User talk:Denimadept/Archive 2

List of crossings of the Columbia River
I thought it looked a little sloppy with so much white space. But it's not a really big deal to me, go ahead and revert if you feel it's important. -Pete (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Turner Falls Road Bridge
I have nominated Turner Falls Road Bridge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Turner Falls Road Bridge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  RGTraynor  15:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Route 10 bridge
I just did a quick web search and added what I could find. The main sources are  and. I checked the NRHP and the MassHighway historic bridge list but the current Route 10 bridge is not listed. A more careful search might reveal a bit more online sources. For sure, there are sources not available online on this crossing as it seems to be tied to the town of Northfield's history. These bridges do appear to have much more information on them out there. It's just a matter of someone doing the research. Now all we need is to convince a few people that there are sources but the article just hasn't developed yet. --Polaron | Talk 20:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Historic Connecticut River Bridges

 * You might try something like:
 * Google site:memory.loc.gov +"spanning connecticut river"+bridge
 * which produces:


 * Bellows Falls Arch Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River, North Walpole, Cheshire County, NH ...
 * ... Bridge Street Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River on CT State Route 140, ...
 * Covered Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River, Montague City, Franklin County, MA ... Covered Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River, Orford, Grafton County, NH
 * Holyoke Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River, between Holyoke & South Hadley Falls, Holyoke, Hampden County, MA ...
 * Schell Memorial Bridge, Spanning Connecticut River on East Northfield Road, Northfield, Franklin County, MA ...
 * The (5) title indexes contain multiple crossings of the Connecticut river in the Library of Congress (most probably HABS/HAER/HALS). LeheckaG (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I added details to the (3) road bridges (mostly from the National Bridge Inventory).


 * Is it "Turner Falls" or "Turners Falls"?
 * Also National Bridge Inventory list (2)Greenfield-Montague (Connecticut River) crossings:

Place: Greenfield (Town of) Facility Carried: HWY MTGUE CTY RD Location: AT GRNFIELD-MONTAGUE T.L. Bridge Material and Design: Steel Truss - Thru Structure Length: 229.5 meters Year Built: 1947 NBI Structure Number: G12020134MHDNBI

Place: Greenfield (Town of) Facility Carried: HWY TRNRS FLS RD Location: 100' W OF CANAL-WHITE BR. Bridge Material and Design: Steel Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder Structure Length: 135.9 meters Year Built: 1936 NBI Structure Number: G1200212RMHDNBI LeheckaG (talk) 12:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Which Wiki articles go with which?


 * FYI - the "White Bridge" appears to be the shorter/smaller connecting bridge over the "canal".

LeheckaG (talk) 12:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The "White Bridge" is the shorter one, built after its predicessor was damaged or destroyed by the 1936 flood. The 1947 bridge is longer and in much worse condition.  Thanks!! - Denimadept (talk) 14:58, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree with your Canalside rail bridge update, I was misread the text in the article regarding the Warren and Whipple truss spans (which were original and which were replacements) when I counted them in the picture to clarify which were rebuilt or replaced as a result of the 1936 flood. LeheckaG (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you, you made me nervous. I was on and around the bridge to take pictures, and it seemed very clear that two of the spans had been replaced with heavier ones.  Once I saw the WGBY show about the flood, all became clear. - Denimadept (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Alcántara Bridge
Hello. I created List of Roman bridges. I can provide you the specific source (OConnor). Contact me by email. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That's an impressive list! - Denimadept (talk) 04:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thx. In case you are interested in the exact page numbers etc., contact me (you first have to activate your email account). Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Truss bridge reference discussion
Hello. Please review the discussion going on at Talk:Truss bridge. Input from members of WikiProject Bridges would be appreciated. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 04:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

GIS and Wiki
I am sorry that several crossings of the Connecticut River did not survive AFD. My personal interest is in getting otherwise difficult to find GIS or GIS-like information out to people in the form of Wiki tables or vector map layers (the Location map+,map~ and BS route map templates). Wiki has developed some nice tools in the general area. Personally I feel that there should be an option of either consolidation or moving content rather than deletion. After an AFD, is it possible to request a temporary restore so that content which was otherwise deleted can be added to other relevant articles? LeheckaG (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, there is still life in the deletion review for Turners Falls Road Bridge and the other articles. I have learned that we need to develop a better notability criteria for Wikpedia:WikiProject Bridges. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 03:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * At least we tried. I was really hoping to get copies before they were deleted, but I didn't.  I have copies from when I created them, but that's not quite the same. - Denimadept (talk) 05:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * - it is my understanding they copy them to your User: space as sub-pages? Why was my page deleted? has:
 * List of wikis
 * Alternative outlets
 * WikiIndex.Com

