User talk:Dekisugi/Junkyard

Hello!
Hello! Where is the walking fern talk page? Thank you! - L. Adair —Preceding unsigned comment added by L. Adair (talk • contribs) 10:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

please.
Im only teasing my friend! I know a lot about pokemon, so i can add good stuff on them! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragon Misstress 3 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! That user didn't have any patience and willing of understanding, that article is in construction for God sake! there are many other, more than 100.--Sambure (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

you mug
you mug ha you fucking little mug that was constructive not vandalism you prick ta ta —Preceding unsigned comment added by You mug (talk • contribs) 09:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

not happy
Dear Dekisugi,

Recently an article i edited was changed by yourself. I had spent tireless hours consumed by research to advertise to people this new game. It is certaintly not fair that you can just come along and spoil the research i have contributed to wikipedia. wikipedia is all about editing pages to give people more changes yet none can be made due to your interference.

Perhaps i can write a letter to your manager telling them of what you have done? no more badges for Dikisugi. Oh yeah and your statistics are not very impressive. Just showed me that 19 people don't like you. And also you seem to be desperate enough to report someone who had innocently added to one of your articles.

signed numanumayei2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Numanumayei2 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh Yeah!
If you are going to ban me than why don't you do it you big irish f*****!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahara24 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME!!
Ecuse me,

I am an advertiser and consultant for BAT Community Connector in the City of Bangor. I do not appreciate you taking off the bus assignments. They were correct when created. Tell me do you have any qualification to edit a page about buses! Please do not edit that page again or I will call it vandalism. have a great day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conductor476 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I apologize.
I must apologize. I hadn't realized you had sent me a message to clarify what I had done wrong. This was my first time using wikipedia and I was not sure on what I had done wrong. I am a reliable source and will site the information I add from now on.

Sorry again. :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conductor476 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Why do you have to keep ruining my fun?
Why do you have to keep ruining my fun? God, you are so '''ANNOYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by MortalEnticement (talk • contribs) 21:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Mellow out, man!
Brad Hat (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam?
I'm sorry is not my intention "vandalize" your page, but why you have canceled my map ??? Is more affidable than Peter Frost Maps ( who are completely wrong ) is a study of blondism in Italy by Renato Biasutti one of the most important italian anthropologist. You really believe that the Spaniards and Greeks are more blond than Northern Italians ??? If you visit Europe you can know the difference between Italy (who borders with Austria,Switzerland and France) and Spain and Greece.

if you have read, you can delete this (i'm sorry for my english)

GaiusCrastinus — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaiusCrastinus (talk • contribs)

You
Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo you wanker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stabbyboyo (talk • contribs) 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

youu are teh n00b
you stalk me noob —Preceding unsigned comment added by BENWELL STEEV (talk • contribs) 13:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Satisfaction
I demand satisfaction from you, good sir.

You have willfully destroyed the lyrics eternally dedicated to STEEVY C.

Once again, I demand satisfaction.
 * you had better give him satisfaction he will glove you
 * also, you are a knave-noob hybrid
 * not only that, but you are a duck/rattenkrieg
 * I ALSO DEMAND SATISFACTION, GOOD SIR

Satisfaction
Good Sir, You have offended my beliefs, and those of my good friend by deleting the lyrics of the song Steve Steve Travelling Steve.

Therefore, I Demand Satisfaction from you!

OI
GOT A PROBLEM IAM SPREADING THE WORD OF XENU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BOBLO1356 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you PLEASE stop deleting Blessed Ethel?
If you give me five sodding minutes I'll tell you why they were important! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newmatt3 (talk • contribs) 10:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Backing out RSS changes
Please could you explain why you don't like my RSS link ? Thanks

Derek Roberts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdr6 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Umm, get out of my profile, k?
thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devendorane (talk • contribs) 12:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

