User talk:Denelson83/Archive page 3

Vexillological symbols: copyright tags
Can you please put an appropriate image copyright tag, e.g. or  on each of your vexillological symbol images (e.g. Image:FIAV 21.png). (I'm assuming that you created each of these images yourself to donate to Wikipedia; please note this explicitly on the image page.) Thanks! &mdash;Steven G. Johnson 00:44, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

It might be nice to put the meaning on each one to make it easier for readers, e.g. for Image:FIAV 21.png:

Comment Deleted?
Why do you delete anything that says you have done wrong off your talkpage? Oven Fresh 02:27, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

January 15 Seattle meetup
Just wanted to let you know we are planning another Seattle meetup on January 15, 2005. We're trying to get a sense of who will attend, so please drop by that page & leave a note. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:56, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
 * You remark on your lack of independent means of travel. If you are interested in attending anyway, say so on the page, say where you live, and mention you need a ride. We had a pretty good contingent from Vancouver last time (also from Portland, Oregon); people carpooled. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:01, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

commons:Image:Ukraine_einfach_Wahlen_3WG.png
Hi Denelson83, you changed the spelling of the kandidates. But this spelling were the correct german transcritions. To help you, I saved your version under a new name (Ukraine_einfach_Wahlen_3WG_english.png) and changed it in the election-article. --Steschke 06:56, 2004 Dec 30 (UTC)

Image:Vancouver Waterfront.jpg


Dunk Driving


Comments on your talk page
I've noticed a few times that you've removed comments from your talk page here, leaving a red "warning message". Speaking from experience, any "negative criticism" you feel is probably being out-weighed by your response. If it were me leaving one of those notes, and I hadn't intended to be overly critical, I'd be a bit put-off. You're welcome to manage this page as you see fit, but can I offer a bit of advice from my experiences? Try to not read too much into things. Respond to the criticism, and point out to the others in your response that you feel their comments might have been a bit harsh. Yes, sometimes people do criticize too much, but anyone can have a bad day. Happy editing. -- Netoholic @ 07:34, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)

Unverified image


Vexillological symbols in articles
Hello! It looks like you were the one who added vexillological symbols to various "Flag of" articles, such as Flag of the People's Republic of China. Just as a note, an image doesn't display properly if it's in the caption of another image. I'll move any ones I find into the article text. If you could do the same, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. --Slowking Man 08:06, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

M postal codes
Hold your horses, they will be finished shortly. Earl Andrew 08:57, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

List of ZIP codes in the United States
Hi there! I noticed you added a section to this article, grouping ZIP codes numerically by first two digits. Are you planning to add anything to those currently non-existing articles? If so, can you tell me what you are using as a source? Also, how will those lists be updated (hopefully in sync with other articles)? I am not just curious&mdash;I've been working on the articles on ZIP codes a while ago, and would like to help if I can.

On an unrelated note&mdash;you can make your username appear as red in signatures, even if your user page is not empty. It just takes a little formatting. But then you may have other reasons not to do it ;)&mdash;Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 15:41, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. I have my doubts about using FIPS codes for counties, though.  This does not look user-friendly, as these codes are not really in common use.  Also, are you going to list special ZIP codes as well (those assigned primarily to businesses and other similar entities)?  What about updates (USPS makes changes to ZIP codes distribution fairly often)?  Overall, however, the system looks pretty good&mdash;way better than the listings we currently have.  Plus, it's about time someone put the ZIPs information in order.


 * Here is another resource for you, which I found to be of immense value: Melissa Data (check their main page as well). They have bunches of additional information not available through USPS, although they limit the number of queries you can submit in a day (which is easily overcome by utilizing proxies).  Hope this helps.  I'll try to join in on the fun if I have time, so count me in if you need help.&mdash;Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 18:41, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Denelson! List of ZIP codes in the United States (and, eventually, all of its subpages) was recently listed on VfD. As I see you are interested in the subject, would you please vote to keep it as it is? Thanks!&mdash;Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 15:14, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Interstate Highway
I don't understand what you mean - "no two three-digit Interstates in the same state can share a number" is correct. Is there something else that it conflicts with? --SPUI (talk) 15:15, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The mainline can and usually does enter more than one state. For instance, there are I-190s in New York and Illinois. But there cannot be two I-190s in New York, even at opposite ends of the state. --SPUI (talk) 21:37, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Victoria map heads up


Before you post another message here
I should clarify what the term "general violation" means. I try to be a good-natured Wikipedian whenever I can, but any time I am sent a message with regard to bad edits, copyright violations, or any other alleged negative contributions, it is involuntarily interpreted as either an assault on my intelligence, an action I take extremely personally, or a pure threat, and I do not appreciate such actions taken against me. If you are going to post a message on this page, it must be a positive comment. Any comments that I interpret as destructive will be disregarded and removed from this page. Thank you. Denelson83 08:47, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Then I might suggest you review Assume good faith and lose the defensiveness. - Ta bu shi da yu 04:40, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Victoria Dot Map image
I really don't want to raise this, as it appears not to have gotten a very good reception last time, but image tagging is quite important. Currently it is tagged as PD, which is clearly not what you intended when you uploaded it as GFDL. Further, in my mind, whether or not it is copyright Gov of BC or not is not clear. Please, all I ask is that you respond to this. This is not an attack or critism. I am merely trying to clear it up. Burgundavia 05:10, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * There is probably a good case for claiming this is your own, as you have edited it substantially. I would just claim GFDL and cite the source. Burgundavia 18:42, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

US 101
US 101 is part of the numbering system, being the next major (X1) U.S. Highway after 91. --SPUI (talk) 00:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Is there a reason you don't link your user name to your talk page in your signature, so I don't have to go into the history to reach it? Anyway, a spur of US 101 would likely be X01 (just like a spur of any other 3dUS), and 101 is special because it is meant as a 2dUS. 163, 400, 412 and 425 don't fit into the numbering system at all, much less as a 2dUS. --SPUI (talk) 00:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"And as for the no-link signature, it discourages people from turning my wikiname blue on Special pages." What's that supposed to mean? Simply make your signature a link to this page, and bypass your user page.

As for US 101, who's to say that AASHTO couldn't make a US 901 as a branch of US 101? That's not really the main point anyway - 101 is a 2-digit route that happens to have 10 as its first digit. If we switched to a base higher than 10, 101 would be A1, but a 102 spur from 2 would stay 102. --SPUI (talk) 00:43, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mmm, yes. Thanks a lot. --SPUI (talk) 00:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Comments from RfC
Deleting negative criticism from your talk page is certainly your right if you wish (even though many would suggest it was bad form to "sanitise" criticism in this way). However, you go about this in a particularly inflammatory way, with the "general violation" messages and the hostile "posting rules" on your Talk: page. You say above, "If you are going to post a message on this page, it must be a positive comment." &mdash; this is not an acceptable demand. Community norms are that you can delete critical comments on your talk page, but you cannot forbid them. The best way to deal with negative criticism is 1) see if there's any substance to the criticism, and if so, modify your behaviour accordingly; else 2) if there's no substance to the criticism, simply ignore it, or explain why you disagree. Posting inflammatory "General violation" messages will only make people angry, and is not in line with the Wikipedia policies of Assume good faith and Civility. &mdash; Matt Crypto 21:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Anyone else reading this message may view the scrutiny directly at Requests for comment/Denelson83. For the record, the "general violation" messages will stop, and any "hollow" criticism left on this page will simply be deleted.  Denelson83  01:53, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)