User talk:DerpderpX

Welcome!
Hello, DerpderpX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. --  Hounder4  23:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Saurolophus. --Mr Fink (talk) 21:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Saurornitholestes. --Mr Fink (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it is time to report this guy? Only seems to disrupt after warnings. FunkMonk (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Appalachian dinosaurs. --Mr Fink (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Deoxys. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Onel 5969  TT me 14:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Deoxys. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dakotasuchus, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hi there. I'm Serge, an admin here. While I do appreciate the fact that you seem intent on adding sources to Wikipedia. It's a very important aspect of Wikipedia. However, you really should read over WP:LEAD. The articles lead (intro paragraph(s)) don't need sources if it's already sourced in the body of the article. A well-written lead/intro should only summarized what is later written (and sourced) later on in the article. It's an overview of what the article will cover, basically.

I just wanted to let you know, as a number of your recent edits showed you adding references to lead/intros that didn't need it. I just didn't want you wasting time doing unnecesssary things is all. Thanks! Sergecross73  msg me  18:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , please also note WP:CITEKILL — adding four or more references, as you did at Cincinnati Bengals, to a single sentence does not improve an article's quality, readability, or reliability. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, I tend to get carried away with references mostly due the fact that research is one of my biggest fields of interest. But I see what you mean. It isn't a big deal though. DerpderpX (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)