User talk:Demark7

Welcome!

Hello, Demark7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as AXIOMATICS OF NATURE, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of AXIOMATICS OF NATURE


The article AXIOMATICS OF NATURE has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research. Not English. Nonsense.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

It's actually an apparent copyright violation. Wikipedia cannot host content that is copy-and-pasted from other sites. I have therefore deleted it. DMacks (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Your userpage (User:Demark7 appears to have the same problem, so I will blank it for you so you do not have further copyright problems. DMacks (talk) 20:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * This is the English website. Articles here must be in English. There is a Russian Wikipedia where articles in Russian are welcome. One serious problem is that the content itself is copied from other websites. That is forbidden on Wikipedia in general because of copyright concerns.


 * I am sorry if this response is written poorly. I do not speak or type Russian at all, so it is done with Google Translate.


 * Это английский веб-сайт. Статьи здесь, должно быть на английском языке. Существует Русская Википедия, где статьи на русском языке приветствуются. Одной из серьезных проблем является то, что само содержание копируется с других сайтов. Это запрещено в Википедии в целом из-за авторских проблем.


 * Я прошу прощения, если этот ответ написан плохо. Я не говорю по русскому или типа на всех, так это делается с переводчиком Google. DMacks (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Уважаемый коллега!

Посылаю Вам новый вариант статьи AXIOMATICS OF NATURE, подходящий для Wikipedia.

Статья излагает содержание моей давно опубликованной книги АКСИОМАТИКА ПРИРОДЫ (1999 - 2009), освещаемой сайтом: http://sites.google.com/site/axiomaticsofnature/.

Copyright problems with AXIOMATICS OF NATURE
Hello. Concerning your contribution, AXIOMATICS OF NATURE, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from sites.google.com/site/axiomaticsofnature/. As a copyright violation, AXIOMATICS OF NATURE appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. AXIOMATICS OF NATURE has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:AXIOMATICS OF NATURE and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:AXIOMATICS OF NATURE with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:AXIOMATICS OF NATURE.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Уважаемые коллеги!

Статья AXIOMATICS OF NATURE излагает содержание моей книги АКСИОМАТИКА ПРИРОДЫ (16-е изд. 2009). Поэтому авторские права я не нарушаю. Пишу я на русском языке, так как, к сожалению, не владею английским. Этим объясняется краткость моей статьи для Wikipedia, где могут быть ошибки перевода. Mark (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Please read ru:Википедия:Недопустимость оригинальных исследований. Wikipedia editors are not allowed to publish their own original research. De728631 (talk) 18:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Axiomatics of nature


A tag has been placed on Axiomatics of nature requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)