albanians in the south not to Orthodox but to Greeks even by changing their names, giving them Greek citizenship and to find work in Greece for the past 17 years you had to say that you are from Noeth Epirus and that you are Greek.

Greece has ethnically cleansed of all the Cam Population /Albanian Speaking/Albanian/ the Cameria region and has followed an assimilation policy of the Arvanities also who are Albanian speaking population/Albainans.

I can Write a book about the injustice they have done through centuries to us, but I'm willing to forgive and forget. Wikipedia is a famous international site and I can not let the history of my country to be perverted like this. They have millions of sites where they boast about the world owing everything to them and i have no problem for them to do that between them as much as they want.

But not here I do not think it serves to this site well to be a place of a countries propaganda and animosity towards another one.

Thank you

Regards

Jon--jon (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi !

Thanks for witting back !

You say that I deleted a lot of so called references in this case. I invite you to take a look at their references that I have deleted.

The references I have deleted are the one sided once most of them Greek. I have millions of writers and articles that would be better at bringing a more truthful history based on evidence and facts.

About what i wrote above, I have names, pictures, documents and government sources that can back up every bit that i wrote.

That's what I would like to do. Write an article based on facts or at least on well known impartial sources.

I took your advise and opened the discussion page. I still think that doing anything on that page is useless.The reason being is that, even though somebody proves a point there are no changes made to the article. Again I invite you to have a look and judge for your self. That is the reason why I would like to have an impartial administrator to make changes for all the points that are proven and lock the article to protect it from any other undiscussed editing.

Thanks

Regards

Jon --jon (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DetiJon (talk • contribs) 16:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations
You have achieved the highest level of anti-vandalism glory. check this out. Your very own hate account! Keep up the great work! Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 18:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations
You have archived to be rude and childish.

There is no hate any where in my writings. I'm simply writing some events and facts to help somebody who does not know the reality of the region understand my point of view.

Your behavior is very childish and rude ! If you were interested in the discussion you could have started with a question or something...

Unless you are on the receiving end and the truth hurts you.

Peace !

Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by DetiJon (talk • contribs) 16:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Malaguti
The user has continued to add unsourced information and corporate information to the article. Gentle warnings havent helped. He has come back as an IP now which I have notified as a sock here. He just does not see the point about it...hmpf! Prashanthns (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

What do i do if i want to create a new article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cornishviking (talk • contribs) 18:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Help
Dekisugi, Please help. I'm lost. Is it inappropriate to add an author biography to Wikipedia? Thanks so much and gads there's some hate on your page. AnastasiaRabiyah (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much for replying to me and offering me all the helpful info! I'll just lurk around until I get a better grip of things here. That's the safest bet, I think.

AnastasiaRabiyah (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

OK I GET IT!
JUST STOP!

Officer cadet Wales
Come on. Officer cadet Wales = Fireman Sam is funny! --Dfgh123 (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

so i guess no putting back the blob, weapon xi and lumber jack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexDotta (talk • contribs) 12:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

you just get back with me with that

Thanks
...for this!Prashanthns (talk) 12:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

message me, or whatever —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexDotta (talk • contribs) 12:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

if im allowed permission to them back on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexDotta (talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Who is Dekisugi
Who is Dekisugi?

Thanks Dekisugi!
Thanks Dekisugi for answering my question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bronzert (talk • contribs) 18:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

How did you do that
In relation to all the nonsense hagger? and 'over redirect' what does that mean? When i first saw that user i just wanted to let experts like you deal with it. What is the process, just press 'move' at the top to the location where it is supposed to be and everything will be fine? Thanks  Roadrunnerz45  (talk 2 me) 10:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

cory rooney page
Hi Dekisugi - I'm Cory Rooney's assistant and he requested his wikipedia page be changed to his new bio and that is why I changed it - can we take off the existing bio on him and put the new one up as he does not like several of the references. Please let me know? Rhythm2firewater (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

cory rooney page2
Hi Dekisugi - In the interim is it possible to take down the Cory Rooney wikipedia page, if I am not able to edit it? There is false information listed regarding his life on that page and we would be appreciative if the false information was not posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhythm2firewater (talk • contribs) 22:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

boa
hey, wondered why the reversal of the boa reference ?Just2minutes (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Subjudicy
The page is in contravention to subjudicy laws in the UK, there are numerous things in the page stated in a way in which to indicate fact, when these have not be proven in court. their is an ongoing criminal case. the press complaints commision is already looking into the way the press have handled and continue to handle this matter. this page should be removed until after the case has been tried. wiki is used by a lot of people and it could be founf that the informaition this contains (as a self proclaimed encyclopedia) could and may well sway a persons thoughts who may later end up as a jury member.

