User talk:Dennis the mennis

Removal of content in July 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quail
Hello. I saw you've added quail to the list in Poultry article. It's good point in my opinnion. But if I could I want to ask if you maybe know any other picture of that bird which can be changed instead of the current one. Maybe we could add a better one. Thanks :) 89.69.78.126 (talk) 01:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wild yak (November 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wild yak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw   Talk   13:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dennis the mennis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Donkey articles
Hi! It's great to see someone else take some interest in donkey articles, thank you! I've undone your moves of three pages. Here's why: unfortunately, article titling of animal breed articles has become a rather contentious area, so it's often best to propose a change on the talk-page rather than just assume it's going to be unopposed. You couldn't have been expected to know that the horse WikiProject has a sort of unwritten rule of thumb: "if the breed name needs the word 'horse' and can't stand alone, then 'horse' is capitalised". This isn't written anywhere that I know of, has never been discussed that I'm aware of, and I don't agree with it; but I try to stick to it anyway. You obviously can't say "he's riding a Provence" in the way that you can say "he's riding a Zamorano-Leonés", so – under the "rule" – we should capitalise "donkey". If you want to discuss this, I suggest WT:EQUINE as the best place.

I've noticed that you've added a lot of images to the List of donkey breeds. That's great … but can I ask if in every case you're sure that the image really represents that particular breed, rather than some generic animal that happens to be in that area? I haven't looked closely myself, so I'm asking you. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Remember the references!
Hello. Many of your articles seem to be missing references, so I wanted to remind you to include references when creating articles. Ethanlu121 (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Norwegian red deer
I'm disappointed you ignored 's message above and have continued to create unreferenced articles. The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to do so. If you can't be bothered, please don't create articles. Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * And the same on North African boar and Mediterranean boar. Please don't create further articles until you are willing to add references, it creates a lot fo work for others. Boleyn (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Central Asian boar
Hi, I'm Zakhx150. Dennis the mennis, thanks for creating Central Asian boar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've just tagged this page with a 'no references' flag. It look like you've been adding lots of content recently to articles on Mammals, which is great. It's be very helpful to Wikipedia if you are able to add in-line references to ensure that the information is accurate and verifiable. There is a useful beginner's guide HERE if you are unsure about it. Happy editing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Zakhx150 (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Central Asian boar
 * added a link pointing to Groves


 * List of water buffalo breeds
 * added a link pointing to Komodo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North African boar


The article North African boar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I could find no sources to confirm this is a subspecies."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norwegian red deer


The article Norwegian red deer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I couldn't confirm info here; creator has created several dubious unref sub-stubs and hasn't addressed the issues after msgs. Can't WP:VERIFY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Warning
If you create further unreferenced articles with little information, they will be moved to draftspace. This is making a huge amount of work for others. Boleyn (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Corsico-Sardinian wild pig for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corsico-Sardinian wild pig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Corsico-Sardinian wild pig until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of North African boar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North African boar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/North African boar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Central Asian boar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Asian boar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Central Asian boar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles created
Hi, Dennis, sorry for not sending you this message last night but I'm just finishing reviewing your articles, which I came across while working on New Page Patrol. Another editor (Ethanlu121) sent you a message asking you to stop creating unreferenced articles in February; you did not respond (WP:CIR) and continued creating unreferenced articles. On 6th March, you received another message about creating an unreferenced article from Zakhx150, which you also did not respond to and did not go back and add your source to the article. I then sent you a message in mid-July again asking you to stop; you did not respond, so I don't know if you have stopped this or just happen to have not created any articles in the last month. It is frustrating that when editors take the time to contact you, you ignore them - it looks like you have never responded to anyone on your talk page.

While reviewing your creations, I saw other editors concerned that the breeds you had created articles on were not breeds at all (specifically Miniature Mediterranean donkey). I found it difficult with some of them, because some names, e.g. Chinese buffalo, came up on a search, but seemed to be about buffalo in China, and not about a specific species or subspecies. There was no information (and what there was, wasn't verified) to indicate it was any different from the beasts discussed in the article we already had, Water buffalo. I had spent several hours looking at these, and others have worked hard on them too. It would have been so much easier if you had given your source (I'm sure you had one) when you created the articles, this has caused a lot of work for others. You can see your list of creations at: so you can see what edits have been made to the articles you created, and hopefully you will be able to help clear these up. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Unless there are more domestic Accipitriformes birds, could you remove the taxon group?
The reason we have the "other" categories for the taxon groups on the Domesticated Animals list is so that animals that don't fit into a taxon group with several other species don't have one all by their lonesome. You'll note, if you sort by taxon, that the only taxon group (besides the one you added) which only has one member is "other amphibians", and that will change if someone adds any other common amphibian pets that aren't frogs.

