User talk:DenverBallZ

AfC notification: User:DenverBallZ/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:DenverBallZ/sandbox. Thanks! SK2242 (talk) 02:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

DenverBallZ (talk) 02:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC) thanks

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Winter has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Winter. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Winter (April 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susan Winter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Susan Winter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Susan_Winter Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nearlyevil665&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Susan_Winter reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665  06:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Writing on userpage/article denied
Hello DenverBallZ, please keep in mind that the proper space for addressing other users is their user talk page, instead of editing their user pages. As for your comment, no, I cannot provide a detailed source assessment table for all individual references for the denied article as it has been referenced-bombed by low-quality sources. The issue of WP:OVERCITE has been previously noted by another reviewer as well. Also, when communicating with users on Wikipedia, please remember to treats other users with consideration and respect, even if you disagree with their judgement. nearlyevil 665  04:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC) Let me ask you again. Did you visit the links cited or did you just act with presumption? It is courteous to make judgements based on evidence and not presumption. I see that you failed to cite many of the subjects' pages you created. Based on that evidence, would you like them flagged? DenverBallZ (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Denver, yes, I did a manual check and failed to find multiple reliable independent sources with significant non-trivial coverage of the subject as per WP:GNG. You are always at the liberty to resubmit without making any substantial adjustments, if you consider it the proper thing to do. I would strongly suggest you address WP:OVERCITE. As noted earlier, you don't need six references to a bundle of primary and secondary sources for a trivial sentence. Your lead section, for example, currently has a total of 16 references for three sentences. Five references out of these sixteen are to Amazon and the subject's personal shop page, which could be perceived as using Wikipedia for advertising one's products. There is a general consensus as per WP:RSP that this is unnecessary and that the authors' names and ISBNs are sufficient. As for my articles - just like any other user on Wikipedia you are free to nominate any article for deletion in line with WP:AFD. Please do bear in mind that most of my articles are on rugby union players the notability of which are subject to specific notability guidelines, specifically WP:NRU, and the references presented are sufficient to establish the following WP:NRU criteria: "A rugby union person is presumed notable if they have played for, coached, or administered: A "High Performance Union" at any time or another test nation during an appearance at the men's Rugby World Cup". If you disagree about the notability of any of my articles, I only welcome you to make the nomination. In fact, I have a separate section on my userpage with articles (currently only one) of mine that had been properly tagged for deletion. Best of luck and hope you enjoy your stay on Wikipedia! nearlyevil  665  07:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Antonucci (2) (June 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Antonucci (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Antonucci (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_Antonucci_(2) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ken_Tony&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_Antonucci_(2) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Ken Tony  Shall we discuss? 12:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Antonucci (2) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Antonucci (2). Thanks!  Ken Tony  Shall we discuss? 12:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Susan Winter
Hello, DenverBallZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Susan Winter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Susan Winter


Hello, DenverBallZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susan Winter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Antonucci
Hello, DenverBallZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Antonucci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Antonucci (2)
Hello, DenverBallZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Antonucci (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)