User talk:Deloop82

April 2018
Hello there. Your talk page seems to indicate that you've received many warnings and a block in regards to unsourced/disruptive genre changing in films. Please know that the warnings/blocks would equally apply to video games as well. In general, please read WP:GENREWARRIOR - Wikipedia frowns upon people who just go around altering genre according to their personal opinions. Please stop doing this. I'd recommend you not get bogged down in genre-fiddling, but if you are, at least provide a source for your genre additions. And in general, there's nothing wrong with calling a fighting game a fighting game. That's much more helpful than something generic like "action", which doesn't tell the reader much.

Anyways, please keep this in mind, as to avoid any further blocks for this sort of activity. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  20:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Another note: Categories also apply. Smash Bros as a martial arts game? That's a terrible call on multiple levels. I'm losing patience here - you're making a lot of bad decisions that require others to clean up after you. Anymore unsourced/bad call genre/category additions and you're going to be blocked from editing again. Sergecross73   msg me  15:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Usual Suspects.  The Old Jacobite The '45 12:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Goodfellas. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite The '45 11:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 13:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)


 * For any further unblock requests, please note that I just blocked as a WP:DUCK sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request
This does not address your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Nor does it address your violations of WP:BLP on this account. Or, for that matter, your violations of WP:BLP on your other accounts, too. It's manifestly untrue that you have "only contributed for usefulness". --Yamla (talk) 23:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion
Note that this user has engaged in block evasion as of August, 2018, and is clearly not acting in good faith. Please consider banning them under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

New chance
There's zero chance of this unblock request being granted. If you are just wasting our time, I may as well revoke talk page access. I'll refrain from doing so for one hour, though, to give you a chance to remove or significantly alter that unblock request. Also note that you appear to be banned under WP:CBAN, so need to specifically go through the WP:UNBAN process. --Yamla (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

As you have chosen not to do this, as you've been evading your block recently, and as you are clearly just wasting our time, I have revoked talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly recommend you wait at least six months before availing yourself of that, then apply under WP:SO. You'll need to address your very long history of abusive edits and your numerous violations of policy. Note also that you are banned, not blocked. Saying, "I deserve a new chance" is just wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Crime action films has been nominated for deletion
Category:Crime action films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)