User talk:Demansanaallan

”Boxes” out! Virtual ”small and big boxes” my tip to traders and sellers! CLOUD COMPUTING!!!
If you haven't noticed, the days of the virtual reality (an expanded concept) or should I say, computing using the internet (SAAS). Today whether you need to compose a letter, write a research paper, fill out accounting sheets or create a ledger, for those who knew/knows, it’s just a matter of installing a plug-in (after the days of the plug-in or add-in, extensions, or whatever blah blah it becomes, now it is called what? Further back, it was called software and/or application, now I should just call it little boxes inside whatever color of laptop, desktop, or computer you may have. My recent and the cheapest, however, that is what I can afford, is a desktop, an HP computer that can still connect to the computer with a little trust from fellow because it is at least complying to at least a friendly and considerate computer user this one it is tagging, is silver back in the days it's called Tower form factor, now call i call it "silver box." (my silver shoe box with lots of little boxes in the it.

Now, the great news! Big pioneering companies who led the age of computers (medium sized boxes to smaller versions, then smaller to server kind boxes). Despite all those growth in human abilities to adapt to this emancipated boxes (sometimes called CPU, hard drives, and the elderly used to call it ”that box on the desk, ” etc...), there is still no move to standardize these small but confusing terms. What this needs now is an ever inevitable event or catastrophe that must take place again (kind a lot like when terms like "The Judgement of the Nations" is used again!). The said big and great companies should agree upon such necessity (if of course they come to a realization) as a response to the common sense of (not the real common sense as end users understand such word, but the common sense of the planners for then stability and sustainability of their own position in the tech industry. Let me now unofficially announce to you (it will be a matter of days, if not weeks, months, or years)...hehehe;

away from the ”boxes” human! Now your boxes will be moved away from you. Is this good? Anything can be bad or good! Such normal but pessimistic response are always almost an enormous stumbling block to the quick, swift, deserves growth to the common dignity of every person. The age of browser OS (liken to Chromium OS, the Virtaul Machines (a box basically virtually containing several compiler/decompiler, one time called a JVM or middle ware by Oracle).

There might still be a need for such interpreters, however, such will be with the cloud companies. There may still be a need for a box, but the poor and the rich will not need to buy it anymore, the companies will all have those. It will just need a payment to Internet Companies and high bandwidth...

THIS IS THE FUTURE YOU BETTER BET ON! Demansanaallan (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Speaking in Tongues
Guys or anyone @ Cullen328,

The explanation of the "Speaking in tongues" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_in_tongues) maybe considered true for we saw that some religion today did it that way, even in the past as your references proved it such. However, if something is zealed I thought it is a little impossible to hit and open what WAS zealed. Since, after researching (openning books upon books) I found this more appropriate and this TIME can be said about speaking in tongues:

CLICK THIS LINK and this should be proving such is what's meant about SPEAKING IN TONGUES...also excercise care before even commenting in this and think about the implications of this simple suggestion. This maybe said that this somewhat declares that some heretics as accepted by almost everyone and related entitive matters are really speaking in tongues...think of anathema and what such means to you...Saint Paul can be said somewhat speaks this way, either directly when speaking jargons or maybe called a form of a theological words agreed with those under his care: Gentile Christians compare to when he was among those under Peter and James the less' Jewish Christians (if no quotation with the passages that says some no-difference should be still said today since we should already know diversity although many is realy unity if we have LOVE...even if I speak the best langauge in the whole existence if I don't have Love and Charity, all such are nothing.  I edify myself because I am the least compare to anyone, therefore if I am edified anyone first are magnified together with me, and we know before all of the whole creaturehood, God comes First and the Last...

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Speaking+in+tongues+(legal+communication+fetishes).-a030466315

The way people talk in a language that can be called jargons, (a form of language understood only by those who uses it [example pilots flying in a mission typically use these kind of conventions to safeguard zealed or classified things] in agreement with others or not, speaks and understood by the others.

I can also try with anyone who needs kind a demonstration about it if it is indeed this way. However, I can only try and I don't want to set a false expectation. Also, in God's ways, and as for me, everything can be argued and presented correctly and still would sound incorrect; in cases like it and debate is the purpose of anyone; kindly disregard this and whatever you guys wants it to be so be it...

I tried to reach anybody but it seems it's a little challenging. So for mentor @ Cullen328 kindly see if you can help with this...Thanks!


