User talk:Demize/Archive 4

Pozo Colorado
Oh Hell nah I know that stuff I made changes for Pozo Colorado. Sh*t got me f*cked up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.127.166 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Please provide a reference for changes such as this; unless a reference can be provided, these edits will be removed as they are significant changes to the page content. demize  (t · c) 03:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Hydraulic tappet
Don't worry, it was constructive. 80.65.241.12 (talk) 04:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I had to go look at the page itself to see why: I was confusing Wikipedia markup with Markdown, where # signifies a heading. Sorry about that! demize  (t · c) 04:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014 - Big East Men's Soccer Tournament
Thank you for correcting my mistaken removal of the content from the Big East Men's Soccer Tournament page. I submitted a draft of this page under the title Big East Conference Men's Soccer Tournament and was attempting to correct my error in creating a duplicate page - the Big East Men's Soccer Tournament. Perhaps you would be willing to assist with correcting this mistake? It would be best to delete the Big East Men's Soccer Tournament page and/or merge it with the pending draft Big East Conference Men's Soccer Tournament page. Thanks again for your assistance, Slyty3000 (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * First, you should make sure there's nothing left in Big East Men's Soccer Tournament that you haven't copied over to your draft. Once you've done that, then you can simply tag the article (not the draft) for speedy deletion under criterion U1 (User request) by placing   at the top of the page and linking to this discussion either on the talk page or in the edit summary. The mistakenly created article should then be deleted by an administrator, and everything will be good!  demize  (t · c) 20:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Got it done. I certainly appreciate your help! Still in the process of learing. Thanks, Slyty3000 (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Hermitage (restaurant)
Dear Demize,

hereby I request you sincerely to remove the note as it was yesterday, therefore this might have such a negative view of people checking on my fathers profile. Hope for your understanding, best regards, Alex KleinAlexqjklein (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * While I understand why you might wish to remove that part of the article, you can't just erase things that you don't like. Wikipedia aims to be a complete encyclopedia written from a neutral point of view, and so it is important that the reason for the restaurant closing is in the article. It cannot be removed as it is an important part of the restaurant's history. demize  (t · c) 12:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Help!
I've had all I can take with the U-47700. I built the page hoping it would show something useful. Evidently it does NOT. Sorry to be so negative but I'm getting warnings that I might get banned just for deleting my own unwanted work. Thanks for your kind words, it really meant a lot to me but I have nothing to add and nobody else seems to have added much. There is a pure Kappa agonist that has 2 carbons from the aromatic instead of 1, I guess that shows that this class shows an important link, but do I build a page and have that rejected?

My best wishes to you and to everyone you care for, Delia

PS You need to choose a SMILES format. From the way the compound is drawn, I spent a LOT of time fixing this so at least they match... once again, nothing but bitching. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvwynn (talk • contribs) 16:53, 13 November 2014‎ UTC
 * I've replied on your talk page. demize  (t · c) 17:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Between the Lions
The IP editor User:206.116.248.57 you warned for vandalism on the page Postcards from Buster has done vandalism on BTL's funding sections. Because some other edits were made between the editor's, can you revert the IP editor's edits? I already warned the user for these edits and for adding an unverified funding section in Toopy and Binoo. TheGGoose (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I started to revert the edits manually, but after looking through the page history I decided the best thing to do for the moment was remove the section entirely: it was wholly unsourced and there was at least one rather suspect entry to it. I left a message on the talk page of the article explaining my actions there and asking an editor with knowledge of the show to take a look. demize  (t · c) 15:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine to completely remove the section too. Thanks for removing the vandalism. TheGGoose (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you! and a challenge.
Okay Mr SuperBrain, name one other band member in the band Fat Hamster besides Will Champion! I do all this research and then you delete it because you think it is not salient, if you don't allow some updates then wiki has the same pablum as everyone else. If you can name the other member of Fat Hamster besides Jo Ann Ingham I will donate $100 to the Wiki foundation. I will have to contact her personally to find out this info, but it will be worth it. This is extreme trivia but important. It is as important is Stuart Suitcliffe or Tony Sheridan. Good luck!

