User talk:Democratsunited

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Democratsunited) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Rob Todd
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rob Todd, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view prohibits the removal of material solely because it may be embarrassing for the subject. If, as in this case, the material is factually accurate, relevant to the article, and properly sourced, it must be included to maintain a neutral and balanced article. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Houston Press
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Houston Press. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Also, please remember that additions should cite reliable sources; blogs are almost always not considered reliable. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Robertpercytodd for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ⌘macwhiz (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)