User talk:Derekfish

February 2016
Hello, I'm Charlesdrakew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, West Highland Way, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Bit rubbish to revert on the basis of not having a source if you ask me; there are plenty ways to flag information as needing/lacking a source, without resorting to removing the new info. A quick google reveals plenty sources for the information added, and reverting as if (as yet) unsourced information has no value at all is not what I call a constructive edit. Adding up-to-date information, as was done here, is constructive, so does not deserve to be reverted as if it's detrimental to the article. There is no citation for the version of the information you reverted to, so I don't know why you think it's any more valid than the (also unreferenced) updated version. &mdash; pmcm 21:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)