The point has been scrapped
Invariably —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devendorane (talk • contribs) 12:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Satisfaction
I demand satisfaction, good sir, for you have removed Steve Steve Travelling Steve, a song made by the great Lord Hopkins of The Township of Meadowell —Preceding unsigned comment added by BENWELL STEEV (talk • contribs) 12:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * STOP REMOVING THE SONG ABOUT ME IT WAS PUT THERE BY MY GOOD FRIENDS Random403 (talk) 12:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Motivation for link
I would like to add some easy red information about international humanitarian law to the wikipedia page on the topic. Please have a look at the page www.diakonia.se/ihl and you will find easily explained rules of IHL. I do not see why the IHL Research Initiative link would be more relevant than the link to Diakonia's Easy Guide. The added value with the link I would like to add is that it leads to a page that targets not only lawyers (as the research initiative), but people in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksouressaf (talk • contribs) 10:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

visitbritain
Why did you delete the update to the visitbritain information I added? VisitBritain did win an award at the world travel awards in 2007. The information from the 2005 award is up there currently, I don't understand what is wrong with updating this, with the latest information.

Also surely adding the fact that VisitBritain now has user-content material on it's websites is good background information about how the company is progressing and what it does. I wasn't trying to advertise, simply to update the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LauraHolborow (talk • contribs) 10:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

you deleted my english essay
i hate you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Username209 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Update Blocked - reverted to original information
The information that was previously found under the 'Christian de Portzamparc' search was not created by Christian de Portzamparc and has hence been updated/modified by the Atelier Christian de Portzamparc, and is certified to be correct and current information - updated 2008-01-14 - please allow these changes to be saved

Hello there, I think it's really fantastic that you help to ensure that Wikipedia isn't abused - it's a great resource and I use it all the time to get info. I think you're doing a really important job - if lots of spamming and advertising was allowed then it would really devalue Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've posted a few messages on my user page asking me not to spam. I'm a confused because the links are not identical, they are specific to town guides on the site French Property Links, which I find has very valuable information on many French towns. I think the information I have added to the articles is useful and enhances Wikipedia - I'm certainly not trying to spam. Best wishes, User:Francomaniac 10:38, 15 January 2008

Christian de Portzamparc
Hello, thank you for your response regarding the update of information for Christian de Portzamparc. I would just like to clarify that the statistics added to the Wikipedia website were not intended as advertising material, but merely the diffusion of information about the current and past works of the agnecy. In collating the documents, we referred to the wikipedia pages of other architectural firms which all seem to have sections on current and build projects (see Jean Nouvel, Richard Rogers etc. I hope, in the interest of objectivity of wikipedia, that we will be able to provide the same data. Also, you mentioned that there was a conflict of interest in my user name being Portzamparc - is it advisable to have a username unrelated to the subject? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Portzamparc (talk • contribs) 16:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

cellopodcast
the web site cellopodcast.it, is only for educational use. all Advertising on this site is for support a no-profit association "amici della musica", you can find it on www.musicislife.eu, that take no more of 100 dollars in a year!! I'm cellist and teacher on italian conservatory and i am a "International society for music education" member.

many links on this page "cello" on wiki have more economic interests, like youtube, that it is a realy commecial web site. what do yuo think?

best regards, and please, forgive my english :) Antonio —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anto1964 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

What did I do?
A friend of mine had this problem too, I'm trying to make Wikipedia a better place, and what happens? I get punished. Fine, no more ACCURATE information for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeeDaBee (talk • contribs) 17:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

hey can you help me write my page about Marc Columbo i dont really know how to do it. MItchelbonney123456789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchelbonney123456789 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Surely Mitchelbonney123456789 is a sockpuppet of Mitchelbonney987654321/Andrewbowden987654321. He even openly admits on his user page that he enjoys vandalising wikipedia. On another note, were on wikipedia do you go to report serial vandals? Thanks TheProf07 (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Bevolex
Thanks for speedy tagging it, but I think it has just about enough to make speedying inappropriate. AFD however, is a different matter altogether and I'm not sure whether I'd currently opt to keep it if it were nominated. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) 14:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedily deleted page
You have deleted a page that I had just started creating after I had performed a first save to my text before adding all appropriate links to other pages within wikipedia. You then seem to have gone to the page created by someone else that I had originally linked from and deleted a large section from their page as well. Is such hasty action necessary? I didn't even have time to respond and delay the deletion of my new page before everything was gone. In my opinion the finished page would have been a valid addition to wikipedia: it was not advertising any companies; I would have added scientific citations; and it could have been linked in to many other pages int his area of research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EADGENE (talk • contribs) 11:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suicide Squad
Sorry for any misunderstanding, but the consensus seems to be that the section in question is a hoax if you look at the history of Suicide Squad, thanks.Nikhilsohail (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re. Hayton
Please dont edit something that you dont know about!

