User talk:Denvatricky~enwiki

Proposed deletion of DJ Green Lantern Presents Fort Minor: We Major
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article DJ Green Lantern Presents Fort Minor: We Major, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable mixtape with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't see...
...any reasons for why this article should be deleted. Isn't Wikipedia a place for people to look up articles of interest? Several of the tracks has been published as CD singles, and therefore passes WP:BAND, but then another WP comes up; ALBUMS. Obviously this is an article of interest, since it has been published several times before. And why is this article on e.g. the Norwegian part of Wikipedia? It should be deleted for there too then. Just because it hasn't got any significant media coverage, doesn't mean this article isn't of interest! --Denvatricky (talk) 09:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:BAND is not applicable to albums, it's for people and groups only. WP:NALBUMS clearly states that mixtapes are usually not notable. Interest does not equal notability. TheJazzDalek (talk) 11:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Denvatricky. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Denvatricky~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)