the page should be removed untill after the trial. it is breaking the law. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tolstoy999 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Raffle.it links
Hi, sorry not trying to spam but I understand your actions - thought I'd made a mistake the first time hence my repeat. The other external link is not unlike mine is it? The main reason for the addition of the main text is that we are currently re-inventing the raffle doing to it what's been done to bingo, auctions, etc. Can I add the text without a link? Appreciate your feedback.

Kind regards

Pasalot (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know about sandbox mode, i'll just type stuff in there now —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeebus853 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

excuse me
you reported me for my edit to stephen colbert.

but it's the truth

colbert is god.

so, freak a leak. get a life ok.

it's not like anyone trusts wikipedia for information, anyways.

at my school, we're not even allowed to use it

you fat fuck!

Excuse me, too!
I just created the page Clone (cell biology), and you redirected that to cloning. Trust me, the content I was adding is different from the subject matter of the latter article. So, I request you to refrain from making such attempts again. Moreover, I am finding it very difficult to impart an "independent existence" to the page I was trying to create.

Hoping for your kind cooperation.

Ketan Panchal, MBBS (talk) 15:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Your kind attention, please!
Why the page--clone (cell biology) is different from the one named cloning, and deserves to be not redirected


 * 1) Cloning is an artificial procedure, whereas a clone is a group of cells
 * 2) Clones of cell exist in nature even without deliberate attempts
 * 3) The concept of clonality (existence of different variety of clones of same cell-type) is very important and fundamental to many principles in immunology.
 * 4) I have searched Wikipedia extensively, and found no article that satisfactorily conveys the meaning of a "clone" in this sense.

Hope I have made myself sufficiently clear.

Hoping for mature understanding by one and all.

Ketan Panchal, MBBS (talk) 15:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

i DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I DID WRONG —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chain Gang Leader (talk • contribs) 16:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

My Talk Page
Not sure why is so eager to vandalize my userpage, but Thanks for helping to revert their shenanigans. It's appreciated. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

A quick thanks
You sure got to my user page faster than I! Just wnated to thank you :). Stealth (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! Stealth (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

edwin jagger
hi,

i am trying to write a profile of an english company that has contributed a great deal to the world of shaving - and a tailor as well, but i am very new to writing stuff for wikipedia - my pages got blocked straught away with you as a contact point - any advice?

if people (or even companies) are leaders in their field, does that merit them an entry or are companies excluded by the very fact that they might benefit from it commercially? i saw one for Geo F Trumper, which is very short, is that acceptable?

I don't want to do the wrong thing, but as someone who has grown up with bespoke clothing and businesses in England, i can say with conviction that there are some people that are quite special and who have had a profound affect on their little quarter of life.

honest advice (or telling off if appropriate) would be appreciated! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BespokeGentleman (talk • contribs) 12:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Weathering Steel
The link we first posted was to a data sheet at http://www.ajmarshall.com/corten.htm This was intended as a useful link to the properties of Corten weathering steel. The link was vandalised by a supplier of Corten who used the site to advertise their company rather than provide information. They removed our link. Since then it's been a bit of an edit war!

Corten (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

kool
u have a kool userpage :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Individualz (talk • contribs) 15:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Olivamine
We are not trying to advertise anything! We are simply trying to post information about an ingredient capable of repairing damaged and diseased skin. I don't see how my post/article was any different from the one on Noxema? Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 08science (talk • contribs) 16:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

sorry
i am trying to add some subject matter about myself, i am not sure how to do it, i do not mean to "do it wrong" can you please advise me. Zooook (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Reporting vandalism
I will not insert any further links to data sheets.