Thanks,

Bill —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipidia is great (talk • contribs) 14:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Lords Of Zeroah.
How would i get that page able to be used on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReapeRs PreY (talk • contribs) 15:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

article
Dekisugi,

Which parts of the article am I unable to place on there?

please let me know

Many thanks

Holly —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollyt2008 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Am I allowed to place thompson-morgan.com in the article as it is a direct reference to what the article is saying about it being newly developed and where people can get more information??

--Hollyt2008 (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dekisugi,

i am updating the page but would you check it once done to see it complies as i dont want to get banned etc.

many thanks

--Hollyt2008 (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dekisugi,

i have finished making the amendments would you check the page for me and tell me what content is not allowed to be on there so the sign at the top no longer appears??

Many Thanks

--Hollyt2008 (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Scott Warner
I've removed the speedy deletion tag from the above article. While the subject might not be notable, the article does assert notability in a reasonable way. You may wish to list it at WP:AFD instead, to get a broader consensus on the article. Thanks for your time and your hard work reporting these articles - even though I'm not deleting this particular one, your efforts are very much appreciated. Kafziel Take a number 18:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Ping Pong (disambiguation)
There is an original, game of paddless Ping Pong located at http://www.alligator77002.com/alligators-amusements/ping_pong.html that belongs in Ping Pong disambiguation as this is a true Ping Pong amusement and does not belong in the "Table Tennis" category and there is no other place to list it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alligator77002 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I know it's probably one of the custom templates and all that, but I think this may be in breach of the spirit of biting the newbies to come down so hard on a first time editor. Wikipedia is still the encyclopedia anyone can edit, and for me there are friendlier ways this could have been handled. Maybe consider the advice at WP:RELAX regarding warnings and try and roll your own for a more personal approach. It's just a thought. Have a god one regardless. Hiding T 16:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. I know what you mean about featured articles, and it is at times hard to know what to add as much as what to leave out.  It wasn't so much the removal as the somewhat stuffy warning.  Anyway, no probs and happy editing. Hiding T 17:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, responding to your comment
This is a response to your comment on the added contents I suggested a the Hydropower. I thought that there were relatively extensive discriptions on the subject, including the mathematics (or physics if you call it). But, as you know, computer programs to help solve some of the physical problems are relevant in this information age. Thus, adding a software example under that subject would be a positive rather than a negative. Believe me, that SIMAHPP is a software that is very compatible with the context of the hydropower subject. I have been using this tool since last year. I do not mind if you know other software and include some list there as we can see more examples of that kind in Wikipedia. I thought I would drop some information that's relevant to enhance pages here ....

Wuhawater (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Noah's Classifieds Deletion
You've just deleted Noah's Classifieds, so speedily that no one could object

Apparently it has been deleted because: "This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article."

Noah's Classifieds happens to be free software and the only people who benefits from it are the users. By deleting that information you are effectively pushing them towards a commercial solution from a private company, product, group, service or person.

The article only had an InfoBox, a Description, list of Features, History and links to official sites. Could you explain what needed to be "fundamentally rewritten" so speedily? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1001webs (talk • contribs) 15:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
You suggested Ancient Canaan be redirected to Canaan. Instead, ASEOR2 redirected ancient israel to ancient canaan: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_Israel&action=history - did he have any authority to do so? Slrubenstein  |  Talk 23:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

I challenge you to an edit war!
Not really, just giving you a heads up that your revert on the Stand-up Comedy page was itself undone (by a semirandom person). If you just got tricked into some comedy feud between Ben Pobjie and Aaron Meszaros, I don't know, but if it goes on, I would propose that we just list the guy from Ronny Johns who does the Chopper impression and be done with it.Pink-thunderbolt (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Ponniah
I just wanted you to see the new article with an entry at WP:AFD, and wondered if you think notability is now established? (Mind meal (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC))


 * Thanks for your comment. The references are not self-referential in that they are there to demonstrate he has written for Znet and been interviewed by openDemocracy. Being published in academic journals, mind you, is no small feat. According to PROF, he passes several given examples.

