User talk:DemonDays64

Fairport's Cropredy Convention appearances
This is ordered by running order. It should not be in alphabetical order. I plan to revert your changes in the coming days. If you have any reason why the lists should be in alphabetical order please state you case in the talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fairport%27s_Cropredy_Convention_appearances 86.145.179.92 (talk) 23:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

?? I have never edited that page, you're talking to the wrong user DemonDays64 (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * you're looking for User:‎Philoserf. He used my userscript for an unrelated part of his edit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fairport%27s_Cropredy_Convention_appearances&diff=1045932353&oldid=987723570). I do not endorse any changes made with my script outside of what it's designed to do (format quotation marks). DemonDays64 (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Request for rollback
Hi DemonDays64. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ADemonDays64 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 14:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Chetsford (talk) 02:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Christopher Larkin (Australian composer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Christopher Larkin (Australian composer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 15:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * something just change? There has been a note about this on talk pages since I started editing. DemonDays64 (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * No one can be sanctioned unless they are aware, and an alert is the standard way of making sure they are (participation in an Arbitration Enforcement case is another). I'm got almost all of them on my talk page.  Doug Weller  talk 19:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to a RfC on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
Hi, I would like to invite you to a RfC started by me on RfC: Convention for House of Representatives special elections in the United States. Please leave your suggestions if you're inclined to. (You are receiving this message because CX Zoom spotted you on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums and thinks that you'll be interested to participate in the RfC.) Thanks! ---CX Zoom (he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 16:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Traffic light coalition FDP logo
Hello,

I accidentally sent the undo of your edit without giving an explanation by hitting enter.

I agree that it is generally better to use SVGs where possible. However, the SVG version of the logo is not the same as the JPG version I included. Namely, the SVG version has a transparent background, while the background of the JPG version is solid color. Therefore, it is more difficult to tell from the logos where the name comes from. This is also why the SVG version was replaced with an old version of the logo in an earlier edit (1001506760).

Hiculd (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh! I'll make a version with a white background. Thanks for explaining DemonDays64 (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I thought about this and I don't really see your logic. The logo is readable with a dark background or a white background, and while I can't seem to find any written guidelines for Wikipedia about background transparency, logos for all sorts of things are included with a transparent background in infoboxes and in articles. The logo's background color varies between white on their Facebook/website and yellow on their Twitter/Instagram; I think having a transparent background because there isn't a consistent one makes the most sense. DemonDays64 (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I was referring specifically to the yellow version. Sorry if I didn't make this clear enough. It helps with understanding where the name of the traffic light coalition comes from. I would guess that this is what has been referred to as "so that it makes sense". Hiculd (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Ohhh I get what you mean now lol. Yeah I'll copy the old yellow one into a new file in a bit! Thanks DemonDays64 (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Selenium framework logo
Hi I noticed that you changed the file format of Selenium's logo here, but for some reason the image is no longer the official logo. Could you please go check? I didn't want to just revert to the previous file format because there might be some reasons behind your format change. Thanks. Thomas Meng (talk) 20:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * lol something is broken about the SVG. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/Selenium_logo.svg is what it is supposed to look like but it renders totally wrong with those circles. Will try to fix DemonDays64 (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Their Eyes Were Watching God
Hi DemonDays64! Back in June, you added a multiple issues maintenance tag to the top of the wikiarticle, Their Eyes Were Watching God ( verify ). Would you be willing to open a new discussion on the associated talkpage indicating where in the article you see these issues? Also, would you consider adding section tags that tie into the two issues you’ve flagged, namely: Thanks! — Spike  Toronto  17:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * and

Watchlist in chronological order
Please help me with... Hi. Is there a way to see the pages on my watchlist in the order that I added them? Recently on commons I added some pages to it that I noticed some problems with but my watchlist is so big
 * There is no way to change how the watchlist as a whole is ordered- if you did not add time limits to all the pages on it. The watchlist first orders by when pages will drop off the list, then alphabetical; for example, if you routinely add pages, the ones that will drop off the list tomorrow will be listed first in alphabetical order, followed by the ones you added the next day, and so on. If you did not add a duration when you watchlisted a page, those appear at the end in alphabetical order- but there is no way to reorder the list purely by date added.  331dot (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Use he
Template:Use he has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Use she
Template:Use she has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Democracy Index ranking
Template:Democracy Index ranking has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Outdated Democracy Index ranking template users


A tag has been placed on Category:Outdated Democracy Index ranking template users indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, DemonDays64,
 * The template that used this category was deleted in Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 9 so I have deleted this category. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:Democracy Index ranking template users


The page Category:Democracy Index ranking template users has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

"Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_9"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Dumb quotes script
Hello, I was trying to use your User:DemonDays64/Scripts/Dumb_quotes script, but I can't seem to get it working. You can see the troubleshooting steps walked me through at Help_desk/Archives/2022_April_27. Any help would be appreciated. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * While I'm here, I just want to say thanks for the script! I thought the edit summary change from last November was a nice improvement. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * huh that's odd. looking at the script and honestly idk what would be wrong. I don't understand every part of the mediawiki interaction stuff (took a lot of it from another script and wrote the rest >1.5 years ago) but the replacement is just default JS code, no idea why it wouldn't work as long as you're using a normal skin, have JS on, not using a weird browser, etc. Should ask someone else, maybe from the people who list themselves at WikiProject JavaScript. DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 17:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I decided to reset all my preferences to default and it appears to be working now. There must be a conflict with one of the various settings. I'll let you know if I figure out which one it is. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * It appears that WP:WIKED does not work with the script, but I don't think I was using that before. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * It also appears to not work with the beta feature "New wikitext mode." I believe the problem I was having was because I turned on "Automatically enable most beta features." TipsyElephant (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Orphaned non-free image File:The Ghost of Hope cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Ghost of Hope cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * oops i forgot to add it to the page lol DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 20:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Borat is at FAR
Greetings! I want to notify you that Borat is at FAR. This message is being forwarded to the biggest active contributors who were originally pinged back in February. Wretchskull (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Dumb Quotes
Hello, I run into a problem with the dumb quotes script, it changes quotes in file names, breaking the file link. Could you protect file names from changes by the script? Keith D (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh wow I had never thought of that. Will work on fixing it! Thanks for telling me. DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 19:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I think I fixed it by changing it to use a negative lookbehind (supported on everything major since 2020 or earlier, and very recently added on Safari; not sure what this will do on browsers without support but I assume it just gets ignored): . Thanks again!! DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 19:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for quick response. Keith D (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:The Ambassadors - Psalmbook.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Ambassadors - Psalmbook.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 05:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * oh whoops that was supposed to go to commons lol, idk how that got on the wrong site -- will self-CSD then reupload there DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 05:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * or actually didn't realize I don't need to bother an admin to do it for me so I will just transfer DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 05:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Interwiki linking
Thanks for fixing the hard-coded link to dewiki at Robert Bunsen. According to the ill documentation, there's a bot that automatically changes it to a local link when a local page exists (would take care of for you). I have no idea what its lag-time is. DMacks (talk) 12:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Divine Wolves (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)