User talk:Demiverse

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liberty Resources, Ltd.


The article Liberty Resources, Ltd. has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * submitted via AFC, and declined, created anyway. Fails notability, no gnews hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Liberty Resources, Ltd. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liberty Resources, Ltd. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liberty Resources, Ltd. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

article deletion
I saw your comment regarding article deletion. Please read WP:Notability and WP:RS and see that the article as written does not conform to these policies. The google search was an attempt on my part to FIND such sources on your behalf, and help you. That search failed. Google and google news search almost every major newspaper and many magazines in the world, and none of them mention your organization. That is a big sign that it fails the notability requirement. By all means, if such sources exist, which meet the WP:RS criteria, add them to the article, and then it can likely survive. As for a good enought reason to propose for deletion - that is rather like a good enough reason for a lawsuit. There is really no such level. Anyone can sue, and anyone can propose for deletion. The eventual outcome of the suit/proposal is what is in question, and that will be decided by consensus. You are free to include your opinion in the consensus, but please do note that policy based arguments (specifically the two I linked above in this case) are what sway the eventual judgement. Find sources showing notability, and you will be able to swing the vote your way. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Fei noh a   Talk, My master 19:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberty Resources concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberty Resources, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Liberty Resources


Hello Demiverse. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Liberty Resources.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Jeffrey Epstein shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jonathunder (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of House Resolution 535


The article House Resolution 535 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTNEWS, minor resolution that was covered in a student newspaper without lasting impact"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)