User talk:DesertEagle73

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions here. I hope you enjoy the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful in the future: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please always sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your page and someone will show up shortly to answer all of your questions!Trampton 04:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC).
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker obit
You modified the entry for Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker on the Deaths in 2007 page to add the wikilink to Nazi. I read the article on Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, and there is no evidence that he was a Nazi; indeed, the biography indicates that he may actually have been trying to subvert Nazi objectives with his fellow physicists. The title of the article in the Palm Springs Desert Sun was also not supported by facts. If you'd read the original article in German posted at www.tagesschau.de, You'd find that "Nazi" wasn't mentioned even once. Therefore, I reverted the entry to its previous form. Not all Germans were Nazis. Not all Nazis were Germans. Please stick to the facts. &mdash;QuicksilverT @ 05:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Alexis Flores
A "" template has been added to the article Alexis Flores, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Navou 05:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alexis Flores
I've nominated Alexis Flores, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Alexis Flores satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Alexis Flores and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Alexis Flores during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Navou 15:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives
Hi DesertEagle73. I'd like to point out this link. When discussing criminals, we generally can't make accusations against them until they've been convicted. I've made the changes. Also, you might want to consider joining WP:FBI. We could use your help! Thanks, and regards,  Cool Blue  talk to me 23:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for your understanding!  Cool Blue  talk to me 23:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Deaths in 2008
An editor has nominated Deaths in 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed new policy
As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:
 * A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.
 * A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009. Don't just say or Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support.
 * Oppose.

Edit reverted
Your edit to Deaths in 2011, regardless if it was intended as a joke, was completely inappropriate and has been reverted. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deaths in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Band of Brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)