User talk:Demiurge1000/Archive 13

Regarding copyright applicability for the content sourced from news source and general website.
Hi, Thanks for opening CCI case for my edits. For the listings you provided that passed copyvio. There are some news links as well. Though I will try to correct all those listed. Can you please let me know if there is any difference regarding copyright policies if a given piece of information is modified and published from news source and/or a website and what can be done if there is a favourable case involving sourcing of data like what is mentioned here regrading the information added for the article Paradip Refinery. Hope you are getting what I want to convey. Thanks Gaurav Pruthi talk 04:32, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * No, there is no difference regarding copyright policies if a given piece of information is modified and published from news source and/or a website.


 * Please explain what you mean by "a favourable case"? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

RE: Centre for South Asian Studies Article for Creation
Dear Demiurge1000,

Thank you for responding to my previous question about the Centre for South Asian Studies article. You are right about Douglas Adams and what it means to be notable, but, I was just wondering how this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_South_Asian_and_Middle_Eastern_Studies was considered OK, without many references, whereas the page I created was not OK? Also, perhaps you could take a look at the page I created to help me, because I really thought I put in many external references to show the Centre's notability as a world class research centre.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheActorNetwork (talk • contribs) 20:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Personally, I do not consider Center for South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies as OK, and I have now tagged it accordingly.


 * Looking at your article submission, I think one of the problems is that your references section is overwhelmed with sources that are not about the topic. For example, I just now clicked on the Economic Times link, and that piece does not mention "Centre for South Asian Studies" anywhere in its text. So how can it be useful to prove the notability of the centre?


 * Increasingly I feel that almost none of these many sub-divisions of university faculties are sufficiently well covered in reliable independent sources for there to need to be a separate Wikipedia article about them. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page edits, as you did at User talk:AutomaticStrikeout, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kiefer .Wolfowitz  00:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please ignore the above warning that I too got, and feel free to come into the discussion on Kiefer's talk page (as long as he does not delete them) TheOriginalSoni (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You are requested to look at the AN3 notice board as a recent event (Report and subsequent blocking of Kiefer) involves you. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 01:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. Same old disruptive behaviour from him that's been going on for years, I'm afraid. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Difference between revisions: Basildon Academies
Hi, Following your message regarding difference between revisions, I would like to clarify that these changes made were intentional. The Academies have recently undergone huge changes within their structure and are now under new leadership, hence the need for change to the information on the Wikipedia page. I am unaware of who created the initial material, and although backed by many citations, this material is now dated and in need of ammending. The individuals who are listed and mentioned in the 'Basildon Academies' Wikipedia page are no longer members of staff at the school, thus providing a need for the information to be updated accordingly. It would be much appreciated if you would be able to revert your decision to undo the material posted by myself -user Young331. Many ThanksYoung331 (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I can't revert my edit, because the material you added included things like:
 * "It offers a unique learning structure"
 * "committed to ensuring all students have access to a range of opportunities and experiences which raise their aspirations and broaden their horizons, developing ambitious global citizens"
 * "inspire all students, ensuring they leave with the skills, qualifications and confidence to succeed in the 21st Century, whatever their chosen pathway"
 * "Alongside a rich and varied curriculum, which is continually being developed and expanded to meet changing demands and expectations"
 * "global internet phenomenon"
 * "unique experiences"
 * "developing key leadership skills for all students, invaluable for their future education and working life"
 * "dedicated to raising results and attainment at all levels"
 * "strengthen and accelerate the rate of change"
 * "welcoming and vibrant environment"


 * ... all of it completely unsourced.


 * This is not encyclopedic material; this is marketing material. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * That's quite all right - it has been an interesting process, and seems to have helped the article along some more even without the green blob.


 * I don't think there will be a next round, as if one sidelines Peel as a source then two-thirds of the subject's career don't have sufficient sources to give anything resembling proper coverage. (Tabloid newspapers from the 1960s droning on about how wonderful he was, and a handful of tabloid newspaper journalists from the 1990s droning on about how wonderful, in their personal experience, he wasn't. Plus a BBC documentary that has a fair amount of footage of him, but only provides a couple of actual hard facts.)


