User talk:DeniedClub

Discussion
Hello, I didn’t change anything per ce, I set the page back to its original state. From what I have seen most other Wikipedia editors do is, when they set things back to their original state, they don’t add extra citations unless they themselves added their own information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:8501:D390:D4D3:EC7:119:AC39 (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello! Totally understandable where you are coming from, that is why I marked it as a good faith edit. I understand you are trying to contribute and help which is greatly appreciated. The main reason I asked for a source was because a claim that information shouldn't be deleted puts the burden of proof on the editor that restores the content. If you decide to revert the page again that is fine and I won't undo it, but just be aware other editors might revert based on similar reasoning. The best way to squash any doubts on a claim is by adding a credible source.


 * All that being said I really appreciate you opening a dialogue here with me, and I thank you for attempting to make Wikipedia a better place. You should make an account at some point, as Wikipedia could always use more constructive editors such as yourself!


 * Hope you're having a great day:)  Denied Club ❯❯❯ talk?  01:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:89.137.77.239
I removed the link to that pseudoscience article from an obscure magazine. Why was that even there ? Cabinet magazine ? A single obscure magazine on the internet is a valid source now on wiki ?
 * Hey, no worries:) that is fine to remove a source you view as unreliable. This is why edit summaries are so important though, editors do not always have the time to read through every source someone blanks on Wikipedia with no edit summary. I reverted based on that fact and it appeared to be a test edit, but I do make mistakes occasionally. Next time add an edit summary "Removed citation to unreliable pseudoscience source" and I would not have mistakenly reverted it then. Feel free to revert my edit, just please add a summary so other editors understand your reasoning.  Denied Club ❯❯❯ talk?  20:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Get a life!!!!
The things WRITTEN on Drews page are actually FACTS. Sad you're such a brown noser.


 * Without sources to back up your claims, content of a defamatory nature cannot be added to a WP:BLP. Also you must write it in a manual of style appropriate for an encyclopedia. Now why you have a problem with me, I do not know. I am just an editor trying to keep this encyclopedia accurate and neutral.  Denied Club  ❯❯❯ talk?   02:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on LGBT rights in India. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I thought the exception to WP:3RR was obvious vandalism including page blanking. That is exactly what this user was doing and I attempted to open a dialogue, but this user didn't respond to any of my attempts. Why am I being warned? This was not an edit war, this was reverting clear page blanking.  Denied Club  ❯❯❯ talk?   23:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * At the time it looked to be and edit war. Of course the IP ended up blocked as a proxy. I've struck out the warning. Sorry about that. I also unprotected the page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Ah well I appreciate the quick strike out and no worries! I am sure you have more than enough on your plate being an administrator. I'm just glad I wasn't breaking any rules by reverting the blanking. Thanks for the response and hope you have a good week.  Denied Club  ❯❯❯ talk?   23:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Greetings. This is a heads up that two of the colors in your signature (as of this edit) have contrast-against-white ratios below the minimum 4.5:1 recommended in the footnote at WP:SIGAPP (a Wikipedia policy). The ratio for FF4500 is 3.44:1, and the ratio for 40E0D0 is 1.641:1.

Contrast is important for accessibility, which Wikipedia takes somewhat seriously. Can you change your signature to use compliant colors? If you are willing to limit your choices to named CSS colors, MOS:ONWHITE makes that easy; otherwise you have to do some experimenting with the contrast checker. Let me know if I can help.

It would also help if you would replace the sample signature you left at Signature tutorial in Nov 2017. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  04:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park notification
There are recently-posted discussions at WikiProject Amusement Parks you may be interested in contributing to, located here: WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

WikiProject Amusement Parks discussion
Hello ! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you. You are receiving this message as your username is listed on WikiProject Amusement Parks/Participants Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 02:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Parks reliable source discussion
Hi,. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Thank you!
 * Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Harobouri T • C (he/him) 16:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Billy Wayne Davis


A tag has been placed on Billy Wayne Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 24.183.96.14 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)