User talk:Dennispreston

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Binary option ‎. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  17:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Binary option ‎. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru  (talk)  17:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 1537208411


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 1537208411. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – CALL or PUT. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at CALL or PUT – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fëanor (talk) 17:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text to this page. Kuru  (talk)  17:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Dennis, you seem to be here solely to promote your self-published "book" on amazon. Do you understand how you actions could have lead to this perception? Could you read through WP:COI and tell me how you would edit differently if unblocked? Kuru   (talk)  18:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW 'Unconstructive' is a word according to The Oxford University Press http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/unconstructive and other dictionary sites. Peridon (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * As a question unrelated to the merits of your block, given the stated subject matter of the book, what has Boris Johnson got to do with it?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:42, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Anthony, I didn't realise it said anything about Boris Johnson? I copied the code from his book page to use as a template to fill in the information for my book, must've left something in there :S so what kind of references would be used about my book? Does a book have to be written about in another book for it to be considered wiki-worthy? I'm so confused. If I get reviews from well-known websites, would that be a reference? Who would be likely to make a page about my book if I can't make one myself? Book critics? Any help would be greatly appreciated Anthony.