User talk:DenisBoshnakovich

Nomination of Ramzi Toure Idrissou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramzi Toure Idrissou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ramzi Toure Idrissou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramzi Toure Idrissou (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramzi Toure Idrissou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Ramzi_Toure_Idrissou Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ramzi_Toure_Idrissou reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello there, I think you make a big mistake for the publication, I think you have to review again the article, I edited it and made it simplier with reliable sources and I hope this message will be read by you and I believe you will change your opinion for the article DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, DenisBoshnakovich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ramzi Toure Idrissou, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！  ) 05:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Ramzi Toure Idrissou, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello DenisBoshnakovich. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ramzi Toure Idrissou, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DenisBoshnakovich. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. It's clear that you are affiliated with this person from your comments at Articles for deletion/Ramzi Toure Idrissou Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not paid for the cration of the article
 * I think you have to review again my article and to accept it as a regular article because I think your information is very old for the message I received above my article so you have not to delete my article but you have to accept it as a regular and it is not paid for me to write the article, the footballer I am writing this article for is my friend and he pays me nothing to write for him an article DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As per the below warning, you should not be writing about your friends here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No no, I mean we are just acquaintances and I am using the rule of neutral point of view so there has to be no problem DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 06:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, DenisBoshnakovich. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ramzi Toure Idrissou, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Acceptance of consensus
Clearly your only purpose here is to publicise one person. A discussion has resulted in a consensus that there is not enough evidence of notability of that person to justify having an article about him. You have persistently worked to prevent implementation of that consensus, by means such as repeatedly removing an "Articles for deletion" notice, and recreating the article. Wikipedia works by collaboration. When editors disagree, we discuss the issues involved, with a few to trying to reach agreement. If such a discussion results in agreement among almost all editors concerned, then we accept that decision. If an individual editor decides to ignore what everyone else thinks, and persist in trying to unilaterally impose their own preference, that is considered to be unconstructive. You are very welcome to decide to accept that the one article you have tried to create is not going to exist, and move on to contributing to Wikipedia in other ways, if you like. Alternatively, if you have no interest in contributing in other ways, then you may decide to accept that the one article you have tried to create is not going to exist, and leave Wikipedia. I can understand that doing either of those must be very disappointing for you, after the work you have put into trying to create the article, but unfortunately those are the options. If you persist in trying to overturn the outcome of clear consensus in a discussion, thenit is likely that an administrator will block you from editing. JBW (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


 * No my purpose here is to start publicate articles, no matter for what, I think you make a big mistake for deleting my page, you don't find any reasons now to delete my article and you delete it because I posted it, that is all. I have the right to ask why the page is removed now??? I now have some reliable resource and external link and you just decide to delete my page. You have no right to delete it with no reason DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This is my first article for Wikipedia, please do not let me down and do not let down my motivation to write articles DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


 * OK, I will try to help you by explaining a few points which may be helpful to you in getting established as a Wikipedia editor.


 * I certainly don't wish to destroy your motivation to write articles. However, unfortunately creating new articles is probably the most difficult aspect of contributing to Wikipedia for a new editor, because understanding how to do so comes only with experience. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.


 * The reason why your repeated attempts to create an article about Ramzi Toure Idrissou have been deleted is that, as you know, a discussion took place in which there was a clear consensus that it isn't suitable for Wikipedia. Personally, I would be perfectly happy for it to be an article, but my task as an administrator is to make sure that the consensus in that discussion is honoured, not to impose my own preference. I have been a Wikipedia editor for 13 years, in which time I have many, many times had to accept consensus when I have personally thought that the consensus was wrong. That is how Wikipedia works, and only if you too can accept consensus whether you agree with it or not will you have a successful time here. If you are not willing to do things that way, then you may be happier if you go instead to one of the many web sites where you are free to post things of your own choosing, and don't have to consider other people's opinions. I have already given you my advice that creating new articles is not the best way to start, but if you decide not to take that advice, and to go ahead with creating an article, then choose a different subject to write an article about, because if you again try to recreate a page which you know has been the subject of a consensus to delete, then it is very likely that an administrator will very soon block you from editing.


 * There is also another problem which I don't think has yet been mentioned to you, but which you need to know about. You have sometimes created a page, moved it to a different title, then moved it again to another title, then again to yet another title... I don't know why you have done that, but there are at least two reasons why it will be much better if you don't do that again. Firstly, you may be unintentionally making it very difficult for other editors to keep track of the history of the page, which obviously you won't wish to do. Secondly, there's a risk that some editors may think that it is not unintentional, and that you are doing it deliberately in order to make it difficult for other editors to keep track of the history. If you are not sure what title a page should have, then asking for advice from a more experienced editor is a better approach than moving it repeatedly to a string of different titles.


 * I have put some time and thought into writing this message, in the hope that it may be helpful to you, but if you need any clarification of any part of what I have said then please feel very welcome to ask me. JBW (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see, but I need to know if there are mistakes of the article as an article, I understood this moving is against the rules, I edited the sources and references. Thanks for the feedback DenisBoshnakovich (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ramzi Toure Idrissou


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ramzi Toure Idrissou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 16:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of a month for persistently defying consensus by repeatedly re-creating a deleted page. Considering your other disruptive editing, the fact that you are editing contrary to the conflict of interest guideline, and the fact that you have done no other, constructive, editing at all, you might well have been blocked indefinitely. If you decide to come back to editing after the block is over, then you need to take all those points into consideration. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. JBW (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)