Is it acceptable for me to delete the links inserted by the other user who began the edit war? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corten (talk • contribs) 10:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Geography of China edits
I'm in the process of doing a major rewrite of this article. All the info I removed from the lead will be reinserted in the appropriate places. Can you please stop reverting me? --Chinasort (talk) 10:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you understand that the information I removed will be put back elsewhere? --Chinasort (talk) 10:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Replying on my talk page. --Chinasort (talk) 10:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The True Origin of Golf (whether you want to except it or not)
The Book] is a HIGHLY reliable source, whatever you may choose to believe. It was translated from it's origional Westron into English by the brilliant Professor J.R.R. Tolkien and was published as four seperate books(probably known to you as The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy) And though it may be mistaken by many to be fiction it is in fact the translation of a true and reliable historical document. The game of golf WAS invented during the Battle of the Green fields, but I see that the truth is simply too much for you to believe, so I will not argue with your decision to delete it, nor will I hold your lack of openmindedness against you. You have my sincere and best wishes. long may you live in joy as an esteemable wikipedia editor. DARKastheRAIN (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

People told me that Wikipedia was run by Zionists.
Thank you for confirming that it indeed is. ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dharmaji (talk • contribs) 22:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox (Computer Security) revert of edit
Dekisugi,

I noticed you reverted my edits - please let me know what it was that caused you to do that. I would appreciate in the future if you edit my edit or comment on what it is you didn't agree with.

- cloeven

Why?
Dear Dekisugi, why did you delete my nomination as adminsrator?? EnglandRules1966 (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

boomerang history
Why did you revert my edits to article: boomerang? You claim it was because my correction was not verifiable. What you really mean to say is that I did not cite a source. (That is very different than not verifiable.) The original version which you reverted to, however, also did not cite any sources. Then why did you revert my edit?

I am currently re-editing the page to include good sources. But please next time ask me nicely to provide a source rather than making me retype everything.

I see from the above comments that many other people have had the same problem with you. Hmm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemolithoautotroph (talk • contribs) 20:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
I will stop vandalizing

Chevron Corporation
what tag can be placed at the top of the article? there's some information that needs to be restored too. I'll work on that part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rent A Troop (talk • contribs) 06:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Nanocrystal Entry
The current NANOCRYSTAL entry improperly uses a trademark term - NANOCRYSTAL. Please advise as to the best procedure to remediate.

(cur) (last) 13:56, 14 May 2008 Dekisugi (Talk | contribs) m (2,533 bytes) (Reverted 1 edit by Cbauer1227 identified as vandalism to last revision by IEgreen.) (undo)

Please explain your refusal to amend the NANOCRYSTAL entry

Society for Editors and Proofreaders
So, what you're saying is that it isn't possible to include any text from another site, even if permission to use the material has been granted by the copyright owner/author? Or am I misunderstanding something, here?

Zog2 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

You replied: "Did you read the warning above? Say it with your own words, not copy paste. Wikipedia is not a mirror or a fork site. I'll give you some clues below..."

Thanks for the response. Yes. I am fully aware that Wikipedia is not a mirror/fork site, but all new pages have to start from somewhere, and I wouldn't have thought that using a single sentence and two bullet points from the home page of the external site (with permission from the site's owners), as an introduction to what the organisation is about, constituted 'mirroring' or 'forking' the site. Saying it your own words, in this case, rather negates the purpose of posting the 'quote' -- it is intended to be a concise 'mission statement', of sorts, and it is difficult to see how it could be re-worded satisfactorily. Also, on the topic of how a new page gets off the ground (and in reference to the point in G12 that says that one of the reasons meriting speedy deletion is that the page content is the work of one person), I note that the two tags were placed on the page within 1 (one!) minute of the initial page being created... Given this sort of speed of reaction, how is the page to ever get to the stage where more than one person has contributed to it?

--Zog2 (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Spammer mocking
How can you say I am a persistent spammer? can you eplain to me your powers? because it seems you act above the rules, we are putting links that we consider are relevant to users of wikipedia, no more no less.

Please explain me your criteria to clasify us as spammers.