 * )-- Revelation 5:5 --:)

Always be happy. God bless! -Apple- Demansanaallan (talk) 00:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

THE AGE OF REASON-questions, theories, clarification, continued cultivation of this tree
[I went to some garden, there were so many trees. No one goes there and crosses back. but I said this and were saying it. How can I serve things that usually are given in such a way, for most prefer it received that way not by ill intention but because the time is zeal and now open, then today how is that zeal that you now knew not such these are? also when and who opens and zeal our common wealth? there is one tree there to which its infinite fruits are all the most precious stones from all the corners of the whole creation and they who cultivates it knows happiness as how it should be...]

The Age of Reason From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Work by Thomas Paine, published 1794, 1795 and 1807Edit Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Age of reason (disambiguation). The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a work by English and American political activist Thomas Paine, arguing FOR the philosophical position of deism. [Is this the point we want to express about "The Age of Reason...": that it is arguing FOR the philososphical position of Deism? Is this not making it more sounding unjustly the usual selfish and very common religion-bias-many whose intention above all is to introduce he's own religion, buried into the many explanation, citations, great emotion evoking statements, etc...? It is best for us, I suggest, that if we are treating one of those which are solidly ours, that we as much as possible the original intentions of very unique individuals. I supposed most of the men and women who at least care contribute something here if not every one at least heard and or perhaps personally experienced those things that I would rather not mention for it is better forgotten. A thing that probably I had never experienced mainly because I am a Roman Catholic, indeed had received protection from it for I cannot compare those things that abound that calling it many is unjust for it cannot almost be counted, futhermore I was born immediately right after everything had passed from getting settled to again the blessedness of forgetfulness; in grammatical practices it may serve the wider and prudent way PHDs and Liguist (doctors or doctorates) could call it, words before going archaic it goes to a process of some sort of being indexing: times when words that is the same as the reality it represented were already INDEXED...Formosa nearly indexed, but for some it is still Taiwan for they chose not to index, they suffer the agony of remembering as such words vividly paint into their being such horrors:  sleeping or not. Pearl Harbour is famous but outside (said place may exist inside a country Hawaii the reason why it is called differently but that is not the point), it is only Hawaii and is commonly known that it is a place of vacation with unique native dancing ladies happily welcoming everybody with their God given beauty and the native uplifting music and sounds. Some mid-wives are very unique Philosophers...their legacy made others became all-time highly dependable Justices of Great Nations, they commonly settle to serving people pro-bono for a last contribution they want to give their fellow citizen of the whole of our one and only precious place in the heaven of heavens: Earth. And so many of such these things courtesy of those who walked and the Earth trembles because they are our family-and-Friends. Talk to some and they strive to be completely honest: Yea and Nah is enough that it so clear no possible confusion when understanding and dealing with them. And more...

...had a sandwich for such may serve some hunger forgotten and then you may experience a rest extended to you by a heart of one who cares for us all the time.

It follows in the tradition of 18th-century British deism, and challenges institutionalized religion and the legitimacy of the Bible. It was published in three parts in 1794, 1795, and 1807. It was a best-seller in the United States, where it caused a deistic revival. British audiences, fearing increased political radicalism as a result of the French Revolution, received it with more hostility. The Age of Reason presents common deistic arguments; for example, it highlights what Paine saw as corruption of the Christian Church and criticizes its efforts to acquire political power. Paine advocates reason in the place of revelation, leading him to reject miracles and to view the Bible as an ordinary piece of literature, rather than a divinely-inspired text. In The Age of Reason, he promotes natural religion and argues for the existence of a creator god. Most of Paine's arguments had long been available to the educated elite, but by presenting them in an engaging and irreverent style, he made deism appealing and accessible to the masses. Originally distributed as unbound pamphlets, the book was also cheap, putting it within the reach of a large number of buyers. Fearing the spread of what it viewed as potentially-revolutionary ideas, the British government prosecuted printers and booksellers who tried to publish and distribute it. Nevertheless, Paine's work inspired and guided many free thinkers. Demansanaallan (talk) 09:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Satan
This work is going to start to an error that if: not known, can't see the real magnitude and impact in confirming things that have the nature of eternal and just material, neglected, slight treatment due to the enormous and overwhelming agreement of the faithful and the rest alike to the assumed surety of what was and currently accepted, etc., ends up unfortunately in a total waste if time and failure. The article referred to is "Satan" which will be the focus of this work. This has been chosen as one that is of a primary importance because:

