User talk:Deracb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_Famous_Audio_Hacker

Notability of World Famous Audio Hacker
A tag has been placed on World Famous Audio Hacker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deracb (talk) 20:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of World Famous Audio Hacker
A tag has been placed on World Famous Audio Hacker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Ziggy  Saw  dust  20:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page World Famous Audio Hacker has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=29906300).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page World Famous Audio Hacker has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JovianEye (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Talk:World Famous Audio Hacker constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:World Famous Audio Hacker, you will be blocked for vandalism. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want this article deleted, the only option left open is to nominate it at articles for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, you seem to be suffering from a case of selective listening, so I'll try to make it clear to you once more. If you want the article deleted YOU NEED TO NOMINATE IT VIA WP:AFD AND NOT SPEEDY DELETION. The only result continuing to try and nominate it for speedy deletion is going to have is you being blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Oops. OK, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.134.137.71 (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of World Famous Audio Hacker
I have nominated World Famous Audio Hacker, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/World Famous Audio Hacker. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I nominated it for you, please explain yourself at the AFD. Consider yourself warned for the last time about the wisdom of re-adding the speedy deletion templates. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)