User talk:DepressedPer/Archive 8

Merger discussion for List of 2010s one-hit wonders in the United States
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash; List of 2010s one-hit wonders in the United States &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 03:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Just FYI...
Per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, we don't need to include "via Newspapers.com" in a reference if we've read the whole source, not just a snippet. ~ Rob 13 Talk 14:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

One-hit wonders articles
The series of articles detailing the one-hit wonders in various decades was, by far, my favorite series of articles on Wikipedia. I've followed it for several years and I'm incredibly disappointed that it's being merged into one page. With that being said, it looks like discussion on the article has closed and the new changes are moving forward. Is there a chance that the series can be maintained on a personal wiki page? Do you have any interest in maintaining the series? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princeparrotfish (talk • contribs) 15:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

US one hit wonders page removed?
Depressedper, you frequently edited the 2010s US one hit wonders page as well as the other decades. Do you know why these pages have been removed and redirects to this one single (less detailed) page? Mattzap44 (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baby Blue (Action Bronson song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baby Blue (Action Bronson song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baby Blue (Action Bronson song)
The article Baby Blue (Action Bronson song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Baby Blue (Action Bronson song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Family Trade
Hey DepressedPer, I hope you're well. Remember Family Trade? You reviewed the article at GAN for me about 3.5 years ago (such a long time ago that I've changed my username since then). I've continued to improve it, and it's now at FAC and could use a couple of more reviews. I totally understand if you're busy, but if you're interested in revisiting the article, I'd be glad to hear what you think of it! Regards, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baby Blue (Action Bronson song)
The article Baby Blue (Action Bronson song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baby Blue (Action Bronson song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How to Make an American Quilt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Joy Luck Club ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/How_to_Make_an_American_Quilt check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/How_to_Make_an_American_Quilt?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Mismatches
Thanks for your work sorting out these. Much appreciated. AIRcorn (talk) 10:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mine Is Yours
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mine Is Yours you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 21:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't want to take you away from the mismatches so no rush on this. AIRcorn (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Removing GA nomination discussions on article talk pages
Would you mind explaining why you are removing these discussions? My understanding is that they shouldn't be removed without at least being archived. If I wanted to see the GA discussion for an GA article, I shouldn't have to comb through the talk page's history to find it. Maybe I'm missing something obvious? --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC):
 * With the article passing GA-class, I thought I remove the discussion and add a link above in the article history template that shows the GA symbol. DepressedPer (talk) 16:08, 18 May 2018, (UTC)
 * OK, that makes sense. Didn't realize there was a link there until now. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mine Is Yours
The article Mine Is Yours you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mine Is Yours for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

GA status of Despacito
Hi DepressedPer. I'm just curious about this edit. I had done the same thing here, but was subsequently reverted. I also made this edit and this edit which were also subsequently reverted. I've been trying to clarify the GA status of the article at WP:GAHELP, so maybe you can do that. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bless&#39; Bible.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bless&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

FAC: Forca Bruta
I found your name at the R&B/soul WikiProject page, and have been considering asking someone since the FAC nomination stagnated. Can you offer comments or review? Dan56 (talk) 02:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Tiny Mix Tapes
Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding Tiny Mix Tapes should be count as an reliable source or not. If you want to. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 11:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)