1. An academic who has published a book or books of general interest, a widely used textbook, or non-academic articles in periodicals with significant readership is likely to be notable as an author (see WP:BIO), regardless of their academic achievements. Similarly, an academic involved in significant current events is likely to be notable as a person under the general WP:BIO guidelines. NOTE: The italicized portion is clear in this article.

2. An academic repeatedly quoted in newspapers or newsmagazines may be considered to meet criterion 1. A small number of quotations, especially in local newsmedia, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark. (For this, he is quoted in multiple books).

Also, I believe him to be a "significant expert in his or her area by independent sources" given the amount of references to his material. That does it. I respect your opinion, but certainly do not agree with it. I'm not easy on notability, but he does pass. (Mind meal (talk) 10:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC))

Reporting to Officials
What does this mean? I'm sorry for what I've done. I was bored, and I will quit. Please forgive me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob barker rox my sox (talk • contribs) 03:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy of Raghu Vira
Actually it looks like a copyright violation, rather than nonsense. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Edited
It is being edited but deletion is not needing to be speedy :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by E.Nelson1 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Reasons not to delete my page
From: YLEF Let's talk like civilized people, There are no reasons why editing a page for LEGAL PURPOSES is considered vandalism. You are probably thinking that the YLEF is not a real LEGO Club. But we are. The YLEF is the best LEGO Club in the whole city of Doral, FL, as in opinions and poll questions of people. I will tell you more later. YLEF, 10:45 PM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YLEF (talk • contribs) 03:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

castletown geoghegan
how is it maliciously? he is my fuckin father.

User:Steph mcdonnell
Please do what you can do block this cretin. --House of Scandal (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

cretin eh? we'll c. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steph mcdonnell (talk • contribs) 21:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

OI
cant i spread the word of xenu

Deep Diving
I wrote and corrected some information on this and I was wondering why it was taken down or what was wrong with it. Thanks J Small —Preceding unsigned comment added by DelanaSmall (talk • contribs) 15:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I own you
Hey, the story of Jason Barlowe must be known, so check it, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jason_Barlowe nuthin you can do now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2009kams (talk • contribs) 16:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletions?
Can you tell me why my entries on the Donor Sibling Registration page were deleted? DCHealth (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Mos def
Hi, i got a message from you about the mos def conspiracy category, according to the category page, people who espouse views listed in Conpiracy Theories are to be place in this category. Mos def has claimed the moon landings are a hoax, so he clearly belongs.

Mos def
Hi, i got a message from you about the mos def conspiracy category, according to the category page, people who espouse views listed in Conpiracy Theories are to be place in this category. Mos def has claimed the moon landings are a hoax, so he clearly belongs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hahahahahaoh (talk • contribs) 10:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Po'Sme'll
You recently deleted my page poosmell. I misspelled it, and I don't think you should have taken it off because it is a serious mythological creature. Please tell me why you thought it was vandalism! --Joe Tracfone (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Why are you deletin Grammar with Cindy
Grammar with Cindy is a great way to educate the nations.

Everyone has internet, and everyone looks at wikipedia. I dont see how people say that it is an uninformational. I am just starting the article. Greatness takes time. How does it not give information. It is all about grammar I am educating the world. Please tell me how to fix my article so that Grammar with Cindy can live on. It is a really good idea. You will see that if you would just give it a chance. Please dont let this article go in the dumps. This article is trying to help everyone. Not do any harm. Please I hope you can feel the emotion going into this letter because Grammar with Cindy is really important to me. This is just one more way that we can gain knowledge and knowledge is power. Please dont let Grammar with Cindy go down the tubes. Please just think about it. What is wrong with it. All it is is simple grammar lessons that will grow more complex in the following time. But if it is deleted there will be no following time

Thank You for taking time to read this.

I hope you see the true importance for Grammar with Cindy.

