User talk:Delt01

AfD nomination of Impulse Tracker
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Impulse Tracker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Impulse Tracker. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

July 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Short-circuit evaluation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Itmouse.png
Thank you for uploading File:Itmouse.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 02:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yamaha DX7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DSSI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Assbleep


The article Assbleep has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability for this game.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Assbleep-4aces.png
Thanks for uploading File:Assbleep-4aces.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Assbleep
Hello, Delt01. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Assbleep, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Assbleep for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assbleep is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Assbleep until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jackson RR1 BGF.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jackson RR1 BGF.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 03:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

March 2019
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Talk:Glenn Close, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 13:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bill Gates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illegal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bill_Gates check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bill_Gates?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Softmodem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMA ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Softmodem check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Softmodem?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Testing, please ignore this

June 2021
Hello, I'm Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mutual intelligibility, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Megaman en m (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

April 2023
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Hudson & Rex. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Delt01. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Complain as you will, suggesting that I should "blow a horse" is a personal attack.  Chris Troutman  ( talk )  23:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

no threats, please
So you thought it was okay to issue a threat, like you did at User talk:MrOllie? You do not own any page of this encyclopedia. Using words foreign to you like "CEASE" (emphasis yours) might sound to some ears like an insinuation of legal action. Neither behavior is going to be tolerated here, so I recommend you stop editing in this manner before the community as a group makes the decision for you. Chris Troutman ( talk )  17:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a month for persistent tendentious editing at Robert W. Malone as well as for recent threats and personal attacks on several user talkpages. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 23:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC).


 * I've removed your latest personal attack. I've also removed both the expiration date for this block and your ability to edit this page. You will need to leverage WP:UTRS for future unblock requests.Sam Kuru (talk) 10:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)