 * This was how the article looked before I started working on it, mainly authored by User:Emeraude who duly showed up at the GA review. The problems with that version were what led to a discussion on the talk page where it was suggested Peel's book should be used to fill in the holes and provide some neutral coverage with appropriate weight for what the subject was actually notable for. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it'll be tricky. Technically, though, there's no length requirement for GAs, so even if this boils down to only a handful of paragraphs of verifiable information, it could be renominated. That may be more trouble than it's worth at this point, though. In either case, thanks again for your work! Don't hesitate to ping me if there's anyway I can help in the future. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry this has come up - it never occurred to me the Peel book was not considered as reliable. I have put the review on hold for seven days to see if there is any more response from the RS board (sorry if that is just prolonging the agony). I still feel it is an excellent article and the work done on it deserves to be recognised.   SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  08:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't see that it can become a GA, as there's three separate aspects of its sourcing that are problematic (two of which were present before I had any involvement with the article). As well as the BBC documentary mentioned above, I did plan to get hold of Tim Card's book, but that, although it boasts a "respectable" publisher, would be difficult to regard as an independent source - and by all accounts didn't have much detail anyway. (One could wonder why Peel did not find an equally good publisher for The Land of Lost Content as he had for his other books, and speculate that a balanced portrayal was not what the literary establishment wanted on this topic in the mid-90s. Animal Farm was a similarly unwelcome perspective in the mid-40s. So it goes.)


 * I'd already listed on the talk page the books likely to have useful coverage of the rest of his career, but most of them are histories of second-rank schools, and such books tend to have an air of self-publishing about them in one way or another, so don't really help us along. (One of my employers was once involved in something similar, a history of the organisation in hardback, and ordered one copy for every member of staff in addition to however many they thought necessary for other purposes. The books arrived on a pallet, several thousand of them. Sometime later I happened to walk through the warehouse and the pallet was still there, with all but a few hundred of the books still in it. Unlike Peel's book, I doubt it ended up in many libraries.)


 * If you do decide to read Peel's book, I must warn you that there's a very unfortunate incident involving one of Chenevix-Trench's dogs about half way through.


 * Meanwhile, I'm beginning to wonder if Pentland Press might be notable.... --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

AFT5 re-enabled
Hey Demiurge1000 :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Assistance
I appreciate and understand the removal of my additions to The Ensworth School. Can you advise the best way to remove or update grossly inaccurate updates about our school. They permeate almost every section. Many of the updates have citations do not actually confirm or relate to the update. If I delete the incorrect statements, I get notes that say I am the vandal. I want to work within the rules of Wikipedia and increase the accuracy of our school's listing. Thank you. E1958 — Preceding unsigned comment added by E1958 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Basildon Academies
Just FYI, you're mentioned on my Talkpage by editor Young331. Don't know if you want to add your 2c. Cheers,  Yinta n   17:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for mentioning this - sorry I've been rather wrapped up in other things. You are quite right in your reply, but we still haven't quite fixed the underlying problems, and thus the complaining editor is still floundering around on the article itself. We should probably make an effort to do a basic update of essential facts (who the headmaster is, and so on), because otherwise we're repeatedly deleting promotional/copyvio updates that might actually be more accurate than what's in the article itself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry......
It's sometimes difficult with vanity publishing - there is a breed 'bible' that was self published in 1976 and before he died the author eventually burned all the remaining copies in the 1980s. It is just about to be re-printed as copies of it were selling for £500 (luckily a friend gave me a copy years ago!). SagaciousPhil  -  Chat  09:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all your hard work on this. I had decided long ago that the article was clearly not headed to FA due to the catastrophic narrowness of the sources available - but I thought GA might be do-able. In the end, it seems the article itself is happier without the GA status! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 08:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Concerning Telos Publishing.....
.....the prod was contested, and subsequently the article had to be restored. Mind, there is a campaign against "Them" going on here. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

