User talk:Deolankar

Ecoorgan
I've added the "prod" template to the article Ecoorgan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Ecoorgan. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr Stephen 18:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Ecoorgan
I see you have redirected the article ecoorgan to Human Microbial Organ. However, much of the content remains the same, and the concerns raised at Articles for deletion/Ecoorgan and by me here remain the same, namely that theses article only exist to define and rationalise the neologism "ecoorgan" (coined by you, I think). I also note that many of your edits to wikipedia are to include the term "ecoorgan" in articles. Do you have any reliable sources (see WP:RS & WP:NEO) that define this term and show that it has been accepted by the relevant community? In their absence, I think this term ought to be stripped from WP, and I would take it to WP:AFD. Regards, Mr Stephen 21:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Disease Causal Chain
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Disease Causal Chain, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is not more than a dictionary entry, and even as a dictionary entry there is not much notability, e.g., a google search on "disease causal chain" does not point to much on this topic. Article also lacks references and context.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Careful Cowboy (talk) 05:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Umbil


The article Umbil has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I could not any reliable source confirming the existence of this."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lourdes 07:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)