User talk:Dento sweet

Nomination of Rhabdomyoblast for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhabdomyoblast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rhabdomyoblast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EBE123 talkContribs 22:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Article deleted
Hello. I have deleted the article nominated for deletion as mentioned above. I felt that this was a direct copy of material found at http://www.mondofacto.com/facts/dictionary?rhabdomyoblast. There is a standard template used to inform editors of an action such as this, which I have affixed below. Regards, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC).

Standard copyvio notification template
Your addition to Rhabdomyoblast has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.