On 17 March, you proposed deletion of Telos Publishing. The article was deleted, but has now been restored, following a request at Requests for undeletion. You may wish to take it to WP:AfD. (Incidentally, the editor who requested deletion wrote "Feel the deletion is part of some sort of campaign against us", which suggests that he may have a conflict of interest.) JamesBWatson (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking a the first sentence of the article, the conflict of interest seems certain. When I wrote the above comment I hadn't seen that Lectonar had already posted a message about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry for not replying sooner, I have been a bit overwhelmed. I will look into this when I get a bit more time. The conflict of interest is not an overwhelming issue in itself. Interesting that this comes along just when I'm considering creating an article about Pentland Press (now happily defunct). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Thanks! I shall have someone go through my past contribs until they find something related to canines :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Apologies
What the fuck I don't remember reverting you! Morning, I was testing wiki in my android and maybe it's that time I accidentally touched the button. My apologies again... Cheers,  TheStrike  Σagle   11:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You might find this or this of use... — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 09:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * No worries, I see this a lot now and I usually realise what it was! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Unjustified removal of text
I have put the following information onto wikipedia pages, which is both relevent to the topic and in the public interest. No personal views were expressed, and the information is 100% factual. There is no justification to have removed the information I added. The user 'Demiurge1000' is obligated to explain their views and justify in fact why they feel the information I added should be subject to removal i.e. not just say why but explain why also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesTl54321 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually I'm not obligated to do anything. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Trashy Bags
I left a message on the talk page. I'll be leaving an even longer message on Unforgettableid's talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 05:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! This saves me (hopefully) from writing out what would have been one of the most tiresome talk page RFCs of all time. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

‎Azeem Azam
Thanks for the notification. GiantSnowman 13:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
I am sorry that I confused your edit with "vandalism" (my edit summary was obviously improper!) Truly my mistake ~

DanielTom (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 


 * No worries. And thank you for the small mammal. Around here, we use them as ingredients in pies... please have a slice of this one! Don't worry, it's a special apple-free recipe that I was taught by a resident of the formerly (but no longer) cat-ridden town of Wigan. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:56, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * "Why tempt ye me?" Hmmm... I guess it's okay to eat a "virtual" cat. ~ DanielTom (talk) 09:14, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * : a useful source... Martinevans123 (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC) .. or you might find our "sister site" more informative?
 * I notice they describe them as "meat and potato pies" but very carefully don't specify what sort of meat is involved. Cunning.


 * The pie shops round here were forced for a while to describe their meat and potato pies as "potato pies", on the grounds that the filling consisted of a lot of potato, a small amount of onion, and tiny flecks of grey-ish meat. Delicious, so long as you didn't worry too much about exactly what was in them! (Reminds me of the Wikipedia sausage analogy.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

"Six moves"
Re 's edit summary: I assume that xe was referring to this sort of move.  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * That's a pity... I rather liked the idea of her sitting there experiencing six of the greatest and most influential movies. According to that article, "six relocations" would, in total, be more stressful than the death of a spouse. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Heh—indeed, indeed.  Theopolisme ( talk )  14:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I am back!
Hey! Guess who is back from a long wikibreak! Your little friend! Ender Wiggin (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Back to cause more chaos? Excellent :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * You wish that was why! Ender Wiggin (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Ref desk capers
Hi Demiurge1000.

Your removal of a bit of dialogue seems like over-kill to me. I asked Shadowjams for an explanation of that strange statement, and I’d really like to hear it, or see him withdraw it. Sweeping the exchange under the carpet as if it had never taken place does not remove it from anyone’s memory. A hatting might have been a more moderate remedy. But as it is, I think I’m going to revert your removal.

Cheers. --  Jack of Oz   [Talk]  22:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Capers will probably go nicely as an ingredient in the pie (see above). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Never did get anything useful, did we? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * And? That doesn't justify your removal of it.  You may as well say we should not have any laws on the statute books because people are just gonna break 'em anyway.  Policing/compliance is a separate issue, and there are always resource constraints (such as time).  --   Jack of Oz   [Talk]  21:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Adventure: Text Mockup (feedback welcome!)
Hi TWA folks!

