User talk:DennisGroves

Have a chat with me! Welcome!

Hello, DennisGroves, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was OWASP, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Widefox ; talk 10:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page at User:DennisGroves may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as, which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add db-userreq to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. ''Hi Dennis, I'm not sure if your account is still active, there's another template that you may wish to put on the page to make it look less like an bio and article. '' Widefox ; talk 15:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I am not clear what part of my biography constitutes as a violation of your guidelines? And why is this only a problem 9 months later? DennisGroves (talk)

I just removed everything; it is simpler this way. It is fair enough that the bio I use on OWASP is not a bio for use on wikipedia since it is not relevant to my association with wikipedia. I have no interest in wikipedia other than removing plagiarized statements likely created in ignorance of the facts. DennisGroves (talk)


 * Hi Dennis, unfortunately the template above wasn't too helpful..WP:USERBIO and WP:UP are where I considered that userpage slightly crossed the line - so my concern was all of it really. Please do say if you don't agree, as I'm just one normal editor like yourself. Not a problem now you've blanked it, but you needn't go that far....

COI
(Here's a quick guide WP:PLAINANDSIMPLECOI) ...In fact, (now this is where it might sound silly)...as you have a connection with OWASP per WP:COI, you are encouraged to disclose that COI "on their user pages and on the talk page of the article" -WP:COI - as you had done, just a bit too successfully!. The same for User:Samantha Groves, as you can for yourself check this edit against that guide and draw your own conclusion. Just to be clear, I *do* encourage you to edit any article bearing in mind the COI guidelines, there's no problem with any of your edits, thanks for some sources, and the kind apology accepted. Widefox ; talk 17:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)