User talk:Delmuerte

Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hall Monitor 20:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Terrorizer LA
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~.

the band was not formed in 2015 You are correct, I was misled by The band's first performance was at the Grindcore JP Festival in Los Angeles on July 12th, 2015, which doesn't actually make sense looking at it again.

Delmuerte (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)The band was original formed in 1986, this new iteration of it was re-formed in 2014 for the show. The 2015 part is just a typo.

I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You need independent third-party sources.

Delmuerte (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)These were included in the original article:

http://bravewords.com/news/oscar-garcia-and-terrorizer-l-a-to-play-world-downfall-in-its-entirety-at-grindcore-2014-this-july-wehrmacht-nausea-and-more-also-confirmed http://www.laweekly.com/music/the-best-los-angeles-metal-shows-to-see-in-june-5621597 I could provide several links of confirmed shows, etc.


 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: was asked by the promoters of the event... began rigorously rehearsing... there was enough interest generated that the band decided to continue... are currently booked for a full European tour...

Delmuerte (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)The above links referenced in the original article. I don't understand how the fact of the band forming by the promoters of the event that the band formed to play sounds promotional (the promoter, being the original deceased guitarists' sister is integral to the fact of the band having been re-formed), or that the reason that band continues to exist is because it was asked to play more shows. I left that last part vague because I thought that referencing promoters booking the band would sound promotional and/or petty. The rest I'll give you, though that was not the intention. The intention was to let people know why there are two iterations of the band.


 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your bandn is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Delmuerte (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)I can't see how that matters, since it's not written to promote the band. It is solely to inform those who wish to know why there are now two iterations of the band with the facts. There's no links to the bands' external pages whatsoever.

I've seen worse than this, and if you like I'll sandbox it for you to improve and add references, just let me know Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Delmuerte (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)The fact is just that I am tired of being asked why there are two iterations of the band when it could be easily resolved with a wiki article that is both factual and informative. It doesn't benefit me one way or the other (save for the headache of constantly explaining or directing others to the other band) with no promotional material attached. So, I suppose whatever gets the article up for fine-tuning is fine.

Delmuerte (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC) so what now?

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxiplegatz
Hello Delmuerte,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oxiplegatz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Sjö (talk) 08:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)