It's been a long time since we worked on The Wikipedia Adventure together, but this spring I proposed the game for an Individual Engagement Grant and it was accepted :)

I spent the last two months refining the script and getting ready to build the game using Guided tours. I am working with an amazing designer and getting expert curation tips from the Grant program leader.

Here is the full 7-mission text version of the game: http://jatspan.org/twa2.html#29

I'd love to have your feedback on it, before I get started with the build. I would love it if you would leave any thoughts, tips, comments, recommendations, suggestions, ideas, or concerns, at WP:TWA/Feedback.

Hope you're doing great,

--Ocaasi 14:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Congratulations in finally getting action underway on this - to be quite honest, I was personally convinced nothing would ever happen. An important initiative, and I wholeheartedly support it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * thanks! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks =)
Hello,

Thanks very much for your edits on Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802. Hope you enjoyed reading it. If you can think of anything we need to improve please let us know,

Thanks again =), Staceydolxx (talk) 08:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem, thank you very much for taking the time to put the article together. It's an important and significant aspect of the history of industrial relations in the UK, and it's great that there's such thorough treatment of it on Wikipedia now. I will try and come back with some suggestions for improvement when I have time. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello, your name was mentioned in |this discussion on ANI. Also, an IRC discussion that you had with the user being reported has been copy/pasted into ANI. You may wish to comment on this. Regards Blackmane (talk) 09:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know - replied there. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Adding a photo
Demiurge1000, Many thanks for amending my entry - much appreciated. I can certainly find a head shot or similar of myself. Just point me in the right direction of form-filling or where I need to go. Just looking at the entry again, I see there's a small error, saying that I was councillor in the Embassy. Common mistake: councils have councillors, but Ambassadors need counsel, so I was a counsellor. Regards, HyegyongHyegyong (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Martin, thank you so much for the help - it would be really great if we could sort out a photo. I've replied in detail on your talk page - User talk:Hyegyong - about the steps required. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposal at TAFI talk
A discussion that may interest you is occurring at Wikiproject TAFI's talk page at Proposal: use Theo's Little Bot to automate the schedule and queue. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Chenevix-Trench
Just read the article and thoroughly enjoyed it. Spectacular work. &rarr;  Stani Stani  00:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Is it too long and drawn out, though? I've just looked at it, and it seems terribly humdrum; a procession of long pieces of text.


 * There's only two more of the one-penny editions of Mark Peel's book left; be sure to buy before the price increases by several thousand per cent! :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm reliably informed that one of the £4.90 (condition "very good") copies just sold. Some of my correspondents refuse to buy books where the condition is listed as only "acceptable". I think they should be more open-minded! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay responding. I felt the article built piece upon piece nicely and showed the social changes during Chenevix-Trench's life as a backdrop to how public opinion of his methods evolved. I'm half English, and served a half year in a school which had disciplinary methods similar to those portrayed. &rarr;  Stani Stani  07:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Which half - Stani or Stani? The last one-penny edition has now sold - I assume you were the purchaser?


 * Much of the changing social backdrop contrast may have been unintentional on my part (or maybe a result of Peel's book?), but it did strike me that a great deal of the "controversy" in the 1990s was based on events in the 1940s and 1950s which would not have been seen as especially unusual at the time.


 * Certainly I saw facets of Chenevix-Trench's character that were reflected in teachers that taught me. Bizarrely, one of Chenevix-Trench's contemporaries later taught me at Oxford, and was the subject of some quite humorous commentary, on the subject of corporal punishment, from an Old Etonian fellow pupil. I'd better stop there as both are still alive and well!