Regards

Carlos (Carloscuzme (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC))

Thanks
Thank you for reverting Vandalism on my userpage --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 11:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Dekisugi (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks from me too. I've got something for you here. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me  18:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from Judge Floro
Oh, this is the first time that my user was vandalized. Without your help, I would have been a done deal. Thanks for your great contribution. I am lucky that unlike others', my user was only vandalized once. Regards. --Florentino floro (talk) 09:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Dekisugi (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks but
Thanks for supporting me when my good faith efforts at contributing to Wikipedia were so very, very obviously and misguidedly attacked by User:Kinu. It is heartening to realize that people do not view all editor actions as on equal footing and warranted and rational, which -- of course, this is very obvious, and goes without saying -- by extension means something about the editors who take such actions. On the other hand, what you are saying reminds me of a numbbot who might say that anyone who brings false charges before a "court" is blameless, while assuring the person who is charged that there will be a just outcome from a nameless and faceless "judge". But a just court immediately throws out and does not even listen to drummed up false charges, and a failure to do this right away gives no assurance to the person falsely charged. Quite the opposite, in fact. Daimerej (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Fa Cup
I have never heard the phrase "fa cup champions" A Minor edit to text box so that it reads "holders" or "winners" would read a lot better IMHO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Statto999 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Who do you work for? NISUnderover —Preceding unsigned comment added by NISundercover (talk • contribs) 18:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Progecad Srbija
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Progecad Srbija, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

C2K
hi recently i posted "In April/May, '08, a user, known only as NeoChivers, successfully breached security" on the C2K information page, may i ask what the problem with this change is? yours faithfully and sincerely leekspinner =3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leekspinner93 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Lady Gaga
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lady Gaga. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 18:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Banned Article
Hi Dekisugi

I thank you for your intention in my article under the "British Forces Germany" article on Wikipedia where I advertised. I appreciate now that my actions in placing so many links may have been overboard.

I would ask that you consider the following 2 proposals.

1. I would like a feature/page to be dedicated to Forces Resources Limited. It is the UK's only company setup to deliver members of the armed forces serving overseas and is a service that is essential to people serving abroad. If companies like DHL have their own feature when they provide services that are not unique then surely Forces Resources Limited with a totally unique service could have one.

2. As well as the above I think that a link should be added to the BFPO article. As mentioned above this is the only service that allows people serving overseas to get items too large for the BFPO system (beds, furniture etc) to be delivered to them without paying hundreds of pounds.

I would ask that you consider the allowing of the dedicated article AND the link in the "BFPO" article. If not then would you please allow the link in the "BFPO" website.

I appreciate that this could be classed as advertising but it really is a service that people based overseas need to know about. I wish I had this service when I was based overseas and now this is an essential service.

I thank you for your time and consideration.

If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact me john.evans@forcesresources.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forcesresources (talk • contribs) 09:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
Hi Dekisugi,

Can you look at the following articles; I think these articles should be nominated for deletion (or merged?) Since there are no sources cited, notwithstanding the fact that when you go to google and type each of these articles and hit “news”, it would give you nothing. These articles despite all attempts to find third party reliable sources to verify them have failed. If you cling with the same findings as mine (deletion of these articles under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion), please do nominate the following articles for deletion:
 * Manhunt International 1993 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 1994 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 2000 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 2002 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 2005 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 2007 Google news here
 * Manhunt International 2008 Google news here
 * List of Manhunt International countries Google news here
 * Manhunt International special awards Google news here
 * Mister World Google news here
 * Miss Globe International 2007 Google news here

I think the following articles should be merged:
 * Miss Tourism Queen International 2008 to Miss Tourism Queen International Google news here
 * Miss Globe International 2007 to Miss Globe International Google news here
 * All the Manhunt International articles above to Manhunt International Google news here

Thank you.--Ped Admi (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Alf Wight/James Herriot
you recently removed a swap i made with the pages entitled "james herriot" and "alf wight". i swapped the pages as alf wight was in fact his real name and what the article should be titled! please restore this edit! Inkworldluver (talk) 09:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Jeuce Page
Dekisugi,

I am currently responsible for the Jeuce band page on Wikipedia. I have noticed your application for deletion and must protest this allegation. Jeuce are an up and coming band, the evidence is plain to see. Their music is known and played all over England and you are able to purchase their music over the internet via providers such as iTunes, Napster, eMusic, etc. Jeuce also have an official Hadouken! remix, licensed by Atlantic Records (please see Hadouken! Declaration Of War (single)).

