User talk:Dennisman

Ipswich Buses Service 13
A tag has been placed on Ipswich Buses Service 13, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 18:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

London Buses route C10
I was wondering why no one has looked or edited my new page, London Buses route C10 92.13.101.103 (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry that this message is being repeated, I forgot that I hadn't logged in. Can anyone help improve London Buses route C10 Dennisman (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, Dennisman. Your page had somehow been named "London buses route C10" with a lowercase 'b', which prevented Wikipedia from automatically linking it from other pages that had links to "London Buses route C10". I moved your page to remedy its orphan status, as well as adding the London Bus infobox, the navbox for London Buses routes, and appropriate categories. I came across your article after it had been flagged as an uncategorized article so I am not very familiar with the subject, but WikiProject London Transport should have guidelines and advice for further improving your article. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! --Oddharmonic (talk) 09:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello Dennisman, I have added a bit more info to the London Buses route C10 on the infobox. its only a small edit but I don't know much about the history of the route, Sorry. Matt G (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

How can I join WikiProject London Transport Dennisman (talk) 12:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Class 37/7 locomotives
On the West Coast Railway Company] page, it says that 37717 is the only class 37/7 of the four bought from EWS that will not be returned to service, yet I have read that 37710 is the one not to return to the main line. Don't reply if you think I am being stupid. Dennisman (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Another Bus Route
I have created a new page, London Buses route 215, and made a mess of it. I don't suppose someone could fix it? Dennisman (talk) 12:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Buses route 215
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article London Buses route 215, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable bus route.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Graymornings (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

London Buses route 215
It's unsourced, and it's a minor route that doesn't have any special significance. (The WP:BUSES page: "Note that minor routes do not need to have a separate article, but can simply be mentioned in a list.") The info should be placed in the London Buses article or deleted. As you must know, there are over a hundred London Buses routes, and each individual one can't possibly have its own article. If you'd like, you can remove the proposed deletion template and place this on WP:AFD instead.  Graymornings (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to say...
Just wanted to make it clear that I appreciate the work you're doing to improve transport articles on Wikipedia. You're doing a great job so far, and I hope you keep it up, because it's what makes Wikipedia so awesome. (I also hate bendi-buses - they make me queasy!)  Graymornings (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

User needs help
I just need to know how to create userboxes on my user page, and infoboxes on London Bus route pages. Dennisman (talk) 17:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Great!
I've got 2 new pages up, which I am very proud of. London Buses route 147 and London Buses route D8. Enjoy and post back to me what ypu think of them. See you soon with more new pages. Dennisman (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

your pages??
No problem, its always nice to know work is being recognised. Matt G (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Class 37
Is there any new information needed on these locomotives? Dennisman (talk) 11:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I've added my new pages. Visit British Rail Class 37/7 and British Rail Class 170/2 and tell me what they are like. Dennisman (talk) 11:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norwich Park and Ride
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Norwich Park and Ride, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Is a Park and Ride notable?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr. Vernon (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I have added some extra information, and left a note on your talk page. Please reply and say what you think. Dennisman 16:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

The extra information is interesting, but the question is, is this notable WP:NOTABILITY? I honestly don't think it is; there are many, many Park and Rides throughout the world. How is this one unique? Read the guidelines for more information. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

It is the biggest park and ride facillity in Britain. I thought that there wasn't enough information on it on the Norwich page. Dennisman 17:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I think it is notable, as it is the biggest such system in Britain. Therefore, I think it needs its own article. --Dennisman (talk) 15:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Christmas!
Almost 100 edits to Wikipedia! (97 in total, including this one) Christmas almost upon us. Have a Happy Christmas everyone! Dennisman (talk) Dennisman 10:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Wohoo! 100 edits to Wikipedia. Happy Christmas! --Dennisman 10:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy new year Wikipedia! Sorry this is 4 days late, my computer broke and had to fix it. --Dennisman (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

My signing button and four tildes dosen't work anymore. Just look at the end of the note, when I put my signature on. Dennisman 13:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

See. Dennisman 13:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You have probably changed the format of your signature. Go to "my preferences", then the "User profile" tab, and check the "Signature" field and the "Raw signature" checkbox.  If "Raw signature" is checked, then the "Signature" field should contain wikicode, including something like  .  If "Raw signature" is unchecked, then the "Signature" field should not contain wikicode.  —AlanBarrett (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

It's fine now. --Dennisman (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

NIBS
I have added a fleetlist onto the page. What do you think about it. Dennisman 13:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: FAQ
Go to "my preferences" -> uncheck raw signature and save. -- slakr \ talk / 01:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