LeheckaG (talk) 10:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I don't see an alternate site other than Structurae, and that's kinda difficult for just anyone to edit. We could create a new wiki with a similar aim which is NOT an encyclopedia and which is more useful.  This wiki would include transient data including current (re)construction info as well as the basic statistics and history.  It would specifically be aimed at ALL crossings, structures, whatever, past, current, and future, as well as proposed projects.  What do you figure? If I understand correctly, getting the wiki software set up and available wouldn't be too tough. - Denimadept (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

date autoformatting
Hi, you said at Macintosh talk that you didn't understand the issue: it's just the turning of all those square-bracketed dates (blue in display) into plain text: only Wikipedians who've chosen a date preference and logged in see their chosen format anyway. Do you want me to try it on that article (it's optional)? Talk:Macintosh Tony   (talk)  08:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, so it's a Preferences issue! I didn't know that. - Denimadept (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, so for the purposes of the survey of users' attitudes, do you feel positive, negative, or uncommitted about the proposal to free the article of date autoformatting? I happen to have comparisons handy from a Featured List. You may wish to compare the previous autoformatted version with the cleaned-up version. Scrolling down side by side is best, but the difference is clear by comparing one after the other, too. Tony   (talk)  06:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Zakim Bridge
As a life-long resident of Massachusetts whose grandfather personally knew the Yawkeys (Have you not heard of them?), whose mother was at game 5 in 1975 (Have you not heard of that one?) and game 2 in 2004 (Have you not heard who one that one?) and who personally has been to at least one Yankees-Red Sox (Have you not heard of that rivalry?) game for the past ten years, I can categorically say that there is absolutely no pertinence to the Bill Buckner reference. The bridge wasn't even under construction in 1986, and the man has no relationship to it.

Have you not heard of WP:Trivia?

BTW, take a look at the image of the dedication plaque. Have you not heard seen who took it?

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 20:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Have you not heard of snarky sarcasm? 8-P --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 20:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Ponte Vecchio
I you make another graceless edit like that I'll have to report you. I do not indulge in edit wars. What responsible objection can be made to this less-aggressive display of disinfoboxes need not be made to me, but to the larger community. -Wetman (talk) 22:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do. I'm already looking into it myself.  Apparently, the Wikiqutte procedure didn't work, so we'll move on to the next step. - Denimadept (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Please see the conclusion reached by Quiddity in response to the discussion at WP:VPR sparked by this debate. I defer to you regarding his suggestion that the infobox at Ponte Vecchio be removed entirely until resolution of the conflict. I started a proposal that no infoboxes be hidden, you may have thought that out and wish to comment here. Sswonk (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I have archived the discussion at MoS. The experiment at Ponte Vecchio will continue and no further discussion about a blanket statement against hiding infoboxes appears necessary. The discourse bore fruit in that major concerns about functionality and innovation were aired and a cooperative atmosphere prevailed. Sswonk (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC) -08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Religion
so you wish to insult my religion do you. i am one of the 8 elders so you need to whach what you say Denimadept.mindoshawn
 * Wow, you sure act sensitive. Not my problem, thankfully.  You asked a question and I answered it.  Too bad you can't handle that.  Do yourself a favor and don't ask questions you can't handle the answers to. - Denimadept (talk) 18:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The 8 Alimbic elders are apparently characters in Metroid Prime Hunters. I wonder what they make of my username. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

so what you pile of ithrak crap.i am a alimbic elder of the real alimbic fiath and i do not like your way of talking to me i named it the alimbic faith because iam also a hunters fan .i will tell the other followers of the alimbic faith about your actions,.and what is this about me not being able to handle questions, you must be out of your mind oh also when you insult me or my faith you insult God himself.mindoshawn- --71.30.71.243 (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's hard to keep up with your Metroid/Alimbic vocabulary. Thank God (or the Alimbic elders?) for Google. Am I a Greater Ithrak or a Lesser Ithrak? Can it please be greater? PrimeHunter (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

fine greater ithrak,i will for give you for your apparent lack of respect for other faiths, and its thank the over Elder- thats God--Mindoshawn (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)mindoshawn means light warrior.iam elder of the maranshawn .it means blood wariors.