 * Risking striking a discordant note, but I have a comment on a topic that I think you contributed to at your forum thingummy. For some reason, I was mentioned in the discussion about that Bernstein fellow. Maybe because I'm Jewish (or black?). I thought you should let your fellow forum reprobates know that there was a strange coincidence here - Bernstein and I actually had a "live" discussion a few days ago. Sadly he did not see eye to eye with me, or with anyone else present. But perhaps he recorded the entire discussion so that others can see how cruel and heartless Wikipedians are. If so, your fellow W*crats should ask him about it :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trinidad and Tobago Chess Championship
I have looked at several of the Wiki pages on Chess Championship from different countries and I believe that I have presented more sources (especially in Newspaper articles) than several of them (Albanian, Panama, Bangladesh, Jamaica to name a few). In some countries Chess is not considered highly, so sources other than newspaper articles, the FIDE web site, and the Chess Association will be rare.

If this article is not accepted, there is the possibility that the early history of chess in Trinidad & Tobago could be lost to future generations. Isn't Wikipedia about preserving History? Watcher56 (talk) 03:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Newspaper articles are useful for proving notability. After consulting with a Wikipedian who is also a sports journalist, it was mentioned that the association is mentioned a number of times in books that appear on Google Books. You may wish to add these as references. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JackFrost2121( Frostbitten? / My Work) 04:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

prediction
From what I've seen in the past, one of the few ironclad rules of the internet is that any talk forum that is temporarily shut down will never be reopened, though in this case it would be hard to blame him. Wnt (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Uploading a photograph
Thanks again. I hope I've followed your instructions and used a photo taken by my wife who, not surprisingly, is prepared for it to be used. It's uploaded at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin_Uden.jpg, and the necessary email has been sent in from my wife.Hyegyong (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Just noticed other areas for improvement on this page. The box listing predecessors and successors points to the wrong Julian Evans. Right name, but not the right individual; the Julian who succeeded me is now the No 2 in the British High Commission in New Delhi. I should also have noticed that the reference to Ban Ki-moon's appointment of me is strictly correct, but omits the more interesting fact that I coordinate the Panel of Experts on sanctions against the DPRK, established by Security Council resolution 1874 (which has its own wiki page). Boy, it would be easier if I could correct these things myself, but I fully respect the reasons not to.Hyegyong (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * That's great, I've added the picture and a basic infobox (is "Occupation: Diplomat" still correct if you're now advising/policymaking rather than engaging in diplomacy?)


 * I've also fixed the link to Julian Evans such that it doesn't point to the wrong person; instead, someone may create an article that will go at Julian Evans (diplomat).


 * The purpose of the panel is indeed much more interesting, given the attention given to North Korea on the world stage. I will have a look for a reference for this when I have more time. Thanks again for your diligence in helping to correct and add to all this. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I've now added a mention of the North Korea aspect of the role, citing some UN press conference transcript. The email about the photo has been received and processed and accepted, so the copyright is all fine. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I really am so grateful for your help with all this. Looking at what else should be on there, when reviewing similar articles, most entries have more detail from earlier careers. Mine can be found at http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-1.nsf/54e6de9e0c383719802572b9005141ed/b921fbad6e20d33e8025734b003e670e?OpenDocument. Of course it’s also all in Who’s Who, but that’s not available easily online. Up to you whether this is worth doing. I also hadn’t noticed that my other book isn’t listed. It’s Martin Uden: Times Past in Korea: An Illustrated Collection of Encounters, Customs and Daily Life Recorded by Foreign Visitors ISBN-978-1903350065. One further idea is that the current job is one of some distinction. I feel that just as the ambassadorial jobs merit mention under Offices Held, so does the Coordinator of the DPRK Panel. My predecessor, John Everard, also had a wiki entry, so there’s an easy link to make.Hyegyong (talk) 01:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I've added the other book. I'm mildly confused by Everard being "British Ambassador to North Korea" (so Wikipedia thinks)... is he? I do agree that Co-ord of the DPRK Panel is rather important, but creating a new and entire template and boxes about that is beyond my means right now. It may be that Wikipedia has boxes for some things but not for other things.


