User talk:Derpswagyolo

April 2014
Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Juan Seguín because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Seguín. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  03:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Katie hale


A tag has been placed on Katie hale, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  03:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  03:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wyatt Smith. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  03:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)