User talk:Denis.arnaud/Archive 3

Travix
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Travix, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.globrands.com/en/cases/travix-2/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Travix


A tag has been placed on Travix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.globrands.com/en/cases/travix-2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harry Let us have speaks  14:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Travix


A tag has been placed on Travix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.globrands.com/en/cases/travix-2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harry Let us have speaks  15:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Harry Let us have speaks  15:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Travix. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Harry Let us have speaks  15:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Fine. Sorry for the removal of the deletion tag. I have just re-worded the whole text so that it differs (hopefully enough) from the Travix web site. The speedy deletion was too fast and did not allow me to re-word the page before it got deleted... -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Copyvios are tagged as soon as they are noticed. You need to find reliable sources and then start the article again from scratch, not based on wording from the company's website. It is best if you plan to develop the article over time to start it in your sandbox and then move it to mainspace when it is ready. Harry Let us have speaks  15:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, fair enough. How should we proceed with that one (Travix), now that I have slightly re-written it? -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There is still a substantial amount from the company website - and no reliable sources. I would say move what you have written to your sandbox, find some reliable sources and rewrite based on those. Then recreate the article once it is properly sourced. Harry Let us have speaks  15:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * As a matter of fact, the Dutch Wikipedia had a page for Travix International B.V.. I re-started from that Dutch article, and had the Travix page redirected to that new one. Is that fine like that? -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Still no reliable sources. Harry Let us have speaks  15:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * What other (reliable) source may we refer to than the official Web site of the company? I check on Google, and the only sources popping up are the official pages on various sites (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter). -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The website of the company is not a reliable source. It is a primary source that can be used for some things but you cannot base an article on it. Please read about what is a reliable source and what gives a company notability. Harry Let us have speaks  16:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Logitravel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logitravel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Logitravel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logitravel.com Logo 2015.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logitravel.com Logo 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camp Garcia Vieques


The article Camp Garcia Vieques has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very little content on an unnotable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The coordinates, the name and the type of the airport are already good to know, and make it searchable throughout Wikipedia (and, consequently, through many search engines). It is useful for users interested in aviation/airports. Having an existing page encourages further improvement. Where as, if the page does not exist, the ticket to entry for potential contributors (for instance, with a photo of the place) is greater. -- Denis.arnaud (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  05:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Air Leisure Egypt Logo 2015 07.png
--Krdbot 23:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Air Leisure Egypt Airbus A340 2015.png
--Krdbot 01:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Fly Blue Crane Logo.jpg
--Krdbot 23:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fly Blue Crane Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fly Blue Crane Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

File:AB Aviation Logo.jpg
--Krdbot 00:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4, 2015
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AB Aviation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pemba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)