User talk:Demistery

March 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Please carefully read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOR before editing again. Your next disruptive edit will result in a block. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

If you do not mind, I tried to reference first hand witness accounts recited to myself, as a researcher. Do you state that witness accounts are unacceptable?
 * From No_original_research: Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Why was a reference from the commonwealth War graves commission reliably recording the death of someone during the blitz removed? Demistery (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Why have you not read the policy links above that explain why the material is not referenced properly? OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The entry was in the process of being created and was interrupted before it was complete and prevented from being referenced further. It will prove impossible to complete the entry if it is interrupted whilst it is being written. The original entry I placed years ago and has remained all that time and apparently acceptable.

Why was a reference from the commonwealth War graves commission reliably recording the death of someone during the blitz removed?

And please...your interruption is very rude. The author is describing the death of a hero whom died in the war. Such matters must be treated with the utmost discretion.