 * You're welcome to stop commenting here, Mindoshawn. Further additions by you will be removed without further comment. - Denimadept (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

integra/rsx
I welcome your edits on the integra/rsx article, but obviously I disagree with you. instead of starting some silly edit war, I thought it would be a good idea to explain why I moved the article and see what your opinion is.

I based my edits on the fact that cars such as the Honda NSX have articles refering to them using the original name, not the Acura brand. A car such as the Lexus IS/Toyota Altezza has the name Lexus IS due to the fact that after Toyota Japan stopped using the Altezza name, they started using the Lexus name in Japan.

If the car was only called an Integra in Japan, I might agree with you - but the name RSX is only used in US, Canada and Hong Kong - the rest of the world uses the name Integra.

Sennen goroshi (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

SPAM
My edits to the Monty Python spam article were based in the Wikipedia article on Spam. Could you explain why my edit seems to be not only wrong, but specifically "vandalism"? The term spam didn't directly become in use as a reference on Monty Python, but as a reference to internet forum users filling forums with the word "spam" (inspired by Monty Python). My source is the Wikipedia article on internet spam. Please explain why you reverted my edit.

189.146.5.42 (talk) 02:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Uhoh. Okay, I screwed up.  I'll put it back. - Denimadept (talk) 05:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, no prob! 189.146.5.42 (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, no worries
I'm not made of glass ;-) No apology necessary. Cheers,--Goodmorningworld (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: My last warning
I see you recently gave me a last warning after I redirected Boundin' to sheep. I apologise for that if it was wrong; but whats all this on my talk page about being blocked in october and me saying quickest block or something? Have I been hacked? --80.44.254.155 (talk) 15:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * LOL - Denimadept (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Make Love, Not Warcraft
Eh, technically any act of vandalism could be a "difference of opinion" if the vandal thinks what he's doing is right... ;) Still, as I explained to Rubywine, it's not just the way they removed it, but how they did it. They seemed to be making a point and to me that looked like vandalism. I didn't leave them a canned vandalism warning either, but explained why I did what I did. But I could have been wrong too. If they want to remove it again, I hope they'll take it to the talk page as I suggested. --  At am a chat 00:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

List of crossings of the Ohio River
Dear sir, I would say that my edit was in fact constructive. For the Daniel Carter Beard Bridge, to which I added the fact that it is very commonly referred to as the "Big Mac Bridge". As explained in its own article and can be seen in this local newspaper article: http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2001/05/15/loc_big_mac_bridge.html. All of which could have been found by a cursory search or either Wikipedia or Google. If your comments dealt with the formatting or appropriateness of the info for that particular article. Then please also adjust the info for Newport Southbank Bridge (The Purple People Bridge), which can be found directly above the Daniel Carter Beard Bridge. Or the other bridges listed with their nicknames. It was from these that I stole the formatting and the justification. I would prefer that before labeling someone with the id of vandal that you at least pay some heed to the context of their edit. It is rather off putting to be called a vandal when making such a simple edit and to my mind obvious edit. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.86.205 (talk) 14:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Big Mac is the Mackinac Bridge in Michigan. You may be somewhat confused. - Denimadept (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You are quite correct that the Mackinac Bridge is called "the Big Mac", a bridge a I have crossed many times in the last year in fact, but if you read the article from the Cincinnati Newspaper you will clearly see the the Daniel Carter Beard Bridge is also refered to as the "the Big Mac". In fact if you simply Google "Big Mac Bridge" http://www.google.com/search?q=%22big+mac+bridge%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a you will see that of the first ten links listed two are for the Mackinac and eight are for Dan Beard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.86.205 (talk) 01:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd like to say that the people in the Cinci area are all wrong, but I can't quite do it. - Denimadept (talk) 01:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)