 * A teenage son of a friend of mine is very interested in all manner of Foreign Office things... are there sometimes summer placements for 16 to 19 year olds? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll have a crack at updating John's entry - he left Pyongyang in 2007. Quite understand about templates for boxes. Hardly a massive issue. As for FCO placements, take a look at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-office/about/recruitment#work-experience where the current range of possibilities is listed. Don't know if your friend's son would qualify for any of these, but worth a look.Hyegyong (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I'm glad that after the disappointment with ACT's main article you were still able to get at least one GA out of your research. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Just stopped by to say I echo Khazar2's sentiments above! Well done on the GA - I know my opinion probably doesn't count for much but for what it's worth I still think it's a shame the ACT article wasn't able to be recognised. Thanks for your work on both articles, I enjoyed reading both!  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  18:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Many thanks to both of you, and sorry for the very late reply. The presence or absence of a green blob on the ACT article is not a great worry; I've always been more interested in the quality of the article as a whole, and both of you have helped that along as well. (There's still more to be added to the ACT article, particularly when I finally manage to get hold of the Fettes history that apparently discusses him in quite some detail. Naturally future decades will also produce new histories of Eton and other relevant places, and rumours from those nearer such things tell me that his reputation there has undergone quite considerable improvement in recent years.) Please do also keep an eye on The Land of Lost Content, as I will probably expand it still more when I have time, and it would be useful to have feedback on whether additions are appropriately neutral and adequately sourced.


 * Sadly, I couldn't find enough to justify a separate article on Pentland Press! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

AN discussion
I have started a discussion about you and some others at Administrators' noticeboard/Archive249. Fram (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

You have a message!
- Jayadevp  13  02:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

- Jayadevp  13  03:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

- Jayadevp  13  14:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Why are you not replying. If you do not reply, I will have to revert your edits to the page Oceansat-1 with slight modifications. - Jayadevp  13  05:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please take a look. New message! - Jayadevp  13  04:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

New message again. - Jayadevp  13  18:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hero(n)
Hi Demiurge1000, I thought you we just being cute with your edit summary and wanted to maintain the Latinized spelling of Hero(n)'s name, but I see you've warned the IP. It was a good faith edit: the Greek name ends in a nu, so Heron is a viable spelling. Just a heads up in case you want to delete the warning.  davidiad { t } 04:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Ha, I should know better. I didn't look at the wikilink properly. I've gone ahead and blanked the note on the IP's talk page - thanks. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I've done stuff like that, too. It was a good revert anyway, since the other Greek names in that article are Latinized. Later,  davidiad { t } 04:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Comment deleted?
Hi Demiurge.. You seems to have accidentally deleted Lucia's comment during this edit, maybe possibly due to edit conflict. If it was accidental then kindly restore it.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 02:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note - I've re-added it. I'll refrain from commenting on whether it adds anything of value to the discussion! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Prabash ''' What?  18:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Article declined
Hello,

You commented that my article of Hector Rosales was probably declined due to lack of secondary sources which would have helped to contribute to the article's reliability. The problem I have had from the very beginning is that there is virtually NO information on the life of Hector Rosales. I found two sources on his life, one of which was the website entitled, hrosales.com; the other website, which was incredibly short, appeared to have taken its information from the hrosales.com website. I did find Spanish language websites, but these just comment on and reviewed his poetry and other works. I would not have picked this person to write an article about had I known this, but this was a Senior English class assignment which we all had to complete for a class grade. With so little information out there on H. Rosales, do you honestly feel that the teacher was misguided in his assignment to write an article on an author who was listed on the Wikipedia "authors who have no articles published on Wikipedia"? Because, now, after the fact, that kind of seems to be the case???

If I am not allowed to use the author himself as a credible source, that pretty much left me with no information, yet every one in our class HD to pick an author from the Wikipedia list. I guess maybe I just picked the least suitable (for information) author?? I would really appreciate your thoughts on this!