Grammar Cindy (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Cindy

the mug machine
It was not a reason to remove everything! you should have told me and remove only the picture of the mug machine. It took time to write the article and it was very interesting. That is what I call vandalism simon

the mug machine
It was not a reason to remove everything! you should have told me and remove only the picture of the mug machine. It took time to write the article and it was very interesting. That is what I call vandalism --Simon Lirzin (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)simon

I removed every link and everything about mug machine. I just explained how to print on mug from your home. How could this be advertisement? --Simon Lirzin (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

So how can I do to write an article about printing on mugs from your home without you thinking it is an ad? --Simon Lirzin (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

While I recognize your importance on a site like this, I think it may have gone to your head.
I noticed you reverted my changes, saying they were "like ads, US-Centric, and UnEncyclopedic." Not that I think a person like you would care, I think you have not thought through your comment very well. The whole world has mailboxes, and I noticed that the page currently only spoke of European regulations, so I added some US regulations. Should I have added regulations for all the other countries as well? Maybe, but I am an American, I only know US regulations. UnEncyclopedic? WOW. You've probably read every public page of Wikipedia, so I'm sure you've seen it all, for those of us who haven't, but want to make a valuable contribution to this community, there's bound to be a learning curve. We can't all match your apparently high standards for the quality of the material that should be allowed to be posted. Some of us are just regular folks who may have worthwhile things to say and be heard. And lastly, "Like Ads"? I can only assume this is because I cited a reference to another informational site where I found some of my information because there were no other citations and because of the link to the oldest online store and manufacturer of mailboxes we could find. You may have noticed that was in the history section. I thoroughly disagree that this was "Ad-Like" or in any way was intended as a promotion of those businesses, however I did edit the content somewhat as a result of your comment, and would appreciate any recommendations you have. I've looked all over for more than an hour and can't find any other references to mailbox manufacturing or sales that indicate who were the first individuals or companies to begin mass producing mailboxes or selling them to the general public. If you know of any, I'd love hear about them.

Normally I try to be very cordial the first opportunity I have to communicate with someone new, but I've read your talk page and you come accross more like an egotistical, pompous, self-proclaimed protector of Wikipedia who is judge, jury, and executioner without the slighest regard for any human element. I feel that if you had taken my additions in context and given some thought to the whole content of the page like I had, I'll bet you would have at the very least not called it "US-Centric".

On a more positive note, having over a million pages of websites myself, most of which allow for user feedback of various kinds, I can certainly appreciate having someone with a very strict interpretation of what is and is not allowed. If I had an employee like you I'd make you a two man team with someone who is more able to relate to people and think about how us humans really work. You're on one end of a very big spectrum. While I appreciate your work, I'd like you to think some about the quality of it before you continue. We certainly need people like you, but maybe without the (perceived) apparent disregard for others. You can do better, just give it some thought before you go slashing at what people have worked hard at contributing.

I should also state, that I will be working more on the page. I do NOT want to get into an edit war with you, and would LOVE to hear any suggestions about how we could improve the page or where I could find more information for the page. You may have gathered, I work in mailboxes, I'll work very hard to make sure that I add valuable content that conforms to Wiki's guidelines, and have zero interest in being the kind of person you have anything against. I'm new to Wikipedia, and would love to have some help from someone as obviously experienced as you are. I will even go so far as to say I may have misjudged you, and if that turns out to be the case I'll gladly apologize.

Thanks, Mike (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

wild swimming
Dekisugi - the links to wild swimming, the term used in the Uk for swimming in nature, are clearly relevant to the skinny dipping and swimming hole pages, and only add value and context to the article. Why have you deleted them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel.start (talk • contribs) 21:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

So what's the deal then?
Ok, so if you wrote the article then are you trying to keep anyone else from changing it? Are you convinced it's perfect as is? I think there's a lot of great information that could be added to it. I can understand if you feel like it's your baby. Not that big a deal. Believe me I've got better things to do than make changes only to have you revert them. The world is big enough for both of us... maybe just barely, I'm a big guy.

Now the comment on Wiki not being a manual, I understand, (and appreciated, it made some of your talk page comments make more sense) but even in there, it says you can talk about a website if you "describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance". Particularly online, putting in the history section that the oldest site we could find that sold mailboxes online was that site? Or that the oldest manufacturer of mailboxes we could find was that manufacturer? I realize it's not grandiose, but I think at least historically significant.

I love that you left the reference to the USPS mailbox regulations, but took out the text above it concerning them even though you've got text above that talks about European regulations. Are you British? A lot of brits think of the US as it's red-headed step child, so that would make your "US Centric" comment make sense since a few US facts, in my opinion, would make the article more well rounded, nationally speaking.