1) Being at least not 100% sure that the selected CORRECTNESS is actually correct then all ends up being wrong and the price one gets is a wapping eternal damnation or whatever erroneous evil you may come down with using the usual way we weigh this things and so believe next what naturally follows:  a sure penalty in committing such an error as this, if indeed there is but a little chance that what I am saying here can be at least said  as 'having a point' (if so, this is indeed ...of the primary...). 2)  If the selected CORRECTNESS are based from a long tradition of solid REASON and solid FAITH based (as thought but such is a dangerous blindness - a thing that normally if Christ will be speaking may merit:  get behind me you, or the lips sounds like you are close to Christ but the heart is obviously far, or eyes cannot see? for how can one say not all these is the case if one can't distinguish who is who and which is which?) and this the proposal to be alerted may just really be only 'zealed' (for who among you can really give me what time were all these and also what time is really now (missing link abounds from the Sciences to all sorts of 'ologies,' 'isms,' and the likes). Here since "...time is of the essence..." in all facet of this adage, maybe this indeed deserves an unending 2nd looks. 3) if the CORRECTNESS adapted is actually the TRUE ODD way of understanding such in the normal world.  Here the normal way is as it plainly appears so one should understand it that way; versus:  the way how Wikipedia Concepts and/or Terms are being carefully released to the masses PLUS how a SHAOLIN DRUNKEN MASTER shows how fighting can really be won in MIXED MARTIAL ARTS todays (background of this last phrase:  first Pentecost of FIGHTING ARTS and people are mystically in wondering state looking at you guys and each one asking politely is convulsing in ecstacy, now speaking in tongue each one of them saying: 1. blah blah bleh, 2. ka ka kum ke ko 3. ta ta ti ti mo ho ba. Wait and I am the one explaining to you this: DANGER, DANGER, DANGER, is what the meaning of all this.[although you guys are indeed  using a 100% sure way of how to interpret such (even if we will ask this one point from a Protestant, then a Roman Catholic, then an Atheist, then also ask the Agnostic and the Gnostic, maybe this can be a start for the first time that they, including the intellectuals, can in unity say that it is indeed the correct way how this thing is being handled and in such a way correctly interpretation all along is what we have here:   2nd Samuel 24 and 1st Chronicles 21 or II Kings 254 AND I Paralipomenon 21. 4)  I can go on and not stop but I'm tired because I don't expect to earn anything from this and will be even offended if  any form of gain will at least be attempted or even just be hinted for this.

So prudence and little bit more leverage can be to the least credited to the actual value of winning this BIG GAMBLE, kindly just try these lens (resulting interpretation when the simple way of understanding the said two Scriptures is the one applied, then going through from the beginning up to the last book try to fit all of tis and then ask, isn't that nice or did it sound more like a result of the usual drunken confusion and hangover again?  Here is the resulting thing if the said technique will be adopted and used as a lens and using it interpret the rest moving from start to end and then weight it and see if it is indeed the same putting wine from old skin to new skin (how it is usually done by everyone) is still the confusing wrong way?

+++      +++          +++ ...the LORD...is actually and really Satan 2nd Samuel 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah... -KJVA