Pepetink (talk) 14:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC) pepetink

PS. I received an A+ on the article!!!!
 * Class assignments (usually essays) may not be always suitable for Wikipedia because our referencing standards may be higher than that of educational institutions. Ignoring that, I would say that two websites do not show notability, especially as it is a article about a living person. Looking at the AfC page, I would suggest that you reference the unreferenced parts of the article so the content is verifiable — which can be done with anything from web pages to books. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * apologies, I hit rollback on my tablet by accident and removed the above. Now replaced. Sorry! Pedro : Chat  17:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rob Riley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Abortion in Latvia
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting - it was indeed a mis-click as i was hovering over the history and I clicked the revert by mistake. Apologies for the same. Amit (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Corporal punishment in the home
Hello, you undid my contribution on the page of 'Corporal punishment in the home'. Under the heading 'Views on corporal punishment' I put the view of world renowned expert on child abuse, Alice Miller. I linked to the Wikipedia article on her, and I gave the sources, namely her own website, the exact page where she states her views on corporal punishment, and her own flyer on the subject. You reverted this and said: "You need sources that comment on her views or describe them as significant, in order to make claims like this - discuss on talk page." However, the fact that Alice Miller is an expert on the subject, I linked to her, and the fact that I gave verifiable sources for the views stated by her, seems more than sufficient. It is not required to have others to comment on her views, as they are her views, an regocnized expert in the field, and her views only. That is why I put this under the heading "Views". Please comment. If you fail to convince me, I will have to revert back again, as her views are highly significant and relevant, and need to be included. The other entries given under views, do not have sources commenting on their claims either. You seem to make an exception in the case of Alice Miller's views. Thanks, Jeroen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeroen1961 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I've removed "world renowned" from the article about Alice Miller herself as well - see WP:PEACOCK. (Did you write some of that article?) She is certainly a notable psychologist, by Wikipedia's standards. "Recognised expert in the field" is rather more problematic. I don't see why her views can't be mentioned in the article, but certainly not in the form that you have edit-warred to include thus far. I'm also open to the idea that there is other material in the article which would be best removed (or trimmed). However, the best place to have these discussions is on the talk page of the article itself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Clarify the message on Jimbo's talk page
Just wanted to let you know that was a typo on the edit history of Jimbo's page. It should have been Wasn't Demiurge but I mistyped. My apologies. Kumioko (talk) 20:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * No worries... the result does not look outrageous. Thanks for closing these down in a thoughtful manner. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Corporal punishment in the home
If you do not see why Miller's views cannot be included, why remove them? I did not edit war, I simply reverted my initial contribution, as I was unable to contact the person who undid it. I did contribute something to the article on Alice Miller, but not the words 'world renowned', which you removed. I am happy with the removal of that. But I am not sure now what is an acceptable way to tackle the problem, I want to include Alice Miller, but have been barred from doing so, on questionable grounds. Do you have any suggestions? Shorten my contribution to a singel sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeroen1961 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I did indeed have some suggestions, and I already put my suggestion to you in a reply on this very page only a few hours ago. You should be discussing on the talk page of the article.


 * As for "a single sentence" - yes that might be helpful, but what is it going to say? That Miller considered that all crime and violence in the world (everything from petty theft to genocide, apparently) is the result of all parents being abusive to all children, and that corporal punishment in the home was part of this? Or something more nuanced? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Luis A. Cordero Article
Hello Demiurge1000, my name is Alicia Berrios. I am currently writing an article on a notable attorney located in Miami, Florida by the name of Luis A. Cordero. I have seen many other attorneys in Wikipedia and I strongly believe that Luis A. Cordero should be on it. He well known in Miami and is on the map. I have been editing the article with other wonderful people that have been very helpful. I was told to contact you so that you can review my situation and possibly help me. I look forward to your response. Thank you.Alicia De Los Angeles Berrios 18:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aberrios13 (talk • contribs)


 * Sure, I'll try to take a look at this at sometime over the next three or four days. Feel free to remind me if I forget! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Aberrios13 simply needs to heed the ample advice already provided, e.g. at Articles_for_deletion/Luis_A._Cordero. After many reminders of many kinds about sigs, he still never even sign his posts properly.  It feels like he hasn't read his talk page or a single one of the WP: policy pages he's been directed to. --Elvey (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, he obviously read his talk page or some other talk page enough to follow the recommendation to come here.


