User talk:Delta40

Vandalism?
Try and add deceased to the Pantera band infobox and see how quick Wikipedia Administrator Nufy8 reverts it. Administrator Wiki alf also makes a practice of rm'ing 'deceased' from band infoboxes. My edits were not vandalism and you use a false edit summary in reverting them. Please be more careful next time. Now all your rv's... have to be rv'd.... which is very time consuming. 156.34.209.209 11:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It is covered in the Ifobox guidelines. The fields are to be used specifically for what they are prompting for. Example genres=Just genres... not Genre1(19XX-19XX), Genre2(19XX-19XX)..etc. Same goes with members. No years... no "instruments played"... no living/dead notation. The role of the box is to be brief. Fine details are meant for the body content of the article itself. Hope this helps. 156.34.209.209 11:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Not editing from an account? I am a former logged in editor with over 20000 edits. But over half of my edits were warnings on IP user talk pages. I so a growing "anti-IP" trend and felt this went against what Wiki was all about(despite my own seemingly "anti-anon" edits/warnings) I decided one IP ought to be noble and trustworthy... so I rejected my previous account and became an anon myself. Over 20000 anonymous edits later and I still feel "right" about what I did. Wikipedia was built on anonymous contribution. When I am at work my IP is static. And that IP has numerous Barnstars for anonymous contribution for what I have tried to accomplish. If had wanted "personal Wiki-glory" I'd start using my name again. But names are only good for those who feel they want to be an admin(a nomination i turned down 15 times). Unfortunately, the way Wikipedia works, if an "anti-anon" admin sees your report to ANI I could be blocked. I have lots of Wiki-admin friends who would unblock me.(Wiki alf, Bubba Hotep, JoanneB...etc) But I will not ask them to should it happen. That would not be proper protocol. Wikipedia is a noble project. For both logged users and anons too. WP:AGF is one of the most important rules here. Although I admit my own AGF is stretched thin and only reserved for those who have earned it. And to me, you have earned mine because you felt you were helping Wikipedia. And there's never anything wrong with that. Have a nice day. 156.34.212.9 11:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * In reply to your comment. Vandalism removers, like me, have kinda grow prejudiced to anons because of the amount of vandalism. Wikpedia is about a community of people, personally I think registered users are the community, and having a user name would cut down the confusion, you'll find that registered users spend more time on wikipedia because of the sense of community. Anon users don't stay long, and if they do, they get an account. However, your intentions were the best.

Happy editing. Delta40[talk] 11:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I am very good at reverting vandalism. I must admit to being a bit a hypocrite. Yes I am an anonymous editor(sort of... lots of people recognise 156.34 edits) but at the same time I am also very prolific... especially vandalism. This is because I cheat a little and I still use my old username to access my old vandal hunting tools... which gives me "the blacklist" :D . It's so much easier... logged or unlogged... when you can see a great big B beside an IP or username and know that that person is likely up to no good. I can't reject my old account completely because I depend so much on the blacklist. I rv over 200 acts of vandalism/day... most days. That is the bulk of what I do. Policy/guideline peeving just takes over me every so often. Like today. My edits were still valid. The blocking admin has unblocked me.(although I had pretty much unblocked myself) Happy editing to you to. 156.34.213.233 12:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Kim Min-ki
Kim Min-ki, speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- lucasbfr talk 13:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thanks a lot for the barnstar! I will display it with pride. Brianga 19:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Canadian Archaeological Association, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, Canadian Archaeological Association appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Canadian Archaeological Association has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Canadian Archaeological Association and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Canadian Archaeological Association with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Canadian Archaeological Association.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 06:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

Invite to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Asynergy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asynergy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Asynergy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajpolino (talk) 04:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)