User talk:DemocratGreen

CS1 error on Certified Organic Sunscreen
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Certified Organic Sunscreen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20DemocratGreen&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1179438851 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Certified_Organic_Sunscreen&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1179438851%7CCertified%20Organic%20Sunscreen%5D%5D Ask for help])

Certified Organic Sunscreen
Regarding this, your understanding of the field seems again very confused. According to your definition, "A Certified Organic Sunscreen is a third party certified sunscreen product consisting of certified and approved organic ingredients". Both COSMOS and Natrue do certify sunscreen products (here the first two examples I found with google ) and thus they must be included in the page. LostMyAccount (talk) 08:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I believe it may be significantly challenging to secure ECOCERT certification for a sunscreen product due to the stipulations regarding mineral components. Upon reviewing the public customer database provided by ECOCERT, I did not find the mentioned brand, which suggests it might not be currently certified by ECOCERT. On the other hand, NATRUE does specifically certify sunscreens as organic and accommodates reasonable allowances for mineral active ingredients, as outlined on their official website (https://natrue.org/why-us/what-makes-the-natrue-label-unique/). It appears that the NATRUE standard has evolved rapidly, which I may have overlooked or forgotten, hence it was incorrect to exclude them initially.
 * Furthermore, it's pertinent to note that organic natural standards often categorise petrochemical UV filters as petrochemicals, as opposed to organic uv filters. Therefore, I concur that employing the term "petrochemicals" to refer to such ingredients is more accurate and should be adopted in our discussions moving forward. I have edited the ECOCERT section accordingly. DemocratGreen (talk) 06:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The fact that it might be challenging is irrelevant, ECOCERT is a certification for cosmetic products, and sunscreens belong to this category. I don't understand the second part of your answer, could you provide an example? --LostMyAccount (talk) 09:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * "COSMOS standard prohibits organic molecule UV filters in cosmetic product, while allows inorganic compounds only if obtained by well-defined production methods, as they are not from renewable sources" --> COSMOS standard prohibits petrochemical UV filters in cosmetic product . The  standard  permits  the  utilization  of  minerals such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, contingent upon their acquisition via meticulously defined industrial  processes, owing  to  their  lack  of  agricultural  origin DemocratGreen (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Certified Organic Sunscreen


The article Certified Organic Sunscreen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "All primary sources, secondary sources do not speak about the topic of the article specifically as far as i can tell, after inspection thus doesn't seem to be WP:NOTABLE"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Remsense 聊  01:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)