User talk:Dengero

A barnstar for you!
Thank you! Dengero (talk) 04:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you! Dengero (talk) 08:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

லோடஸ் ந்யூஸ
I am really suprised to see a A7 tag on this article. Did you tagged A7 by mistake or you really understood the article? -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 08:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Translating it from Tamil-->English using google translate provides a surprisingly grammatically accurate article. Plus the logo. Dengero (talk) 09:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I wonder what does Logo and grammar has to do with A7. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 09:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is about a broadcast company launched this year with no references except it's official page, it fits the definition of "unremarkable company", and hence, A7. Dengero (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Raef
I removed the BLPPROD on the article as it wasn't applied legally. There was a reference, the official website, present. A BLPPROD requires no references at all. I did apply a regular PROD as Raef has yet to release any music. Bgwhite (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh true. Thanks for the fix. Dengero (talk) 03:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hasty use of delete tags
Normally editors nominating new articles for deletion are expected to wait some time to make sure the editor has not simply got up to get a cup of coffee. They should also look at who is contributing the new article and if it is an autoreviewer assume that the editor is not producing something with no sources. I'm not massively impressed. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * A mightily long coffee break there. Either way, I withdrew the speedy after you improved the article. Have a nice day! Dengero (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but I had to go to the toilet as well, thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

REALLY Hasty use of delete tags
7 minutes after creation, you marked it for deletion? Come on, give it some time, I just began this, and you already marked it. Please wait a bit, I'll improve it within days. XAKxRUSx (talk) 13:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You should create it in a subpage, improve it until you are satisfied before moving it to the designated title you want it to be. This way, you can improve it in your own time slowly, cut down the amount of work patrollers need to do, and prevent this whole scenario from happening =) Dengero (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well can we give it sometime then? I'll get it up to speed pretty soon. The point is its participating in the Federal Tourism programs, Moscow tourism. The city and country is putting in a lot of money into supporting tourism and western-style businesses - and this is a good example - especially since its the first Federal (meaning, in more than one city) hostel chain in Russia. That makes it pretty notable. In the end, its much more notable and interesting than Ilavia for example, which doesn't even exist anymore. I'll add more references and information as I go along. Hope for your understanding. XAKxRUSx (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, I was meant to remove the speedy the first time, I forgot. It's done now. Happy editing! Dengero (talk) 14:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Please be more careful
Hello Dengero! I noticed that you tagged Clyde Garcia with A3. Please look on the article's history before tagging any pages of any criterion in CSD. The article was blanked by the author. Thus, G7 is applicable. Please be more careful. Thank you! Mediran talk to me! 11:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * True True, I realised the mistake just then too haha. Thanks! Dengero (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your tag within 2 seconds of article creation
Thanks in advance. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied here Dengero (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphan Tags
South Turkmenistan Complex Archaeological Expedition‎ - Give me a minute, please, before you start placing orphan tags on a newly created article. If you look at my edit history, you'll see that I do add cats, links, etc., and often get an article over to DYK. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Just untag when done haha, not like I'm speedying it :P Dengero (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

SPI investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Dengero. Thank you. --YOLO Swag (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  14:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

More hasty speedy deletion tagging
Here's another example. You have already been asked by several editors to slow down. New pages patrol advises waiting at least 15 minutes after creation before tagging new pages (except for attack pages). Please listen to what people are saying and follow this advice rather than continually making excuses. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Firstly, they are not excuses, but valid reasons. At this volume of speedy deletions you are bound to get a few disgruntled creators complaining on one's talk page. Secondly, I will always admit to fault where due, so there is no need to be all tut tut about it. And lastly, I dislike the tone of your message. But in the spirit of Wikipedia, thank you for your kind advice and happy editing! =D Dengero (talk) 23:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * No, there's no valid reason for tagging an article for speedy deletion under WP:CSD a minute after creation. And there's nothing at all wrong with the tone of a message asking you to accept advice and follow consensus-agreed procedures. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Nabeel Shaukat Ali
I declined your speedy deletion request for this article, as it contains a credible assertion of notability (i.e. Mr. Ali's status as a finalist on the TV program Sur Kshetra), and for this reason speedy deletion is not appropriate. If you still believe that it should be deleted, please feel free to take it to AFD. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 16:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmmm this guy is straddling, I might take him to afd or try suggest a merge. But thanks for the heads up! Dengero (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello Dengero. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however,  that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), pure vandalism (G3), and copyright violations (G12) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. — Theo polisme  02:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yikes, 3 in one day. I think I might abstain from this =( Dengero (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Dane Youssef to Dengero at 11/27/12
THE SPEEDY DELETION ON JEREMY VINCENT GARRETT BIO--TWICE

Hi. I read your post. Once again, you all took it upon yourselves to delete my personal bio page on the actor Jeremy Vincent Garrett of "Sweet Valley High" and "Legacy" fame. Why?

