User talk:Denis tarasov

Latvijas Mobilais Telefons
Thank you for your work on the article about LMT. There is a Latvian Wikipedia to which you might want to contribute as well. You might want to visit http://lt.wikipedia.org/ You could start writing an article in Latvian about LMT at http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvijas_Mobilais_Telefons --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

digital terrestrial technologies in Europe
Hello. I noticed you created MVDS. Perhaps you have some knowledge about MVDDS technology? There has been a huge dispute between the firms MDS America and MDS International that has been playing out on Wikipedia. You can read about it at WP:COIN under the heading MDS International. Thanks, nadav 06:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Lomonosov
I noticed that you are translating Le Sage's theory of gravitation into russian: Теория гравитации Лесажа. One question: Do you know something on the theory of Mikhail Lomonosov? According to Radzievskii he had developed a very similar mode like Fatio and Le Sage. Have you some information, which might be included in the article? Thanks. --D.H 14:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

No, i don't know about Lomonosov theory now, but I plan to find Russian original of his work. Lomonosov is very popular scintist in Russia and a lot of his papers available on internet. If I'll find something, I'll add to english version of article too.


 * Hi. I found a paper of Lomonosov in Englisch. See . It's interesting that Lomonosov's theory ist not a Le Sage type model, so I've included a description of Lomonosov's theory in the article mechanical explanations of gravitation and not in Le Sage's theory of gravitation. --D.H 21:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on SAF Tehnika, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Dynaflow  babble  09:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ONE logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:ONE logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rebir logo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rebir logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Anthem of Liepāja
I see that you have uploaded file which I believe is copyrighted song not as short as its supposed to be - you should use 30 seconds long clip of it, also you haven't provided fair use rationale (like filing out this). Just so you know, what you should do becuase Wikipedia is very careful with copyrights, if you don't know how ask me - I'll do it for you Xil ... sist!  18:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

No need to be rude
Sorry about the edit. Obviously not familiar with the actual village otherwise I wouldn't have changed it. Just trying to clear a few English mistakes - of which there are many - but I didn't mean to imply that you didn't know Russian better than I did. It was an honest mistake and since I didn't know you were the author of the page, it's not exactly fair to suggest I was trying to get one up on you. Lstanley1979 (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Zemessarde emblem.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zemessarde emblem.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Fractal cosmology
Two comments, Denis: 1) I am not "the editor".  There is no "the editor", there are many editors working by  consensus; you are one of them and your (many) contributions are as welcome as mine.   Please note that I initiated the deletion discussion, but it proceeded because many established editors (all strangers to me, this isn't insiders-vs-outsiders) preferred to delete it.  2) Fractal Cosmology is not "your article"; all articles are owned by everyone. If you want an article which is yours and yours alone, that's what web pages are for. Bm gub (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

See my talk page for followup. Bm gub (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Kara-murza1997.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kara-murza1997.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 15:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

čekeme avīze
Can you tell me why you are deleting the link?

I dont see why this paper cant be here to show what the city has... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.82.166.151 (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Because Cekeme is the advertisement newspaper, without any neutral content... Wikipedia isn't place for advertisement.

Your GA nomination of 2006 Riga summit
The article 2006 Riga summit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:2006 Riga summit for things needed to be addressed. Million_Moments (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Web notability
Web sites need to have independent evidence/sources that the website itself is notable, not simply existing. You may believe the project is a notable (or interesting) idea but the article as it existed did not pass WP:WEB. –– Lid(Talk) 11:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Auseklis etc.
It is not main symbol of Latvia it is symbol of national awakening if anything and as such it shouldn't be top - only things witout which a country would be unimaginable (such symbols as flag or coat of arms) are that important. And mythology is not a topic of general interest - we have a project on Latvia not on Latvian mythology, please chang it to something lower Xil   *  14:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:COMPUTING Invitation
I have noticed that you are already a member of a related project and thought you might be interested in this wikiproject also and hence leaving this note ... - From the outreach dept