I do appreciate your work on the Domestic Animals list, however. Tamtrible (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

List of extinct animals of the British Isles
This list is about post glacial and post creation of the English Channel extinctions, not Pleistoscene or earlier extinctions, so probably cuts off at c.10,000 years B.P., it says so in the lede. Your recent additions are, therefore, too ancient. This is going to sound flippant, and it is meant to be just a wee bit, but when are you going to add dinosaurs? Quetzal1964 (talk)  18:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Norwegian red deer) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Norwegian red deer, Dennis the mennis!

Wikipedia editor Elmidae just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The subspecies seems generally accepted, so an article is probably justified - however, only if there is some substantial content with reliable sources. Please consider adding some, otherwise this stub may find itself merged back into red deer (as has happened to under-referenced sub-species stubs before)."

To reply, leave a comment on Elmidae's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of domesticated animals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_domesticated_animals check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_domesticated_animals?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Lobengula the South African lion
Hi, I would like to say that I shifted your work to the article Southern African lion, because it would be article like these that can have more specific information about lions. Leo1pard (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khouay buffalo (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khouay buffalo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khouay buffalo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Khouay_buffalo Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Justlettersandnumbers&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Khouay_buffalo reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Adding "The" to species names
, could you please stop adding "The" to species named after individuals? First, this is not common usage - see Darwin's fox, Gould's petrel, Wallace's tarsier, Spix's macaw, Humboldt's hog-nosed skunk, and any number of other examples. No definite article is required here. Second, you are making a mess of it, blindly inserting capitalized "The" into the middle of sentences. I am reverting what I am finding of this, and asking you to please cut it out. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Khouay buffalo


Hello, Dennis the mennis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khouay buffalo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fossa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Exotic pet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caracara ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Exotic_pet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Exotic_pet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Dolittle (film)
I have reverted your edits. Please see Talk:Dolittle_(film). - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Asian elephant not domesticated
Dear Dennis, Im once again removing Asian elephant from the List of domesticated animals, please do not submit it again backing it up with your personal opinion, if you cant give a scientific peer reviewed source giving a clear indication this species should have been domesticated. I run, since 2006 the global database of elephant individuals at www.elephant.se, and have only been able to record a total of 7 or 8 generations, from either species of elephants. This is too less numbers to discuss any kind of domestication, full, semi, or whatever. Just because a species has been captured and tamed, during long time, it doesn't make them domesticated, if all specimens were in fact wild.born, and captured and brought in captivity from the wild. And IF this should be a definition of a semi-domestication, a term which Im not sure is backed up by science, then that should cover the African species as well, but also hundreds of wild species, including tigers, lions, zebras, cape buffaloes, Eland antelopes, etc, the list will be longer than that page can handle.

In fact there were more African captured and tamed as Asians since last 20 yrs, but neither species has been bred for more than 7 generations, compared with one example, lions at UK circus with apr 35 generations, and if the African lion should be considred domesticated, or semi-domesticated, whatever that means, then hundreds of species are, and why not any species, humans ever captured and tamed?

With this in mind, the list of domesticated species, in questionable cases, should be backed up with reliable scientific sources, not with someone opinion, or personal interpretation.

Dan Koehl (talk) 12:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Since I believe you have been pushing your opinion with good faith, I did not report you to edit warring, but strongly advice you to follow the recommendations suggested at how to avoid being involved in edit warring and instead discuss your opinions at the talk page, rather than once again change that page according to your personal opinion and beliefs.

Talk page discussion is a prerequisite to almost all of Wikipedia's venues of higher dispute resolution. If you wish at any time to request a Third Opinion (3O), use the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard (DRN), or open a request for arbitration, you will be expected to show there has been talk page discussion of the dispute. Actual discussion is needed; discussion conducted entirely through edit summaries is inadequate. Requests for Comment generally require that at least an effort be made to discuss the matter in question before making the request.