It was well-researched. I added links to the appropriate source sites. It was accurate. It was well-written. Well originally, it was especially well-written. But... you all said you wanted the source to be unbiased. So I tried not to make it so opinionated. Not such an editorial. So I did. I even made a clear distinguished contrast from him and Jeremy Garrett. So... what's the glitch? I have to ask.

Come on. I want my synopsis on Garrett back up. I worked hard on it. And I contribute a lot to you guys. A LOT. Check my history.-User:DANE YOUSSEF


 * Your article was deleted here Articles_for_deletion/Jeremy_Garrett. Dengero (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag
Dengero, I saw you put a speedy deletion tag on Instameet. We're about to release our product and already have coverage lined up in addition to significant partnerships. More articles indicating its notability will be added very soon. Likewise, the company is currently seed funded to the extent that is notable. Please let me know what we can do to fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NNV91 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! NNV91 (talk) 07:27, 16 January 2013 (EST)


 * I hope very soon means very soon. Dengero (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Nobodies (Comedy Troop)
Hello Dengero. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Nobodies (Comedy Troop), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The TV and radio shows are a good enough claim of importance for A7. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Ayla Reynolds
I think it should be kept. --Fpw2kd (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * A reviewing admin would see to your request. Contest the speedy by clicking the button on the page. Dengero (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have done so thank you. --Fpw2kd (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you ^^ Dengero (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion for MC Yinka
Hello Dengero,

Please give the MC Yinka article some more time before you tag it for speedy deletion. More than an hour would help. Still developing the article and I am a newbie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Methuselah716 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I tagged it like 2 hours ago...best of luck. Perhaps start a subpage as a draft until you are happy before publishing it. Dengero (talk) 03:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Christopher G. Chute
Hello Dengero. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Christopher G. Chute, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being a professor indicates importance/significance, use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Race Horses (band)
Just a head's up, I have undone your db-band tag to this article, because a quick search reveals several reviews of the band's albums in reliable sources such as BBC Music and The Guardian. Cheers. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   13:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * ty ty! Dengero (talk) 14:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

On a lighter note, a CSD I do endorse is Late Spirits Studios, which sounds like something a bored student made up yesterday. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   14:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

CSD tag
I sympathize with tagging Minedas as an A7 and it may indeed be the case, it claims he is a well known pop singer, that makes A7 innapropriate, I have proposed deletion under BLP prod but if this is removed feel free to tag for AFD. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

replay
hi; why don't you redirect it instead of deletion; thanks in advance---1339861mzb (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well because it's beta...not bata. So...it has to be deleted anyway sorry haha. Dengero (talk) 14:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * thank you; but what is the meaning of haha; because i am not an english man, another thing why don't you creat the true redirecting page---1339861mzb (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Qld MPs
Thank you! They're all super-stubby though, so feel free to expand them if you are so inclined! Frickeg (talk) 11:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UndertheSun.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:UndertheSun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 886 (song)


The article 886 (song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 21:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Funnygirl2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Funnygirl2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ardently Love.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ardently Love.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephilosophy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stephilosophy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Finding Love in Memories


The article Finding Love in Memories has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- HighKing ++ 18:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ardently Love.ogg
Thank you for uploading File:Ardently Love.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also affected: ℯ xplicit 04:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * File:My Pride (Joey Yung song - sample).ogg
 * File:Keanu Reeves Reply.ogg
 * File:Trademark-Only Love.ogg
 * File:Il Divo- Regresa A Mi (Unbreak My Heart).ogg
 * File:Raymond Lam-Love is finding you in memories.ogg

Proposed deletion of File:JeffSeeney.PNG


The file File:JeffSeeney.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)