User talk:Desaderal

Salmonella
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 19:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link,  you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 20:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link,  you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. -- Tawker 04:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Hi tawker and Veinor, all references to commercial outside links have been deleted and a link to an article that is neutral has been added.--Desaderal 20:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals
The Stub Sorting proposals page is proposing new stub types, not for proposing stub articles. Caerwine Caer’s whines 04:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Hi Caer's whines..thank you for your comments. I am new to this and did that by mistake. I am sorry--Desaderal 18:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Food Tasting Strips
According to the notice, it's because the article is spam. ^ demon [omg plz] 19:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

After the necessary changes how is the article spam?--Desaderal 20:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1001 Internet Jokes II


The article 1001 Internet Jokes II has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 09:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 1001 Internet Jokes for deletion
The article 1001 Internet Jokes is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1001 Internet Jokes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

1001 Internet Jokes II has also been nominated for deletion - the two articles are discussed together here. --bonadea contributions talk 20:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 14:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Gay Travel Guide for Tops and Bottoms for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Gay Travel Guide for Tops and Bottoms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Gay Travel Guide for Tops and Bottoms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 13:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I declined to delete the article on Robert Joseph Greene, but sent it for AfD to get a community decision. My own guess is that the most likely notability will be because of the censorship controversy about This High School has Closets  While checking, I also noticed the GTG, above, and listed it similarly. I recognize he limitation of judging by library holdings; the best way to defend these articles would be with reviews of the books. There are lots of Reliable places where they might be published.  DGG ( talk ) 13:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

re Thank you...
Cirt, I don't know how to send you a private message. I see you trying to be fair and supportive when others are not. I feel that I am before an audience that makes LGBT community work twice as hard to keep their materials on Wikipedia. In my opinion, it's a flawed system at best that skews towards a majority. However, you are (to me) the only ray of sunshine is all of this terrible experience. You may delete this if you wish but I just didn't want you to walk away not knowing that all the good karma that you do here doesn't go unoticed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desaderal (talk • contribs)
 * You're most welcome! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Response to comment at village pump
Hi Desaderal. I just wanted to let you know that I and another person have responded to your question at the village pump permalink We would like to encourage you to bring your concerns to others by posting them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention and also at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. It is important for the community here at Wikipedia to know when it is failing its volunteer editors. We would like to know how we can improve the situation. Thanks for volunteering here at the project. Kind regards. 64.40.54.118 (talk) 02:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)