User talk:Deodoot

Welcome!
Hello, Deodoot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Deosai National Park did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

I have made that edit in Deosai page because its a known fact that Deva does not a giant so calling it a shadow of giant is quite vague. I have also linked the Deva page for clarification. Thank you.Deodoot (talk) 17:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * So provide a reference if you want to change the existing consensus - see guide for citing sources above. Or start a discussion on the article's talk page. But don't make a unilateral change or it will simply be reverted. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

In that case, please remove the entire paragraph because the shadow of giant claim is also unsourced so why keep that? Deodoot (talk) 17:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * If you think it's the right thing to do then do it. Others might disagree with you, but I will rarely if ever disagree with the removal of unreferenced content. I certainly won't disagree in this case if you removed the whole etymology section. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * To be clear, a smaller encyclopaedia, but with more referenced content is a very good thing. It's a fundamental par of why I edit here. If your motivation is correcting errors then that's also an excellent thing but you can't correct one un-cited fact with another. Reference everything! Let me know if you need any help. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

oh okay, I understand it now. Thanks for the information.Deodoot (talk) 18:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)