User talk:Delali Phrank

Speedy deletion nomination of Golden Strikers FC


A tag has been placed on Golden Strikers FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 16:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Golden Strikers FC


The article Golden Strikers FC has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A7 (not by me) was declined a few days ago. Have done a BEFORE check and found that sourcing is inadequate for any claim to notability. Ghana Football Leagues shows that Division 2 is actually the third tier of Ghanian football, with Ghana Premier League being the real top division (and the only one considered by WP:FPL to be fully professional), so any arguable claim to inherited notability simply from league participation is quite weak."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to James Kwesi Appiah have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GiantSnowman 10:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, the date on the page is wrong and leading to public misinformation. Kindly let me know why the changes has been undone. Delali Phrank (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at James Kwesi Appiah, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit contradicted 2 cited references. David Biddulph (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Can you please assist me with how my edit can be accepted and not blocked.

Can you please assist me with how I can edit and get it accepted. Delali Phrank (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)