Intergrated banner for WikiProject Computer networking
I have made a proposal for a intergrated banner for the project  here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks --  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Liepaajas Himna - Pilseetaa kuraa piedzimst veejsh.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:Liepaajas Himna - Pilseetaa kuraa piedzimst veejsh.ogg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nera logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nera logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Why?
Why are you adding this material without citing its relevance to aphrodisiacs. Wikipedia is not for an indiscriminate collection of information. Also you have many personal photos on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a blog / webspace provider. One or two photos is fine but 5-6? That's getting abusive. 82.231.221.245 (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Why not? All these "substances" are aphrodisiacs and anti-wormal and antifungal btw too. So leave it plz in the article. About photos, it's my personal page, not the encyclopedic article; it's the right place for the photos. You can, also register and create your own personal page, don't be too anonymous. Go, watch the TV. Denis Tarasov (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You've got ZERO references and as well you're talking about "antiseptic" which is completely unrelated to the article. 82.231.221.245 (talk) 20:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

User Page Images
You have 5 personal images. Wikipedia's User Page Guideline page specifies the allowance of a, tasteful personal photograph or two . Your usage amounts to essentially a web page about you, which is wrong. I would suggest you nominate 3 of these for deletion (ie: Dog v. God.jpg, etc.) 82.231.221.245 (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Aphrodisiac
Hi Denis tarasov, my cleaning up of the aphrodisiac article was not vandalism, I simply reinstated the last good version and added back the very few good edits since then. Somebody who is not me has undone your reversion and your edits to the article 1. Cacycle (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fractal cosmology
I have nominated Fractal cosmology, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Fractal cosmology. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

File:GreatCourlandBayMonument.jpg
Hello Denis!

Did you take this photo? If yes, can you upload it in a higher resoluted version? Greets, High Contrast (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:LiepajaKarostaP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LiepajaKarostaP.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Liepaja lost most.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Liepaja lost most.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Doma ērģeles
I presume, you are not that interested in discussions. As you can see here, I suggested that the Doma ērģeles article be merged with the Riga Cathedral article. Do you find it constructive to ignore other editors and just go ahead with your own ideas? Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 16:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Do not shoot at white swans (film)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Do not shoot at white swans (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Movie with no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Uldis Sesks
Hello. Would You be so kind and agree to copy the image of Mr Sesks to the Commons? Best regards, Warschauer [Polish Wikipedia] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.172.67 (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ONE screen.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ONE screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Damochka1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Damochka1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 11:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

As one genius to another.....
....being interested in this base 16 stuff, I looked at your user page. Well, there you are on one hand saying that the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42, and on the other hand, you go telling everybody that you have an IQ of 142! What's the matter with you? You need to simply drop the 100 and stick to the 42, otherwise the "everything" answer doesn't equate! Jeez, you've gotta be smarter than that! ;-) Amandajm (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, stop bothering me! Denis Tarasov (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Viesturs Kālinieks
A tag has been placed on Viesturs Kālinieks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Viesturs Kālinieks, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 14:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Viesturs Kālinieks. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Viesturs Kālinieks
A tag has been placed on Viesturs Kālinieks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  elektrik SHOOS  10:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Elvis Bergs
An article that you have been involved in editing, Elvis Bergs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Renata (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sincretics


The article Sincretics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article about what appears to be a New Age concept. Nothing much on Google. Fails WP:RS, WP:FRINGE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 23:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Persons
Hello Denis tarasov. Just notifying you about the AfD on Persons. People are having trouble finding info to verify the content so your participation would be welcome. Christopher Connor (talk) 13:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Sincretics for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Sincretics, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sincretics until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Image nominated for deletion
Hi! I just wanted to inform you of Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liepajas SEZ karte web versija.jpg. Perhaps you can help us? --MGA73 (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Slavutich map legend
Could you post/send me/give me a link to the legend (numbers) on the Slavutich map? 188.146.26.88 (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC) (bwucke (at) gmail.com)

File:Gagarin liepaja.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gagarin liepaja.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  00:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gunita Kudrjavceva


