User talk:Delightful void

Welcome!
Hello, Delightful void, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Allan Wexler, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk)  21:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Allan Wexler


A tag has been placed on Draft:Allan Wexler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.newschool.edu/parsons/faculty/allan-wexler/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  21:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Wexler


A tag has been placed on Allan Wexler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CUPIDICAE💕 00:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Allan Wexler, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Wexler


A tag has been placed on Allan Wexler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ahmetlii (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Allan Wexler articles
Hello! I like this artist's work. I am now sure where I have seen it before, but I think he should have a page on Wikipedia. Before I work any more on your draft, I wanted to ask what the story is on the Wexler articles and the many photos you seem to have uploaded? Are you working with his studio? The image of the chair piece in particular seems to have been taken from his site and been composited into a new image. Just curious about what is going on there. --- Possibly (talk) 04:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi @possibly. Thank you very much for your edits, very much appreciated! I am not working for his Studio or for him. I like his works, and I thought he should have a Wikipedia page. It was surprising to see that he does not have a Wikipedia article page. In a short, It is a voluntary initiative of mine. Yes I took those photos from his website but I made sure to give the credits for whomever necessary. I am new to Wikipedia, and I am not great at technical things. Let me know if you see any issue with copyright of photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delightful void (talk • contribs)
 * I replied on my talk page as I saw that message first.--- Possibly (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)