User talk:Deni smailbegovic

Headline text
FootballMercato has already been visited by more than 150,000 unique visitors in more than 60 countries, and as such represents a notable website from my point of view. Some other sites in the category Category:Football (soccer) websites have less visitors than FootballMercato and they still appear in that category (for example, objectivo.com, etc.). The major part of this website is the free content. Please revoke your request for deletion.

FootballMercato
A tag has been placed on FootballMercato, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Res2216firestar 23:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it's not up to me - I replaced the tag so that an administrator can decide whether or not it should be removed. Only admins have that power, and I'm not one. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 02:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, knowing that it is a truly international, multi-language, and already popular website, it seems to be very reasonable to keep the page such as it is, especially when we know/see that the major part of the content is free.User:deni_smailbegovic
 * It may be international and multi-language, but it does not appear to be notable in an encyclopedic sense. This isn't meant to suggest the site isn't very cool - it just doesn't need an entry on Wikipedia. Take care. --Improv 03:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You have seen two administrators weigh in on the matter. If you wish, you may take it to Deletion Review, where more people will review the deletion. --Improv 03:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Here's a tip: find a article with a subject relating to the subject of the web site, and leave a message on the talk page requesting a link on that page. --Res2216firestar 21:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip but it seems that everybody builds its own "castle" and doesn't want anybody in. For example, I've tried to add an external link to the subject Transfer (football) which is 100% related to our content and our link was removed. On the other hand, a very similar site to ours still remains in the list of their external links. I would prefer to see a more flexible Wikipedia. Our description of www.footballmercato.com was completely neutral. Deni smailbegovic 22:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

FootballMercato
(Je me permets de te répondre en français.)

Bonjour Deni,

J'ai bien pris connaissance de tes arguments postés dans la page de discussion de l'article. Mais ils ne m'ont pas convaincu, c'est pourquoi je n'ai pas jugé opportun de retirer le bandeau de suppression. N'hésite pas à me contacter pour plus de renseignements.

Cordialement, Korg (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Footballmercato.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Footballmercato.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)