--Mike (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

referencing new books on skinny dipping and swimming hole
Hi Dekisugi,

I notice you've arbitrarily deleted reference to my book, while leaving reference to various other external links and books, many of which are commercial enterprises. e.g.

"Day Trips with a Splash: Hiking guides to swimming holes in California, Southwest, New England, Adirondacks and Appalachians. Hundreds of trips with photos, maps and GPS."

What is the difference between this link (put up by the author too) and the link to my book?

Many of the links on 'skinny dipping' and 'swimming holes' are to commercial products (books and films) and could be called 'advertising' or 'spam'. How do you chose one book over another to delete? Is it whether the author puts them up or someone else? Is it by how long they have been published? If so then this should be part of the official content policy, no, rather than your personal opinion?

I have added the link correctly, using a reference, and have also contributed intelligently to both articles, adding additional material and improving their structure. Why have you taken a personal dislike to me and my contributions?

By what consensual and democratic process would you suggest we resolve this disagreement?

Regards

Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel.start (talk • contribs) 10:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

ISBN978-1434312877
Hi Dekisugi,perhaps I should use the booksource link with an ISBN no. instead of external links to the website. Please tell me if that is Ok and how to do it? Thank you, Dentistben —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dentistben (talk • contribs) 09:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Not a Nice Guy
Can you please stop deleting perfectly ok images that I spend my time creating. So selfish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FashionMan (talk • contribs) 10:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk:"lakas socialism"
I take the view that a db-author request overrides any AfD discussion. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

MMR Hoax Deletion
Dear Dekisgugi

Re: the MMR Hoax redirect, I was mid-way through writing a justifaction on the discussion page. Ben Goldachre, a popular writer in the British newpaper The Guardian, refers to the MMR Controvery as the "MMR Hoax" (for example ). I thought it was worth having a redirect for people look it up on wikipedia after seeing it in newpaper articles.

Sorry for the misunderstanding, Luke —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowk (talk • contribs) 14:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Magic Bullet Productions
Your message is in error; I didn't create the Magic Bullet Producitons page, Snide_Paul did, back in 2006. I removed the speedy deletion citation because the page has been up since 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dayofthetriffids (talk • contribs) 17:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

CSDtag
Because the article's been up since 2006 and the tag's just been added; I surfed over after creating the Alan Stevens page and discovered that someone had tagged it for speedy deletion and thought "that's got to be a mistake."

CSDtag
Because the article's been up since 2006 and the tag's just been added; I surfed over after creating the Alan Stevens page and discovered that someone had tagged it for speedy deletion and thought "that's got to be a mistake." If I screwed up, I'm sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dayofthetriffids (talk • contribs) 17:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

CFD
Yeah, that was why I thought it had to be a mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dayofthetriffids (talk • contribs) 17:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports (please)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports (please), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know about Wiki
Thanks for letting me know I was trying to add interesting facts to articles. How do I go about citing these facts. I found article article that says a ducks quack does not ecco. Isn't this info appropriate for a wiki article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by It is me i think (talk • contribs) 17:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
Anytime :-) TheProf | Talk 17:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Words: types of definition
I removed the speedy tage because the definition of patent nonsense is as follows:
 * 1) Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "rtmhtyhjjflbhjoglhjgblvjh\[\\\\98kjt9ykbitiof,kkc", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed.
 * 2) Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

The article an essay, and most certainly meaningful and sensible. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Stalker
You seem to have some fetish about me, cos everywhere I go, you are there too! I'll say this easily so you can understand Leave me the fuck alone. Ok? Otrin (talk) 11:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I know its "OK", you have no choice in the matter. Otrin (talk) 11:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Enjoy posing as an admin do you? Otrin (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I tried my best to reason with him! But, there are plenty of good editors on wikipedia. Theres no point turning a blind eye to a sometimes good/sometimes bad user. I had to report him in the end. Anyway... Onto the next vandal, because the war on vandalism is on going. Thanks and have a nice day! :-) TheProf - T / C 12:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you think that way about me! Otrin (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You just don't get it do you?
How hard does it have to be, you leave me alone. You are being reported for harrassment.Otrin (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The way i see it Otrin, you are the one harassing us. TheProf - T / C 13:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm being calm. Don't worry. Dekisugi (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Me too. :-) TheProf - T / C 13:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

why was it deleted?
Hey Dekisugi, Why did you delete my page on Emagdnim? It's my first posting and I obviously don't quite understand Wiki etiquette as well as you do. It was all legitimate information, provided by Emagdnim himself.