A tag has been placed on Gunita Kudrjavceva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Deadly&forall;ssassin 08:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Deadly&forall;ssassin 08:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Aerodium Latvia
Hello Denis tarasov. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aerodium Latvia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Madara Cosmetics
Hello Denis tarasov. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Madara Cosmetics, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File:BarcodePassportLVKrievs.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BarcodePassportLVKrievs.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FCatom.PNG


A tag has been placed on File:FCatom.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajastramvajs all lines.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajastramvajs all lines.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've changed the tag to "no permission", see discussion at Commons:User talk:Bürgerentscheid. To prove that you have permission to publish the image under the specified licence, please follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Damochka1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Damochka1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Liepaja lost most.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Liepaja lost most.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LiepajaKarostaP.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LiepajaKarostaP.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:A Dinbergs.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:A Dinbergs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:TankerSudmalis.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TankerSudmalis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:TeodorsEnins3stars.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TeodorsEnins3stars.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajasezers.png
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajasezers.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:MirdzaKempe2.jpg.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MirdzaKempe2.jpg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SkedeMemorial.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SkedeMemorial.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SudmalisImants2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SudmalisImants2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepaja1940.png
Thank you for uploading File:Liepaja1940.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SudmalisImants.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SudmalisImants.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajastramvajs 132 1968.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajastramvajs 132 1968.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajastramvajs 19.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajastramvajs 19.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajastramvajs 156 1979.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajastramvajs 156 1979.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Liepajastramvajs 141 1968.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Liepajastramvajs 141 1968.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Aglona basilica.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aglona basilica.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kara-murza1997.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kara-murza1997.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Latgyprogorstroy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Latgyprogorstroy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lb1976.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lb1976.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VilnisBulavsYoungGirl.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VilnisBulavsYoungGirl.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ViktorKravchuk1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ViktorKravchuk1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AivarsKleinsMilch-cow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AivarsKleinsMilch-cow.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AldisKlavins1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AldisKlavins1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RobertsStarastsPleneraa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RobertsStarastsPleneraa.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Annuss1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Annuss1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Latvian grid.png
Thank you for uploading File:Latvian grid.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:DenisTarasov5y.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DenisTarasov5y.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

File:DenisTarasov1stGrade.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DenisTarasov1stGrade.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

File:TigersNess.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:TigersNess.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Santa Monica Internet Local Exchange


A tag has been placed on Santa Monica Internet Local Exchange requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:NESS250679.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NESS250679.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

File:NESS260679.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NESS260679.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:17, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Liepāja International Airport page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590493935 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) and a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%0A%0A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Fdiff%3D590493935%20Liepāja International Airport%5D Ask for help])

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607379780 your edit] to Šķēde may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The main perpetrators were detachments of the Einsatzgruppen, the Sicherheitsdienst or SD, the Ordnungspolizei and Latvian auxiliary police and militia forces. Wehrmacht and German naval

Dab pages
I've reverted you - see MOS:DABINT. Hope you don't mind. Dougweller (talk) 16:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Splenogonadal fusion
I left a note at Talk:Splenogonadal fusion regarding the tag issue. Thanks! EricEnfermero (Talk) 18:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2018
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Alexander Zakharchenko, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alexander Zakharchenko without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riga Metro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vestibule ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Riga_Metro check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Riga_Metro?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Austria. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

