User talk:DemodexFolicolorium

Proposed deletion of Stevie Thomas (restauranteur)


The article Stevie Thomas (restauranteur) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth sources. A number of the references do not mention the article subject."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I have merged this with Draft:Stevie Thomas (restauranteur). Whether in draft space or main space, an article should exist in one place only. It was definitely not ready for main space. Please improve it (particularly the references) and use the button at the top of the draft to submit it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I improved the article and fixed the references. The article was under review but it takes months to someone review it. When I published the article, it was waiting for several weeks and no review were done. I can include new references because every single article at Wikipedia can be improve, but honestly, saying that the article is not ready for main space or that it lacks referencing is nonsense. --DemodexFolicolorium (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I could have as easily speedy-deleted the article in accordance with WP:A7 but I decided to move it back to draft space after I noticed you already had a draft. Yes, it can take weeks. There are no deadlines on Wikipedia. Also, if you have any association whatsoever with the subject, you have a conflict of interest. Submitting an article for review is the only venue that Wikipedia offers for editors with a conflict of interest to publish an article. And nobody said the draft lacks referencing. The specific criticism was that it is "lacking non-trivial, in-depth sources" with some of the sources failing even to mention the article subject. That remains true, and needs to be corrected. Currently the article shows zero evidence that the subject is notable. Please see Golden rule to get an overview of what is expected in an article before it is published in main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Mandatory paid editing disclosure
Hello DemodexFolicolorium. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DemodexFolicolorium. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stevie Thomas (restauranteur) (May 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stevie Thomas (restauranteur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stevie Thomas (restauranteur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stevie_Thomas_(restauranteur) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anachronist&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stevie_Thomas_(restauranteur) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 04:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Trifecta Med Spa


A tag has been placed on Draft:Trifecta Med Spa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Last chance
It is apparent that you are writing articles under a contract arrangement. You have been given ample opportunity to take the advice given above and comply with WP:PAID. This is a mandatory legal requirement that you agreed to abide by when you created your account here. Failure to comply leaves no choice but to block this account. Please do not make any other edits until you have made the proper disclosure. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tres Birds Workshop


A tag has been placed on Draft:Tres Birds Workshop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Thegooduser  Let's Chat  🍁  20:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)