1st Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel. -KJVA

If this is true are we going to accused God why He let one of His own son (Satan) be given a chance for His everlasting Fatherhood and forbearance that He always give to you and me? Isn't representing our Father using His Name without doubt (but in reality corrupted really already is our brothers over righteousness and ways that confuses us since the start of the first verse up to the last of the bible). (no wonder: THE LORD IS THE LORD OF LORDS = THE WAR LORD...the LORD WHO ENDED UP Joining because there is no way that He can adopt a NOT JOINING THE WAR LORD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT; and in the NEW TESTAMENT a MESSIAH is expected a KRISTUS or CHRIST came NON war freak Lord Jesus Christ came whose solution is what they call Him:  A NON RETALIATING MODEL cannot be example in our times because it is probably a sort of chickening out behavior when asked to do brave and courageou acts of patriotism for example...If indeed, just like the other Angels of Yahweh are also Yahweh depending if you will allow it that easy, is true; how about my misunderstood brother Satan (according to the Lord Jesus Christ WAS the Prince of that World [yea i am saying that the Lord Jesus Christ doesn't have problems with diction like how my errors are in grammar construction and choice of words, and didn't use such titles for him because probably he is victim also of old skin new skin behavior or maybe try how it is all conflicting to use to him all that He says to the ones He needs to change and how it is now using this perspective or lens ALL his parables and sayings including all His censures not going to miss it anymore? examples: 1 sheep astray living the rest for that one that was lost... the prodigal son and how the good son  cannot be reacting negatively but still in the parable still reacted poorly when the prodigal returned, how hard it is not to say anything about it for the longest time or one can do a little tweaking again and take the confusing sense of justice a wise option left to the good interpreter who dares to comment making the reaction of the elder son actually a understandable reaction of an equally loving brother such a reaction of the older one; no problem is that to the over joyful father who spent all put all  property to this welcoming celebration to the prodigal one; how about the judge of the sheep and the goat deciding oddly to the ones who actually doesn't have an idea if they served the LORD or not. Are they the oneds on the left or the right? Do you belong to the sheep and the goat? In this choice alone is the confusing why did He said that to the ones as judgment when it seems the ones actually asked when didn't they do such a thing when they actually did those:  also giving to the ne3e4dy, giving drink to the the thirsty???I will tell you how you can be deservingly sentenced like that. The sentence are right to such if flat to their faces it is being said you are giving and worshipping the wrong the LORD because you didn't simply believed the simple interpretation the time the Chronicler declared it and this crazy solo interpreter almost beg you and is actually crawling to all of you, if i need to do you a supplication so you can at least do this and taste how the Lord Jesus Christ and our Father is actually good; and after all these pleadings and this simple thing you guys selected the convoluted way of drunken interpretation of that one and only Scripture that is straighter than the very straight and simple way it can be said and done AND YOU DIDN'T select and say LORD JESUS CHRIST please forgive me for thinking you are the LORD since the begfinning: the one who instructed to KILL ALL, RAPE ALL, ETC...that even made the rest of my founding fathers look bad when they cannot believe a God can be like that, not only that twisters upon top of twisters and never ending twistering afterwards to cover everything with the right deep explanation needed, requiring divinities, doctorates, reverend reverend, conflicts, arguments, wars of religions that if somebody can erase it it is better than the best thing that can ever happen to me is the song needed for that wishful thinking:  imagine because of that simple ERRONEUOS interpretation the best and the holiest since the beginning up to the last if not changed one who won the price is a WAR STRICKEN FAITHFUL for no one among us did not suffer or benefit the NOT GOING TO END WARS, etc... +++      +++          +++

simple as how the Chronicler put such a Revelation INSTEAD OF (just give this an honest and fair chance for the sake of your soul and if not yours for the sake of the soul of the one you most love) the really tricky way of not minding that this simple way of doing it is really there no matter how you guys twist it by using lots of denial or connecting chains and chains and chains of verses. Also you worry a lot of things that happened in the past and trying to avoid such names as CATHARISM, DUALISM, heresay, and the likes, we already are occupied with lots of thnings before even starting on things with hope, with faith, with love, and also with prayers, that may it happen that after all these may the wars end up and may my brothers and sisters whose hands are forc3e d always top the that dirty job finally can go home and rest and bed safe and enjoy all the fruits of your labors? Stop and I am tired...may somebody get it and have a meek and mild way so that this can be weather one likes it or not: THE JUDGMENT OF THE NATION delivered. Anyway NOT SAID or SAID to any or everybody is i think the way it looks like, is actually alright to each and everyone, and actually ALL HAVE BEEN acting to the reverse OF THIS WHAT I AM SUGGESTING HERE, the only difference of what is GOING TO BE happening now, you ALL ARE automatically WRONG because now it has been equally WRITTEN! As this is free and is the property of everyone!!!

(TAKE IT FOR IT IS THE BODY OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND THE BLOOD OF HIS COVENANT that I am proposing here to you. The people who interprets your faith now (the LORD is your God...is equal to...Satan is your God) because of the twisting selection they may adapt still with that one and only PEARL OF GREAT PRICE instead of the simple way how it is normally understood (and also in doing this simple way you may do good giving the Chronicler a good faith vouching for the Chronicler that putting the Name of the Lord Your God in vanity is one of the basics among the laws of the Godly before the treaditgions of the tweaking the Scriptures rule should be not hidden top hyour hindsight, if not mention here you will not be ablte to come up with y9ur neext tweak to stay in your blindness so I  managed to not forget and also say this one. Try to manufactrure a reason why it is not violating a basic Law in the 10 commandments not violated if the interpretation of that so otherwise simple without chances of being suffered in this way (by either me ANTICHRIST or you the ANTICHRIST depending without question ALL OF US is either one WHEN WE CHOOSE OR not CHOSE the style you gave already to everybody= AUTOMATIC ARE YOUR CHOICE PEOPLE = NOT YOUR CHOICE IS WHAT I AM SUGGESTING BECAUSE SOMEHBODY OR YOU DECIDED FOR IT TO BE THAT... Demansanaallan (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)