To reiterate what I already pointed out in edit summaries:
 * 1) The claim that "Bavarian" has any kind of special status or legal recognition that other forms of German spoken in Austria have not is wrong; I have already cited (and quoted from) the relevant statute. Austrian language law does not privilege Bavarian dialects spoken in Austria relative to e.g. Alemannic dialects of German spoken in Austria. Neither the B-VG nor any other relevant statutes even mention Bavarian. If you think I am misreading the law, please explain why. Cite a source.
 * 2) The specific way you talk about "Bavarian Austrian" makes it sound like "Austrian" is a clade in the linguistic taxonomy tree and "Bavarian Austrian" is one of its subclades. If anything, it's the other way around: the set of Bavarian dialects spoken in Austria is a subset of the set of Bavarian dialects in general. If you think the linguistic community is wrong and your own classification is better, please explain why. Cite a source.
 * 3) Your edit to the sentence in the body text makes the sentence ungrammatical. Kramler (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Demographics of Austria. According to the 2001 population census, 88.6% are native German speakers (96% Austro-Bavarian dialects and 4% Alemanic dialects) while the remaining 11.4% speak several minority languages. The non-German speakers of Austria can be divided into two groups: traditional minorities, who are related to territories formerly part of the Habsburg Monarchy, and new minorities, resulting from recent immigration. Probably written with error - Germanic languages, in the country we use precise language and precise name - in this case it's Bavarian Austrian. It is independent language. Read Bavarian Wikipedia - http://bar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96stareich chapter Sprochn & autochtone Voiksgruppm

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donbass status referendums, 2014. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 05:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC) You lie, I checked source, in the law written "may", and don't use criminal term separatist.Denis Tarasov (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Administrative Forms Registration and Review Center
Please don't do this again, please see WP:TRANSLATION for the correct procedure if you're unable to translate something properly. A machine translation should never be used to directly create an article, they are too unreliable and they should only ever be a starting point to develop a good article. What you've done, just copy & pasting the article including all the Wiki text is even worse than posting a bad translation, I hope you're intending to actually develop this article into something better.-- Jac 16888 Talk 22:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:MirdzaKempe1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MirdzaKempe1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

"Rutsov" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rutsov. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your last edit at South Kurzeme Municipality
Could you please clarify what you meant by "invalid"? It's difficult for me to address your objection when you don't elaborate. I've assumed it relates to the choice of a photo of a church, so I've replaced it with something else. Please let me know if you're OK with this. Cobblet (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Now much better. And text is clear Denis Tarasov (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Would you please immediately stop move warring, otherwise your account will be blocked from editing. Thank you for your understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Law of Belgium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:DenisTarasovLebedevka1991.png


The file File:DenisTarasovLebedevka1991.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused personal photo"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ness balls.jpg


The file File:Ness balls.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Liepāja. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. A broken file link is not "true information". Sumanuil.  (talk to me) 22:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't use misleading edit summaries, so no need to lie. And explain why you reverted my edits, I'm the author of this article, -, there is no 1. Livonian language. 2. Correct link for Liepāja Party is Liepāja Party, correct Latvian and Russian name till 1918 was Libava. So I think you are wrong. Denis Tarasov (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm not the one pretending languages don't exist, those are both redlinks, and no one owns an article. Sumanuil.  (talk to me) 23:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Your reply is not logical and wrong. Denis Tarasov (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

File:DenisTarasovLebedevka1991.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DenisTarasovLebedevka1991.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

User warning placement
Hi there, just a quick note that user warnings should be placed on the user's talk page, not their userpage (as you have done here). Also please remember to substitute these templates. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Soviet cuisine
That said, the text I removed sat there unreferenced for many years. Some of it was dubious, by the way. - Altenmann >talk 19:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Please learn what in wikipedia is called WP:VANDALISM
 * 2) Please look at edit summaries of edits before revert
 * 3) Per wikipedia rules, unsourced text may be removed at an time and you cannot restore it without providing references.

Warning about baseless accusations of vandalism
Hi Denis tarasov, I'm DanCherek and I am an administrator here at the English Wikipedia. I noticed that you have accused several editors of engaging in vandalism [1][2][3][4][5], when they have done nothing of the Vandalism has a very specific meaning here – it is editing (or other behavior) – and it does not apply to good-faith edits that you simply disagree with. False accusations of vandalism are disruptive and may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away good-faith editors. Please read our policy on vandalism in its entirety, including the "What is not vandalism" section. This is a warning to desist from further behavior of this kind. While I'm here, I am also going to alert you that you are currently edit-warring at Soviet cuisine; see below for more information. DanCherek (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yersinia (computing)


The article Yersinia (computing) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet notability guidelines for software, unsourced since 2008."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)