User talk:Demetri

A casual reader of the notes below might presume that I was not acting in the best interests of wikipedia in my editing of the Norwood School article. My editing was intended to remove derogatory and misleading information on the article page, and "talk page" comments that were posted by someone pretending to be a school official when s/he was not. Due to this experience I have shied away from any participation in wikipedia until now. I'd like to set the record straight on this.

Your edit to Norwood School
Your recent edit to Norwood School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Norwood School (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 18:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for your message. I'm afraid that organisations cannot blank the pages about them, per wikipedia policy. Nobody owns an article, and one of the great virtues of wikipedia is that organisations cannot control their own articles. The edis of yours which were reverted by the bot were vandalous, and tantamount to page bloanking (see WP:VAND). If you have any other queries, please don't hesitate to ask me. M a  rtinp23  18:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, please be careful not to remove other epople's comments from talk pages, as you did at Talk:Norwood School. Thanks  M  a  rtinp23  19:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)