Thanks, Vanityfair15 (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Vanity

Kim Jong
YOU CAN NEVER REVERT THE HUMANITARIANISM OF OUR CHAMPION KNIGHT, KIM JONG IL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonnaaaaaaaaassooosos (talk • contribs) 11:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Link deleted
Hello,

I don't understand why you deleted my link ? I find this site completely appropriated and absolutely not against the Wikipedia Policy ... Can you explain me the reason of this "cleaning up" ?

thank you in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thousandandone (talk • contribs) 10:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Northants ET
I have recently added a statement about Shaun Murphy which was from a legitimate source but it has still been deleted.

Link: http://www.northantset.co.uk/news/Snooker-star-Murphy-splits-from.4608499.jp

This is not a gossip website as far as I'm aware this is my local paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickety (talk • contribs) 10:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry!
Sorry, I didn't actually mean to delete the other references I'm new to the site so I didn't actually know what I was doing. Please forgive me, i don't mean to be annoying :) Thankyou, Vicky.

Free PDF ebook "THE COLD HEART by WILHELM HAUFF" deleted twice for what reason!?
Hello Dekisugi,

I don't understand why you deleted my link? I find my site completely appropriated and absolutely not against the Wikipedia Policy ... Can you explain me the reason of this "cleaning up" ?

I believe you will find it useful after all ...

Sanmayce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanmayce (talk • contribs) 11:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page Skooch for speedy deletion with the reason "an article about a group or club that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because sadly, this is an article about a sport, not a club. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, or using the WP:AFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 11:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I put another useful info about 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' and guess what - you again.

You did ruin my day with your stupidity girl! "I watch, I warn and I report." - do you know what are you doing in Wikipedia?

Sanmayce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanmayce (talk • contribs) 11:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

hi
tried to undo the spam on the drammatica page, wouldn't let me. go get a ban capable person, let em talk to the vandal--Jakezing (talk) 12:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

3 2 1
I have removed the prod tag from 3 2 1, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!
 * The article had already been tagged once, and the tag removed. According to Wikipedia policy, that counts as a "controversial" delete, and must be handled via the AfD process.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

3 2 1
I have removed the prod tag from 3 2 1, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!
 * The article had already been tagged once, and the tag removed. According to Wikipedia policy, that counts as a "controversial" delete, and must be handled via the AfD process.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Stick It
This is my first account, not sure why you called me a sock puppet. You are such a tool of the system —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joebuckman (talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Question
What is wrong with introducing the well known fact that Jim Caple eats his boogs. ALso, you cant block me because I am sneaky--sneakier than sneak itself. SNEAK! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youcantcensorme (talk • contribs) 14:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Reverts
Please don't Revert anything That Latias1002 puts this is my sister and i don't mind her editing anything that isn't vandalizm. Please be careful what you revert. I do and will report people for unreasonable Reverts Thanks --Elite Rhodes (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Just ignore this Please i sent it to the wrong person sorry--Elite Rhodes (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

何で俺の作ったページ削除しましたか？何の問題ですか？ —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGurge (talk • contribs) 06:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

hey douchebag, I am well informed when it comes to knowing that both gary bettman and richard peddie are douchebags. Get your head out of the sand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lardrewstar (talk • contribs) 07:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

お前
お前は日本人ですか？何故俺の修正した所を監視している？文句あればちゃんと言いなさい. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ButsuriDaisukii (talk • contribs) 07:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

User:ButsuriDaisukii
I noticed you tagged him as a sockpuppet of. Is there any relationship between TheGurge and ? ButsuriDaisukii admitted that they are a sockpuppet of Mattopia. See User talk:CambridgeBayWeather. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks, they are blocked anyway. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Request Rollback
Oh OK, somehow I got your warning late..

Anyway I was trying to update the information that was already present. there was a list of 3 books, but the publishers profile is different.