Dzamula (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2014 (UTC) 
 * I don't personally take issue with including Jo Ann Ingham in that sentence, however the phrasing was awkward and the addition was unsourced. If you can provide a citation for her being a member of the band (which, considering there isn't a source for the existence of the band, would be truly excellent), then I would welcome the change. I might suggest phrasing it differently, as it's unclear who Jo Ann Ingham is. For example, if she was Will Champion's girlfriend at the time: Before joining Coldplay, Champion performed in a band called Fat Hamster with his then-girlfriend Jo Ann Coats (born Jo Ann Ingham). It would make a good addition provided it's properly sourced and provides context.
 * On another note, welcome to Wikipedia! I see you've been around for a while and you've made some constructive edits. I hope that you stick around! demize  (t · c) 20:56, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Closure doesn't make sense
"The users involved have been duly informed of WP:AR, and so it would appear that they're done here." WP:AR redirects to WikiProject Argentina, I suspect that is not what you meant, did you mean WP:DR? --Obsidi (talk) 13:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice, I've corrected it. I did indeed mean WP:DR. demize  (t · c) 13:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

music video mashup
"however I have had to remove them as there were multiple issues with them, including improper use of the tag and the addition of improper external links in the article body." It's your message from my page for the music video mashup editing, I am not very clear what the mistakes are, could you please inform me in details, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yujiao Cheng (talk • contribs) 10:25, 26 November 2014‎ (UTC)
 * You appear to have fixed the reference tags now, however there is still the issue of inappropriate links in the article body. You should take a look at the external link policy, specifically the points on what external links not to include. At least one of the external links might be able to be turned into a reference instead (the article about Saloote), but the rest of them should be removed per the policy.
 * On another note, please remember to sign all your comments either by clicking the signature button in the toolbar above the editing box or typing four tildes after your comment: " ~ ". This helps people know who made comments without having to look through the page history, and it puts in a timestamp that many bots rely on for various purposes. demize  (t · c) 12:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Director
Here is how willing is he is to discuss the matters on his talk page. It's a great thing, you know, to say: "I'm sorry... Can you please stop STALKING me? You're a troll". It's like first to punch some one in the face, then to say sorry and than to hit him even harder. Alex discussion ★ 19:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * @Aleksa Lukic: I'm currently busy with other things and responding from my phone, so excuse my brevity. This doesn't appear to be a content dispute, nor does it really appear to be an issue of user conduct (either on your part or on Director's). If he's removing your comments from his talk page (even with an edit summary about reverting vandalism), then he probably doesn't want to take this any further. The best thing for you to do is to drop the stick and move on. Just ignore Director if he's ignoring you. If you want something done, you'll have to actually say what you want done. There's nothing I can do (and nothing any administrator can do) unless we know what exactly needs fixing. demize  (t · c) 20:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Wrestlemania
Hi, the match at Wrestlemania 26 was a lumberjack match, the members of the hart family were not just present, but added as lumberjacks. You can just see the match as proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.14.222.29 (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * My apologies, the edit by itself looked like vandalism to me—I don't actually know much about wrestling, so I wasn't aware of what a lumberjack was in wrestling terms. I did some research just now, and it appears I was wrong in reverting that edit. Feel free to make it again! demize  (t · c) 22:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate parameters
this edit added a template with multiple duplicate parameters mask. I commented that out. More through CAT:DUPARG. DePiep (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * that's actually how the mask parameter on that template works. It's not a template in the sense that most are, it's actually configuration for a bot. Multiple mask parameters tell the bot to include multiple pages. If you'd like more information, take a look at my BRFA and the configuration instructions for the bots mine is being written to replace. Thanks~ demize  (t · c) 01:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Using a parameter name (or number) multiple times is not documented mw (it is not within accepted practice). (One of the issues is that the sequence becomes relevant). Recently, pages having double parameters are listed in CAT:DUPARG. I won't quarrel about this, but be prepared that more editors will come aling with this. And when templates themselves spread this bad habit they may be edited (corrected). -DePiep (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Demize! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  20:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐ ) 06:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)