I have also noticed that there are a great deal of Wikipedia pages with much less content and importance than this page. I hope this matter can be resolved and if you feel you can advise on any extra content to be included on the band's Wikipedia page the information will be greatly welcomed.

Kind Regards,

Josh Get Sound Sexy Records. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Getsoundsexy (talk • contribs) 11:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Please advise
I'm not trying to promote myself but my website, which is a new entity and requires a definition. The site is so full of definitions and not in lay man's terms. Please advise how can I change my article to reflect a proper definition of my site, within Wiki guidelines. I created it so I need to be briefly defined. But please don't act to delete something before you know anything about it. Isn't the purpose of this site to educate and open people up to new things? I wouldn't post here if I didn't believe real users could benefit from visiting the site. Peace, AT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Toochin (talk • contribs) 16:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

If you feel the authority to police, then be professional enough to refer to your superior so I may discuss the issue with him/her.Andrea Toochin (talk) 18:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi
That was not vandalism. I addressed the issue on the talk page first, but there was no reply. There are plenty of very reliable sources confirming that Obama won the 2 debates. Wolfno7 (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Roger Hutchinson
You should have done your homework on this guy before you put the prod tag on him. A very notable writer, although it is naughty of him to write his own page...--MacRusgail (talk) 10:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Josef Klose
Klose was not a member of first (A) Poland national football team - Pl.wiki and kadra.pl Divino (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Blake Criswell Lucas
Look me up. I'm on facebook.
 * I don't care. Dekisugi (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Relax Inn Lake of the Ozarks
Why was my listing removed when others remain. There is Tan-Tar-A. Big Surf Water park and many others. I think you unfairly removed my listing.

-CP

--Jaizadib (talk) 07:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)== Advocate Anish Wadia's page ==

Hi Dekisugi,

I am Advocate Anish Wadia. I am a registered lawyer with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa. I am entitled to practice in the Bombay High Court and Supreme Court of India.

I do not wish my identity to be disclosed, so that I can avoid unnecessary harassment from law students. Therefore, I work under the Pen Name of "Jaizadib".

You have just tagged my page for "speedy deletion". I would request you to kindly remove such tag or, in the alternate, please inform me if I have accidentally (since I am new to wikipedia) not adhered to any of the stipulated norms/practices.

I look forward to a favourable and expedient reply.

Thank You

Faithfully,

Anish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaizadib (talk • contribs) 07:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hogan's Heroes external link addition reverted?
Howdy,

I added a useful link to the Hogan's Heroes article, but you reverted my changes. I'm curious as to why? What do you oppose?

Saturn1bguy (talk) 07:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Pier Gerlofs Donia
Please review and pass the following article for GA class. It is well referenced article of brilliant prose and both the Rambling man and user talk:Jimbo Wales agree it should be a Good Article. Last king of Frisia (talk) 10:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

read asap plz
=help= hey how did u know i did it that fast and yes i will use the sandbox thing also how can i be one of u by that i mean the people that watch, warn, and report thanks plz reply also i did not know where to type this so i put it here

ADOPT ME
will you adopt me and what does it do :S lol thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaara911 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm Gary Neville's Dad, I'm changing it to what it is on his birth certificate, why aren't I allowed to change my own son's name?! The Big N —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garyppnneville (talk • contribs) 14:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi dekisugi. I made the page "Carl Lamson" for a friend as a quick joke but now he doesn't want it on there. Is there any way that you can actually delete the entire page instead of just the info? Thanks in advance for your reply.

-AK —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akninja04 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

A Request
Hey could you please delete the page i created entirely? It was a quick joke for a friend but now he doesn't want it on here so could you delete the whole thing? thank you. It was entitled "Carl Lamson"

-AK