User talk:Dele1234

October 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mandela Rhodes Scholarship. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. I see you've changed your username since your previous username was blocked; please note that the rule about not removing speedy deletion templates from articles you've created yourself applies to you, not your username.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  08:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

How about those who think it should be marked for deletion giving reasons that are specific to the article or remove the notice Dele1234 (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The reason I gave is one of the criteria for speedy deletion, and I also explained the reason on the article's talk page. The article is excessively promotional, to the extent that it requires a fundamental rewrite in order to be considered encyclopaedic. Please see our neutrality policy.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  08:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok. How about you do the "fundamental re-write" then except you don't think the subject is notable and explain why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dele1234 (talk • contribs)
 * If someone is willing to rewrite the article, they can do so now to prevent its speedy deletion, or rewrite it after it is speedily deleted.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  09:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Well, you seem to be the person who is dissatisfied with the article, that's why I ask you to do the re-write or to be more specific as to what exactly makes it "excessively promotional". I have compared it to the article on "Rhodes Scholarship" and both of them have the same tone in my opinion. Would you recommend that the article becomes a subsection of the "Rhodes Scholarship"? The Mandela Rhodes Scholarship is very impressive, it is difficult to outline its attributes without appearing to be promoting it.


 * You may also wish to read over WP:SPAMMER for some advice on how to contribute constructively rather than introducing spam into the project.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  08:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mandela Rhodes Scholarship, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  08:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Mandela Rhodes Scholarship. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  09:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks --Dele1234 (talk) 19:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)