 * If there's been an AfD then it would need some really exciting change to make the proposed article Wikipedia-worthy. I'll look at whether there has been such a change over the next few days. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

why am i getting these mails
Hi Demiurge I don't know why i'm getting mails saying that I erased things on here i hardly use this site and I don't know how this works. So no I haven't erased or removed anything from your talk page I think thats what it's called. Please let me know why i'm getting these mails and why if you are able to. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.151.22.4 (talk) 21:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The last message I left on your talk page was in 2012. It's highly likely that the IP address you are using has been assigned to some other person or household since then. And thus is nothing to do with you at all.


 * You can avoid irrelevant messages like that one by creating an account - see WP:ACCOUNT. It also has some other advantages, which are described there.


 * I am at a loss as to why none of my talk page stalkers were able to explain this to you. Maybe as the number of stalkers goes up, their abilities go down. Sad. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

How do you know
What is useful and not useful for knowledge? Are you a God of dictionaries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phd8511 (talk • contribs)


 * Why yes, I am actually. Thank you for asking, as I have never been able to mention it before. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia
Gatoclass (talk) 02:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Seriously...
...TWing me with a warning? I have been on WP for at least twice as long as you have, and warning veteran editors is definitely not standard practice here.

Second, I'll take your reversion of my R Quest edit as an honest mistake. If you bothered to look at the sources already on the page including Gibson (2) on self-identification and sources (4) and (5) on the meth-sex toy scandal, you would have noticed they support the assertions I added and are in total compliance with WP:BLP. For now, I'll revert you.

Cheers, &Lambda; u α  (Operibus anteire) 21:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * So you've been on Wikipedia for more than six years, then? So you were a child for part of that period? You don't seem to have learned much.


 * Let me clue you in here. Child or not, you are required to adhere to WP:BLP. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Personal attack. You have been warned. Let's keep this civil.
 * Several sources have reported on the incident, although checking the talkpage, there seems to be extreme censorship. BLP is being followed in that we are attributing these claims to published and reputable sources. Here are a few from a quick google search:


 * The Sydney Morning Herald, one of the oldest and most respected in AU.
 * HuffPo from NyPost.
 * Daily Record, incidentally already cited in the article, but we seem to be selective in what parts we choose to include.
 * And plenty more sources. Actually, I think I might have to move this to the article's talkpage.
 * If those don't convince you, I'll be happy to go find the public records and prove it since I know about this rather well.
 * Cheers, &Lambda; u α  (Operibus anteire) 22:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * "Know about this rather well"? I'm sure you do ;)


 * "checking the talkpage, there seems to be extreme censorship" -- ... ye-es. Actually there seems to be WP:BLP. Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User_talk:Demiurge1000. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. &Lambda; u α (Operibus anteire) 21:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Careful kiddo, or I'll have someone leave an attack kitten on your talk page. Then who knows what might happen. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent Operation Entebbe Edit

 * Hi. I put a neutrality tag by the recent edit removal attempt, and left a message on the IP talk page encouraging them to discuss on the relevant points they wish to raise. Just FYI. Cheers Irondome (talk) 23:36, 2 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll hopefully get back to this and add something on the talk page about it over the next couple of days. Always going to be a controversial article though... --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your deletion of post reverted
A post that you deleted from WP:AN as being made by a banned user has been reverted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Robert, thanks for letting me know. I'm not going to edit war with them over it, since the comment is not particularly outrageous compared with their usual hounding. I do have some interesting reading material for them though! Soon... --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Pakeha Party
Could you please check out this article? It's very sketchy with lack of references. I don't think it's worthy of Wikipedia either.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakeha_Party


 * "sketchy" is probably a good description of it. Maybe you need a local equivalent of the EDL? :) The article is now being considered for deletion. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)