User talk:Demetrine

Welcome to User talk:Demetrine

{{unblock reviewed|reason=

This User was blocked as a sock puppet of Lawline. However, Lawline should have never been blocked in the first place and Lawline which was blocked in 2011 should be unblocked. The real story about User:Lawline is that an Administrator was making edits to an article written by Lawline. The Administrator had no knowledge of the subject area but engaged in cyber bullying against Lawline to get her way. Lawline indicated that he disagreed with some of her edits. Lawline also advised the Administrator that some of her edits could be viewed as libelous under New York law. However, Lawline NEVER threatened to sue and always respected the rights of Wikipedia and the Administrator. The Administrator then turned things around and claimed that Lawline threatened to sue Wikipedia which was not the case. The Administrator did this as a ploy to block and ban Lawline so she could could get Lawline out of the way and edit the Article the way she wanted to. Following the banning of Lawline, every User that in any way was associated with or supportive of Lawline was blocked and banned as a "sock puppet" of Lawline. Included in the "sock puppet" list was User:LuckyDan89 who was a college student who had been a Wikipedia user for over 5 years, and who was banned for making one small edit on a Lawline article.

This User has never abused any accounts, has never vandalized any articles, and intends to continue as a productive member of the Wikipedia Community}Demetrine (talk) 10:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)|decline=In your long apologia about Lawline, which I do not necessarily accept, you have wholly failed to address the reason for your block; namely, that you are a Lawline sockpuppet.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)}}