Dan Koehl (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * EDIT Dear Dennis the mennis, I hereby apologize for accusing you of what I stated above, now after I noticed, it was in fact User who once again submitted the Asian elephant. Dan Koehl (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

N natrix/ N helvetica
N helvetica

Is that new image known to be N helvetica?

ThanksS C Cheese (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

...the Domesticated Animals list...
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but... the list is long enough without ungrouping grouped species just to add extra pictures. Please don't. Leave the conspecific groups grouped unless there's a clear reason to ungroup them (eg one is used for a different purpose, or had a rather different domestication history). Tamtrible (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

... looking again, you changed the genus, so they're no longer conspecific. Sorry to scold you incorrectly (though, given your history with the page... I think I had cause, to at least some extent...) Tamtrible (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced
Hi! You've re-added an alternate name to Ankole-Watusi after I removed it as unsourced. Please either (a) add the source you used or (b) remove it until such time as you've found one. This encyclopaedia is already staggering under the weight of unsourced material, I hope you'll agree that there's really no reason or excuse for adding to it. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Captive Reptile Information
Good Evening,

I appreciate the zeal to add to various reptile pages, but I don't think adding lines saying "this species is sometimes kept as a pet" to the articles of every reptile species you believe is sometimes kept as a pet is pertinent information, particularly since you are not providing citations for these assertions, even when making specific claims like western banded geckos are "very popular" pets.

Almost all reptiles (and probably nearly all animals in existence) are sometimes kept as pets. But that information isn't particularly relevant unless the species have a significant cultural impact or their breeding has an impact on them (ball pythons and leopard geckos are becoming domesticated which is worth mentioning). For example, the common toad is sometimes kept as a pet. But the featured article on the toad does not mention this fact because it's not really pertinent information. The alpine newt article (also featured) does mention captivity, as a population propagated in captivity is now extinct in the wild, so the fact the newts are kept as pets is relevant. I would recommend/request not merely stating "this species is sometimes kept as a pet" on short reptile articles for species that are not significantly impacted by captivity (ie, minimal impact on their wild populations/conservation, they are not being domesticated, minimal economic impact to the pet trade, etc). Also, please provide citations for any assertions you do make. Citations are critical to enable other editors to check the veracity of your claims.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Connorlong90 (talk) 08:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic goose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anser.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Domestic water buffalo
Please do not revert an edit with an edit summary without an explanation or take it to the talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 19:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , you are edit-warring over this at that and many other articles; please self-revert before this escalates, and then try to establish editor consensus on whether your edits were correct (I suggest either WT:FARM or WT:MAMMALS for that). Your statement that "domestic animals have no conservation status" is not sustainable: this document lists 7616 breeds, and gives the conservation status of many of them. This database lists about 14000 breeds, and attempts to assign a conservation status to each one. You might(?) have meant to suggest that domestic subspecies have no conservation status; if so, that somewhat questionable assertion would need to be supported by reliable sources and agreed with other editors. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * specific breeds being labeled CRITICAL or ENDANGERED do not justify giving the entire species a "domesticated" conservation status. The IUCN recognizes no such label for species. The burden of proof is on you to show that there is one. LittleJerry (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of countries by date of transition to republican system of government, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Further edits like this one will get you blocked from editing. This is stealth vandalism. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill'') 16:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've now looked at some of your past edits; I ought to have done that before issuing that warning, but this edit really jumped out at e when I saw it. Anyhw, it now looks to me as if this was likely unintentional. I understand how that can happen as I've made slips of similar severity in the past. Please remove this warning from your talk page if that was the case here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Species list template
Hi, I'm aware that you were only trying to correct the absence of italics. (I think the problem was originally caused by another editor, SesameHoneyTart.)

is used with a list of pairs of parameters: a bare species name and an authority. It automatically italicizes the species name and puts the authority in small text. Thus:

If you want to link the species name, then use, again with pairs of bare species name plus authority. Thus:

You can pipe the species name by using |. Thus:

It should not be used in any other way. In particular, never put the authority part of the pair in small tags, because this will use double small, which violates accessibility guidelines. Also it doesn't work if you have a distribution following the authority, because this gets put in small font, which is wrong. In such cases, use a bulleted list via * as normal. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Dennis the mennis. Thank you for your work on Succession to the Mosotho throne. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for viewing my article that I created. Dennis the mennis (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)