What Happened!
My computer packs up for 3 days and one of my pages has been redirected! Why? Surely the Dennis Arrow bus deserves its own page, like Norwich park and ride. Anyone tell me otherwise, and why it was redirected? --Dennisman (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Norwich park and ride
Unfortunately they are copyrighted images on Fotopic so cannot be put on Wikipedia as they have non-free licenses. Arriva436talk/contribs 17:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Anglian Bus
Yes, that fleet summary is excellent. I've fixed a couple of links, part apart from that it was fine. I think a fleet summary is of much more use that a fleetlist, as a large fleet list pointlessly gives too much info that can be found elsewhere. A summary is much more useful! Arriva436talk/contribs 20:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Member
I am now officially a member of WikiProject London Transport. You should join, if you haven't already.--Dennisman (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I've also joined WikiProject UK Railways. Again, if you aren't a member, join.Dennisman (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

200 edits
Heh heh hey! 200 edits to Wikipedia. Now on the way to 300. --Dennisman (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

37's
Hello. I agree that the subclasses all must be mentioned, but would like to merge into the main article. Good work. See talk page, also would be interested to here your views on Talk:British_Rail_Class_37. Please respond on 37 talk page.Carrolljon (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

class 37 tidy
Thanks for your comments - if you're interested in class 37s you might like this if you haven't already seen it : ~7MB pdf - it's a copy of the original english electric pamplet and has some interesting info in. I'll try to put a link to it in the article later on.Carrolljon (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Yep thanks. See you. Dennisman (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

300 Edits!
Yes, 300 edits, and more to come from Dennisman! Dennisman (talk) 10:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ipswich park and ride
A tag has been placed on Ipswich park and ride requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign!) 17:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

If you feel the page will meet WP:N then add the hangon tag to the article under the speedy tag. An administrator will review the page and your rational for keeping the page and make an informed decision. Thank you for taking the time to edit Wikipedia -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign!) 17:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Feb metro!
Simply south not SS, sorry 14:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

April Metro
Simply south (talk) 11:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

May Metro
As Simply South is busy, I've stepped in for this one; this is my first time, so feel free to fix any mistakes or let me know of anything I've missed. – iride  scent  18:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 

June Metro
I've decided to fill in the empty job vacancy for the Metro for this month, feel free to correct any mistakes or add any missing information. Cheers! Crest of London (T 22:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

July Metro
 Oliver Fury, Esq. message  •  contributions  21:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The Metropolitan - Issue 16
--DavidCane (talk) 00:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

September Metro
Simply south (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

October Metro - better late than never
Simply south (talk) 21:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Nov Metro
Simply south (talk) 00:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

December Metro
Simply south (talk) 21:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

New Year Metro
. Simply south (talk) 01:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Metro
Another issue to be addressed is, please could people indicate in the next month at the feedback page or on my talk page whether they still want to recieve issues of the metro. A lot of newsletters seem to be going to redundant pages. Simply south (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

An ever later Metro
Simply south (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

April Metro
. Simply south (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

May + June Metro
Simply south (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

July Metro
Simply south (talk) 19:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

October Metro
Simply south (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

December Metro
. Simply south (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

January Metro
Simply south (talk) and their tree 23:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

March Metro
Better late than never. Simply south...... 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

May Metro
Simply south...... trying to improve for 5 years 22:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

July Metro
Simply south...... digging mountains for 5 years 21:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

August Metro
Simply south...... unintentionally mispelling fr 5 years So much for ER 17:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

September Metro
Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 07:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

November Metro
Simply south...... "time, department skies" for 5 years 01:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

New Year Metro
Sorry its late and happy new year. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 23:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

February Metro
Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 22:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

April Metro
Simply south...... going on editing sprees for just 6 years (as of 28/03/2006) 21:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

May Metro
Simply south...... going on editing sprees for just 6 years (as of 28/03/2006) 23:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

June Metro
On time for once! Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 21:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

July Metro
Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 22:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

August Metro
Simply south...... flapping wings into buildings for just 6 years 22:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

October Metro
I'm sorry I missed September but I was rather busy. Enjoy. Simply south...... wearing fish for just 6 years 23:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Mid Dec Metro
Sorry this edition is so late. Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 11:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Jan Metro
Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 20:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

March Metro
Simply south...... catching SNOWballs for just 6 years 21:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

April Metro
Simply south...... eating shoes for just 7 years 20:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

50th edition
Here is the 50th edition. I can only apologise this is so late as a lot of work came up but it is still no excuse so again I will apologise. Inside includes everything since the last edition as usual. Enjoy. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 22:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Oct Metro
I will also happily accept requests for the gallery (if not, images will be selected from archives elsewhere). Again I will also remind people that if they ever want to try doing a future month's issue, feel free to with your own style etc or even just stick to the current format. Don't hesitate to contact me for the resources of things to include in this newsletter. Otherwise, enjoy! Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 23:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

December edition
Please feel free to suggest any changes or add any requests such as images for the gallery. If you also want to have a try for the new year's edition or any future editions, please do not hesitate to ask. Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 21:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

First Norfolk & Suffolk
Hello! I have an up to date fleet list available on my blog: here's a direct link to the fleet list: http://www.norwichbuspage.com/p/fleet-lists_5.html

I've recently udpated pictures and info etc but some dick head from London keeps changing it back because apparently a Norwich-based enthusiast isn't a reliable enough source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZakNelson1995 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No blog is a reliable source.Charles (talk) 09:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)