User talk:Dennis Wagle

November 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kangchenjunga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 10:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kangchenjunga, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kangchenjunga. - Arjayay (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)