Sandeep --Sandeepchauhan72 (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi there! I've been going through the New Pages log, particularly the back end of it. I've come across an article (Web design studio) that you've added a tag to that hasn't been patrolled. I was wondering if you could make sure that you mark an article as patrolled before you tag it as then it won't show up on the list, which will save people patrolling an article that has already been looked at by an experienced editor like yourself.

Please accept my apologies if you are doing this and the software is lagging behind, or if you're just tagging articles that you're coming across from a different source that doesn't allow you to patrol them. Thanks in advance! --Ged UK (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi there, not a problem! Basically users like you and me check new pages, and if we think there's problem, we tag them. Then an admin looks over the tagged pages and makes a decision. The trick with new page patrolling is not to tag things as fast as possible, but to give the article a bit of breathing space. And by making sure that you 'mark article as patrolled' before you add any tags means that someone else doesn't have to look at the article unneccesarily. Keep up the good work though! --Ged UK (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

?
I do not understand why you have deleted my contributions to the Yasuda Kei and Melon Kinenbi pages, and marked them as vandalism. I may be new to contributing, but the information I provided on the graduations from Hello!Project are correct. Marippe (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Marippe

Paraguayan Military
Are you an expert on the Military in Paraguay? I bet you don't realize that premature greyness is considered a sign of great wisdom and leadership in their culture. This is why young men with this condition are obligated to serve 20+ years in the Military, often becoming high ranking generals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianburban (talk • contribs) 14:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Why the deletion?
Your intervention suggests you regard the information below as not being factual. So please could you advise which aspects of the following sentences you find controversial, "editorial" or "a matter of opinion"?


 * James Allen was Britain's first TV commentator of F1 in the Internet era.
 * The emergence of Lewis Hamilton brought tens of thousands of "new" fans to F1 in Britain.
 * The Internet era was marked by a rise in participatory interventions and online campaigns.
 * There was an internet campaign on Facebook against Allen.
 * The campaign was largely based on the fact that Allen was seen as biased against Hamilton.

If you want to add the word "Cock" at all costs, as well as the links to all those old Facebook groups, by all means do so, but I don't think your attempts to remove this context is defensible. FacchettiBurnich Facchettiburnich (talk) 14:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Truth not the issue?
I see you are determined, for whatever reason, to keep control of this bio. I was just trying to add some background so the more hurtful references - no hiding, James is an old friend from when I designed Autosport & F1 Racing a lifetime ago -- could be seen in context. Never mind. Cheers FacchettiBurnich Facchettiburnich (talk) 15:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Guujaaw and User:Guujaaw's contributions
While, yes, many of User:Guujaaw's editions were uncited, and he did delete material already in the article and otherwise unlink and unstyle it, it was a good faith edit and not vandalism; a little diplomacy please - this user is very likely in WP:COI territory and is probably Guujaaw himself; but he's the President of the Council of the Haida Nation and it's impolitick to delete his attempts at improving the article; better to have tidied it up, replaced what he unknowingly deleted in violation of "add, don't delete", and add fact tags where needed. It won't help Wikipedia if the Haida people are "offed" by Wikipedia's coverage of them or if they're insulted by harsh applications of Wikipedia guidelines....some tact, please....Skookum1 (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I want all my co
Hey Dekisugi

I have asked you about deletions you made, but you ignored me, so I saw from a log that: - I am a spammer - Will be blacklisted - Will be penalized by ...

"Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines."

Was it so hard to you to explain in two words about reasons ..., anyway consider that I don't want to be part of Wikipedia anymore - so make your bans, penalties and blacklist.

P.S. You are against some free useful ebooks - something very wrong happens in your head!

Sanmayce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanmayce (talk • contribs) 16:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

deletion
Dear Sir/ Madam,

I have been mentioed in other Wikipedia articles already. If you type in my name, you can see. I do not understand why you are deleting/ have already deleted (?) me. Best Regards,

Tina Korhonen TinaKphotos (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Orion
Orion Group is the UK's largest Engineering Recruitment company. Other companies have information about them, why can't we?? Alan Savage is also the chairman and he was the chairman previously of ICTFC..

I'm new to posting information and might not have done this properly however being told I was posting incorrect info is not true!

I await your respoonse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oriongroup (talk • contribs) 19:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)